Menu

Home › Forums › Other › Constitution pretty vague really.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 30, 2020 at 9:00 AM #22897
    scaredyclassic
    Participant

    So no more screaming, ITS UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

    5 -4 split. Churches gotta close. If one judge were in a diff mood they could stay open.

    Anyone who says tgey know what will happen is wrong. No one knows what the future brings.

    Instead say, it might be unconstitutional.
    Might be constitutional. . Depends on whats blowin in the wind…social change. A virus…

    May 31, 2020 at 8:50 AM #817675
    svelte
    Participant

    I have often mused at how many SC decisions are 5-4.

    Such important and permanent decisions made with what appears to be the chance of a coin toss. If just one person on the court had been someone else, the decision could have went the other way.

    Really kinda spooky to think about.

    On the other hand, the reason cases usually make it to the SC is that there were mixed decisions downstream. The answer wasn’t even clear to the lower courts, so a 5-4 decision seems consistent with the situation.

    All in how you look at it I guess.

    May 31, 2020 at 10:00 AM #817677
    phaster
    Participant

    Trump Needs A Factcheck on How Twitter, the First Amendment, and Section 230 Operate

    https://www.cato.org/multimedia/cato-daily-podcast/trump-needs-factcheck-how-twitter-first-amendment-section-230-operate

    May 31, 2020 at 10:47 PM #817724
    outtamojo
    Participant

    Apparently kavanaugh is an activist judge
    https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/05/supreme-court-coronavirus-california-churches.html

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.