Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Quantitative Easing Benefits the Super-Elite … And Hurts the Little Guy and the American Economy
- This topic has 47 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 11 months ago by SK in CV.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 13, 2012 at 8:06 AM #20375December 13, 2012 at 8:14 AM #756232CoronitaParticipant
Not my problem…..
I was against all this “tax people more (particularly “quasi-rich”), so we can spend even more then we collect”…But apparently a lot of voters thought it was a good thing…Because after all, it’s always rich people’s fault….
Not my problem, not my concern… Now where are my refinance papers again….
December 13, 2012 at 8:36 AM #756238SD RealtorParticipantObviously Bush is behind all of this, even QE4, 5, 6 and 7!
December 13, 2012 at 9:14 AM #756242CoronitaParticipant[quote=SD Realtor]Obviously Bush is behind all of this, even QE4, 5, 6 and 7![/quote]
It’s not possible Bush is behind it… Because many people think Bush is intellectually challenged and can’t count that high.
December 13, 2012 at 9:22 AM #756244sjkParticipant[quote=flu]Not my problem…..
I was against all this “tax people more (particularly “quasi-rich”), so we can spend even more then we collect”…But apparently a lot of voters thought it was a good thing…Because after all, it’s always rich people’s fault….
Not my problem, not my concern… Now where are my refinance papers again….[/quote]
Enjoy your place setting at the captain’s table flu, it will be in do course, as your on the Titanic…..
Regards,
December 13, 2012 at 9:29 AM #756245SK in CVParticipant[quote=SD Realtor]Obviously Bush is behind all of this, even QE4, 5, 6 and 7![/quote]
I’m quite sure nobody has ever claimed that Bush is behind it. It’s as ridiculous a claim as that which charges this is Keynesian economics at work. It’s not. Keynes, at most, was agnostic on monetary manipulation as a means of economic stimulus.
I’m not so sure that it doesn’t benefit the economy as a whole, but there’s no question that the biggest beneficiaries are debt holders. That’s the big banks. Is there a better way to do the same thing or better for the economy as a whole without particularly benefitting the banking industry? I could be convinced, but I haven’t seen any ideas that meet the requirements.
December 13, 2012 at 9:30 AM #756246livinincaliParticipantI’m just waiting for the never could have seen it coming. We’re about there now. Almost 4 years of various QEs and nothing bad has happened yet, so nothing bad will happen in the future. The only real question now is how and when it comes unglued.
December 13, 2012 at 9:47 AM #756248livinincaliParticipant[quote=SK in CV]
I’m not so sure that it doesn’t benefit the economy as a whole, but there’s no question that the biggest beneficiaries are debt holders. That’s the big banks. Is there a better way to do the same thing or better for the economy as a whole without particularly benefitting the banking industry? I could be convinced, but I haven’t seen any ideas that meet the requirements.[/quote]In my view the primary purpose of QEx is to allow the government to deficit spend over a trillion per year. The government would probably have to pay too much to incur that much debt without it. The fundamental problem is every economist/policy maker is focused on the demand side of the equation and how to create more debt to stimulate demand. It’s an idea that has run it’s course, but it doesn’t stop them from trying it’s the only thing they know.
December 13, 2012 at 10:47 AM #756257Diego MamaniParticipantThere is no “FED.” Fed is short for Federal Reserve Board. You can write FRB if you like acronyms, but most people who know what the institution is write “Fed.”
December 13, 2012 at 11:23 AM #756263anParticipant[quote=sjk][quote=flu]Not my problem…..
I was against all this “tax people more (particularly “quasi-rich”), so we can spend even more then we collect”…But apparently a lot of voters thought it was a good thing…Because after all, it’s always rich people’s fault….
Not my problem, not my concern… Now where are my refinance papers again….[/quote]
Enjoy your place setting at the captain’s table flu, it will be in do course, as your on the Titanic…..
Regards,[/quote]Why wouldn’t you. If you know you’re on the Titanic and it’ll crash some day. Why not sit at the captain’s table AND secure your own life vessel when the time comes. What’s the point of running around in the boiler room complaining the captain is going to kill us all.
December 13, 2012 at 8:34 PM #756273scaredyclassicParticipantindividualsand business sometimes are headed for bankruptcy and things aren’t cataclysmic; they emerge healthier after the process.
i don’t know, but is it possible everything could be ok?
December 13, 2012 at 9:09 PM #756274SD RealtorParticipantAnything is possible.
It is possible I will win the lottery. Highly improbably but possible.
Just in case I don’t though I am trying to take some measures to be prepared. I think having land and water is a good first step.
December 13, 2012 at 10:28 PM #756275paramountParticipantA lot could be said, instead take a look at this expose of a Detroit school:
http://www.businessinsider.com/photos-of-abandoned-detroit-high-school-2012-12#-1
Detroit Decline:
For many areas of the country, I’m afraid these are pictures of the future.
“Our entire economy is a giant mirage. Our prosperity has been purchased by stealing from the future. A few people have been warning that we have completely destroyed our future in the process, but both major political parties just continue to do it and the mainstream media just continues to cheer them on.
At some point this con game will end and this economic mirage will disappear. When that happens, millions of people all over this country are going to become very angry and very desperate.
I hope that you have a plan for what you will do when that happens.”
December 13, 2012 at 10:56 PM #756276scaredyclassicParticipanti guess ive just expected the jig to be up for so long that now Im thinking the jig will stay down probably till i’m dead. the jig is uncertain after that.
reps with 235 today, masterfully, if I do say so myself. physical ability may matter more int he future.
December 14, 2012 at 2:14 AM #756277ucodegenParticipant[quote=squat300]i guess ive just expected the jig to be up for so long that now Im thinking the jig will stay down probably till i’m dead. the jig is uncertain after that.
reps with 235 today, masterfully, if I do say so myself. physical ability may matter more int he future.[/quote]If you are planning for the future, make sure you get some work in on the upper body too…
Personally I am consider that they are going to ‘inflate’ their way out of it… It causes the house prices to rise to the values of the underlying notes, and allows the gov to spend like crazy.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.