There”s no reason even consider “giving up on you”.
We are just talking about too many things at once.
Page 1 section 4D
“Seller has been advised of Broker’s policy regarding cooperation with, and the amount of compensation offered to other brokers.
(1) Broker is authorized to cooperate with and compensate brokers participating through the multiple listing service(s) by offering MLS brokers either ________(you put in the number here) percent of the purchase price or $________.
(2) Broker is authorized to cooperate with and compensate brokers operating outside the MLS as per Brokers policy.
***********
Something like the above used to be on the RPA. I can’t remember when exactly it changed…about 5 years ago? I believe there was a a time when it was considered redundant to the mls offer of commission and it didn’t matter. I always filled it in anyway.
Item 29 as you say, or item 32 of the RPA probably covers the FSBO and not very well if it does. I think it is 32 and 29 is for buyer’s brokers? It doesn’t really matter because without some other agreement, which we will of course have, there is no obligation of a commission.
Anyway, yep no commissions to non-licensees but the reduction in price or other benefit, that they should be able to negotiate to account for it, is just as good.
