[quote=TheBreeze]By the way, I wish all of you top-1-percenters good luck in the upcoming war between you and the rest of America. I think it will be a good, clean, fair fight where stolen wealth makes not a whit not.
It looks like you top-1-percenters will also have some help in the form of Alan from Fallbrook — he of the excellent balance-sheet reading skills. So tell us Alan, using your supersharp balance-sheet reading skills, where will the U.S. end up vis-a-vis the TARP? Up 10%? Down 35%? Will taxpayers lose it all? Will the government come up with some other feces-filled plan to bail out the TARP so that it looks like the TARP actually makes money in the end?
You top-1-percenters be sure to make good use of Alan during the battle. Of course, he will probably have his head so far up davelj’s ass that he can’t shoot straight, but you top-1-percenters should be used to that. Good luck, and God speed.[/quote]
I think the irony is that eventually I’d say in about 2-3 years, “the rest of america” who is so infactuated with Obama, will sadly learn that despite all the rhetoric, all Obama will have done is redirected all of the public’s money into the top 1% of people of his corrupt people that funds his administration, despite the handwaving of “war on the rich”. Same shit, different corruption, and a good percentage of americas as just gullable to fell for it, just like a good percentage of americas fell for the bush(it) administration. Isn’t it alarming yet that it’s not even the 1 year mark, and a good portion of Obama’s picks have been entangled in ethics/controversy?
BTW: this shock and awe at the AIG bonus is going to backfire if it comes to when AIG needs more bailout, and the Fed/public says hell no…It will be interesting to see what ends up causing the tailspin down. All Obama/Democrats did was paint themselves into a corner. Damned if they help AIG again, damned if the dont. If the bonus was such an issue, why wasn’t it redflagged earlier?
