As for the facts, (reading comprehension time), I was referring to the fact that I have facts on my side that Hasan was a jihadist. Your position, that religion and him being muslim had nothing to do with his actions and that it was some sort of CIA conspiracy – that had no facts. And it still has no facts.
That was never OUR argument. Geez, talk about comprehension. We were debating violence being taught by religions AND I countered you point by point.
Remember your 3 points on why Islam was different. Which I disagreed and showed you, all three religions met all the criteria which you set fourth. EXCEPT the universal call for violence which you just made up in your fairy tail laden reality. When confronted you said “Well they say it’s not universal but they are lying” In typical surveyor fashion replacing beliefs with evidence, while claiming he has the “facts”.
As for Hasan, at first, I thought it was some sort of cover up because of the other alleged shooters in early reporting. Which btw, were never explained and just disappeared w/o explanation. However, since they don’t report on them or even offer an explanation we don’t talk about it. Because the media is free and always looking out for honesty in reporting, right?
Here is another article on how they manipulated the original reporting. Can’t trust anything, I tell ya.
I never really cared if he killed because of religion or craziness. B/c it is the SAME shit to me.
Another headline for the story could have been:
BREAKING NEWS: Man slowly loses mind due to pressures of war and finds sanctuary in the violence of religion, army and CIA fail to see obvious warning for years!
