Menu

Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › The Anti-Regulators are the Job Killers

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 211 total)
1 2 3 … 13 14 15
  • Author
    Posts
  • January 18, 2011 at 7:50 AM #18409
    ILoveRegulation
    Participant

    An excellent article by Bill Black.

    http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2011/01/the-anti-regulators-are-the-job-killers/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheBigPicture+%28The+Big+Picture%29

    It’s too bad so many in this country have been brainwashed into thinking that all regulations are bad.

    January 18, 2011 at 7:57 AM #655190
    NotCranky
    Participant

    I think the people in code enforcement that go around jacking people in an attempt to fund their jobs and pensions don’t think regulation is bad.

    January 18, 2011 at 7:57 AM #655252
    NotCranky
    Participant

    I think the people in code enforcement that go around jacking people in an attempt to fund their jobs and pensions don’t think regulation is bad.

    January 18, 2011 at 7:57 AM #655848
    NotCranky
    Participant

    I think the people in code enforcement that go around jacking people in an attempt to fund their jobs and pensions don’t think regulation is bad.

    January 18, 2011 at 7:57 AM #655988
    NotCranky
    Participant

    I think the people in code enforcement that go around jacking people in an attempt to fund their jobs and pensions don’t think regulation is bad.

    January 18, 2011 at 7:57 AM #656318
    NotCranky
    Participant

    I think the people in code enforcement that go around jacking people in an attempt to fund their jobs and pensions don’t think regulation is bad.

    January 18, 2011 at 9:01 AM #655260
    ucodegen
    Participant

    1) I think the OP is trolling in this case. The account name was created just to post this.
    2) The referenced article is simplistic. Much more simplistic than a professor of Economics and Law should come up with. He took a something which had a surprisingly simple cure and spun it into a justification for something much more far reaching. The author also did not distinguish between regulation and the enforcement of existing regulation. There is a big difference between having regulation and not enforcing it versus not having the regulation in the first place.

    The cause of the whole financial collapse of cards is actually fairly simple. Risk was not correctly priced when it came to mortgage loans. Why?
    1) You had Congress tampering with risk pricing through Freddie and Fannie.
    2) Credit Default Swaps, which are really insurance policies, are not regulated as such. Credit Default Swaps are the sacred cows of the banking industry because they allow almost unlimited leverage.

    You can also expand this to include:
    3) Lack of basic financial knowledge on the part of most of the populace.
    4) Reduction in concepts of personal responsibility on the part of a large portion of the populace. (Entitlement generation).

    January 18, 2011 at 9:01 AM #655322
    ucodegen
    Participant

    1) I think the OP is trolling in this case. The account name was created just to post this.
    2) The referenced article is simplistic. Much more simplistic than a professor of Economics and Law should come up with. He took a something which had a surprisingly simple cure and spun it into a justification for something much more far reaching. The author also did not distinguish between regulation and the enforcement of existing regulation. There is a big difference between having regulation and not enforcing it versus not having the regulation in the first place.

    The cause of the whole financial collapse of cards is actually fairly simple. Risk was not correctly priced when it came to mortgage loans. Why?
    1) You had Congress tampering with risk pricing through Freddie and Fannie.
    2) Credit Default Swaps, which are really insurance policies, are not regulated as such. Credit Default Swaps are the sacred cows of the banking industry because they allow almost unlimited leverage.

    You can also expand this to include:
    3) Lack of basic financial knowledge on the part of most of the populace.
    4) Reduction in concepts of personal responsibility on the part of a large portion of the populace. (Entitlement generation).

    January 18, 2011 at 9:01 AM #655919
    ucodegen
    Participant

    1) I think the OP is trolling in this case. The account name was created just to post this.
    2) The referenced article is simplistic. Much more simplistic than a professor of Economics and Law should come up with. He took a something which had a surprisingly simple cure and spun it into a justification for something much more far reaching. The author also did not distinguish between regulation and the enforcement of existing regulation. There is a big difference between having regulation and not enforcing it versus not having the regulation in the first place.

    The cause of the whole financial collapse of cards is actually fairly simple. Risk was not correctly priced when it came to mortgage loans. Why?
    1) You had Congress tampering with risk pricing through Freddie and Fannie.
    2) Credit Default Swaps, which are really insurance policies, are not regulated as such. Credit Default Swaps are the sacred cows of the banking industry because they allow almost unlimited leverage.

    You can also expand this to include:
    3) Lack of basic financial knowledge on the part of most of the populace.
    4) Reduction in concepts of personal responsibility on the part of a large portion of the populace. (Entitlement generation).

    January 18, 2011 at 9:01 AM #656058
    ucodegen
    Participant

    1) I think the OP is trolling in this case. The account name was created just to post this.
    2) The referenced article is simplistic. Much more simplistic than a professor of Economics and Law should come up with. He took a something which had a surprisingly simple cure and spun it into a justification for something much more far reaching. The author also did not distinguish between regulation and the enforcement of existing regulation. There is a big difference between having regulation and not enforcing it versus not having the regulation in the first place.

    The cause of the whole financial collapse of cards is actually fairly simple. Risk was not correctly priced when it came to mortgage loans. Why?
    1) You had Congress tampering with risk pricing through Freddie and Fannie.
    2) Credit Default Swaps, which are really insurance policies, are not regulated as such. Credit Default Swaps are the sacred cows of the banking industry because they allow almost unlimited leverage.

    You can also expand this to include:
    3) Lack of basic financial knowledge on the part of most of the populace.
    4) Reduction in concepts of personal responsibility on the part of a large portion of the populace. (Entitlement generation).

    January 18, 2011 at 9:01 AM #656388
    ucodegen
    Participant

    1) I think the OP is trolling in this case. The account name was created just to post this.
    2) The referenced article is simplistic. Much more simplistic than a professor of Economics and Law should come up with. He took a something which had a surprisingly simple cure and spun it into a justification for something much more far reaching. The author also did not distinguish between regulation and the enforcement of existing regulation. There is a big difference between having regulation and not enforcing it versus not having the regulation in the first place.

    The cause of the whole financial collapse of cards is actually fairly simple. Risk was not correctly priced when it came to mortgage loans. Why?
    1) You had Congress tampering with risk pricing through Freddie and Fannie.
    2) Credit Default Swaps, which are really insurance policies, are not regulated as such. Credit Default Swaps are the sacred cows of the banking industry because they allow almost unlimited leverage.

    You can also expand this to include:
    3) Lack of basic financial knowledge on the part of most of the populace.
    4) Reduction in concepts of personal responsibility on the part of a large portion of the populace. (Entitlement generation).

    January 18, 2011 at 9:42 AM #655290
    briansd1
    Guest

    [quote=Rustico]I think the people in code enforcement that go around jacking people in an attempt to fund their jobs and pensions don’t think regulation is bad.[/quote]

    I actually agree with you, Rustico. Expecially in the case of departments that are funded by fees collected.

    January 18, 2011 at 9:42 AM #655352
    briansd1
    Guest

    [quote=Rustico]I think the people in code enforcement that go around jacking people in an attempt to fund their jobs and pensions don’t think regulation is bad.[/quote]

    I actually agree with you, Rustico. Expecially in the case of departments that are funded by fees collected.

    January 18, 2011 at 9:42 AM #655949
    briansd1
    Guest

    [quote=Rustico]I think the people in code enforcement that go around jacking people in an attempt to fund their jobs and pensions don’t think regulation is bad.[/quote]

    I actually agree with you, Rustico. Expecially in the case of departments that are funded by fees collected.

    January 18, 2011 at 9:42 AM #656088
    briansd1
    Guest

    [quote=Rustico]I think the people in code enforcement that go around jacking people in an attempt to fund their jobs and pensions don’t think regulation is bad.[/quote]

    I actually agree with you, Rustico. Expecially in the case of departments that are funded by fees collected.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 211 total)
1 2 3 … 13 14 15
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.