[quote=davelj]
The hypocrisy lies in the fact that I think you would do the deal (despite your stated disapproval of such deals here). Yes, yes, yes… I know you’re saying here that you wouldn’t. (Well, actually, you said “in all likelihood” you wouldn’t do the deal… that’s a nice bit of Clintonian wiggle room you’ve left yourself there. I guess the “in all likelihood” bit leaves the door open for you to do the deal if it’s REALLY good, in which case ethics are a secondary matter.) Yes, perhaps you’re in the 1% of folks who would pass on “ethical” (by your definition) grounds. But, as this is the internet, it’s my prerogative not to believe you. (Words, after all, are plentiful, but only deeds are precious.) And it’s your prerogative not to care whether I believe you. So there you have it.
[/quote]

Okay don’t believe me.. it doesn’t matter. Whether or not I would take the deal has NO bearing on whether or not the deal itself is unethical. That’s the definition of an ad hominem fallacy.

If a chain smoker told you that smoking is bad for your health, could you tell the chain smoker, “You’re wrong. Smoking is not bad for your health because you are a hypocrite.”

We’re talking about whether or not this deal is unethical. We’re not talking about whether or not you or I would do this deal.