“Uhhhh, do you know anything about Warren Buffett? Here’s a good place to start: Buffett slams dividend tax cut. You appear to be clueless about many things pp.”

Buffett slams the dividend tax cut, so that classifies him as a man who isn’t part of the establishment and who is willing to take the existing system and improve it? Bring your heads out of the clouds, TB. 35% of the financial community slams the dividend tax cut. The dividend tax cut, like the inheritance tax, isn’t exactly a revolutionary issue because it affects primarily the WEALTHY. Why don’t you share with me Buffett’s thoughts on issues that affect the bulk of Americans?

You, my friend, are the one who is completely clueless. I’d love to hear you give more examples of Buffett’s efforts to take on the system and change it. I’d love to hear Buffett’s thoughts on outsourcing, tax cuts and credits for corporations shifting the base of their operations out of the U.S., eliminating the electoral college, and a variety of other issues that would truly indicate where his interests lie. Don’t over-simplify the matter, TB.

And by the way, what else do “I appear to be clueless about,” TB? I write a lengthy post outlining specific concerns, and the best you can do is tell me I’m clueless? Do you have any thoughts on the questions I raised about Obama’s position on Iran or any of the other issues I raised? Please, before you start name-calling, please do me the favor of calling out the specific issues you take umbrage with. Otherwise, don’t even bother to weigh in with your one-note thoughts. And show some decency by giving posters who disagree with you some degree of respect and courtesy. I have done that in all of my previous posts, even when disagreeing with others. Name calling is the last resort of an ill-informed mind.