Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Greenspan – Very Dangerous Possibilities of Extending Bush Tax Cuts
- This topic has 100 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 1 month ago by
Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 27, 2010 at 9:05 AM #18000September 27, 2010 at 9:19 AM #609668
sdduuuude
ParticipantI agree – it is a decision between “terrible and catistrophic” though I’m not sure which is which.
I also agree that the spending side is the side to focus on. Ideally, spending would be cut enough that we could keep the tax credits in place AND stop borrowing. One can dream.
I’m not sure why Greenspan says we need to cut spending instead of taxes. It should really be the same thing, but since we are borrowing so much, I guess he is saying we should stop borrowing and raise taxes.
This is not screaming “bull housing market” to me.
September 27, 2010 at 9:19 AM #609756ParticipantI agree – it is a decision between “terrible and catistrophic” though I’m not sure which is which.
I also agree that the spending side is the side to focus on. Ideally, spending would be cut enough that we could keep the tax credits in place AND stop borrowing. One can dream.
I’m not sure why Greenspan says we need to cut spending instead of taxes. It should really be the same thing, but since we are borrowing so much, I guess he is saying we should stop borrowing and raise taxes.
This is not screaming “bull housing market” to me.
September 27, 2010 at 9:19 AM #610306ParticipantI agree – it is a decision between “terrible and catistrophic” though I’m not sure which is which.
I also agree that the spending side is the side to focus on. Ideally, spending would be cut enough that we could keep the tax credits in place AND stop borrowing. One can dream.
I’m not sure why Greenspan says we need to cut spending instead of taxes. It should really be the same thing, but since we are borrowing so much, I guess he is saying we should stop borrowing and raise taxes.
This is not screaming “bull housing market” to me.
September 27, 2010 at 9:19 AM #610416ParticipantI agree – it is a decision between “terrible and catistrophic” though I’m not sure which is which.
I also agree that the spending side is the side to focus on. Ideally, spending would be cut enough that we could keep the tax credits in place AND stop borrowing. One can dream.
I’m not sure why Greenspan says we need to cut spending instead of taxes. It should really be the same thing, but since we are borrowing so much, I guess he is saying we should stop borrowing and raise taxes.
This is not screaming “bull housing market” to me.
September 27, 2010 at 9:19 AM #610733ParticipantI agree – it is a decision between “terrible and catistrophic” though I’m not sure which is which.
I also agree that the spending side is the side to focus on. Ideally, spending would be cut enough that we could keep the tax credits in place AND stop borrowing. One can dream.
I’m not sure why Greenspan says we need to cut spending instead of taxes. It should really be the same thing, but since we are borrowing so much, I guess he is saying we should stop borrowing and raise taxes.
This is not screaming “bull housing market” to me.
September 27, 2010 at 10:16 AM #609683NotCranky
ParticipantFor decades now our country looks like a terrible reality show called “Battle of the Welfare Queens”. The contestants are racketeers, pimps and prostitutes, who have to put bribes and arrange or pull tricks, to see who gets hit by the pain train and who gets hit by a delicious cream puff. The studio audience gets splattered with blood while the try to catch frosting.
September 27, 2010 at 10:16 AM #609771ParticipantFor decades now our country looks like a terrible reality show called “Battle of the Welfare Queens”. The contestants are racketeers, pimps and prostitutes, who have to put bribes and arrange or pull tricks, to see who gets hit by the pain train and who gets hit by a delicious cream puff. The studio audience gets splattered with blood while the try to catch frosting.
September 27, 2010 at 10:16 AM #610320ParticipantFor decades now our country looks like a terrible reality show called “Battle of the Welfare Queens”. The contestants are racketeers, pimps and prostitutes, who have to put bribes and arrange or pull tricks, to see who gets hit by the pain train and who gets hit by a delicious cream puff. The studio audience gets splattered with blood while the try to catch frosting.
September 27, 2010 at 10:16 AM #610430ParticipantFor decades now our country looks like a terrible reality show called “Battle of the Welfare Queens”. The contestants are racketeers, pimps and prostitutes, who have to put bribes and arrange or pull tricks, to see who gets hit by the pain train and who gets hit by a delicious cream puff. The studio audience gets splattered with blood while the try to catch frosting.
September 27, 2010 at 10:16 AM #610748ParticipantFor decades now our country looks like a terrible reality show called “Battle of the Welfare Queens”. The contestants are racketeers, pimps and prostitutes, who have to put bribes and arrange or pull tricks, to see who gets hit by the pain train and who gets hit by a delicious cream puff. The studio audience gets splattered with blood while the try to catch frosting.
September 27, 2010 at 10:36 AM #609693ParticipantYes – we are playing “Let’s Make a Deal” and a goat waits behind each of the three doors. There is no “Brand New Car !”
September 27, 2010 at 10:36 AM #609781ParticipantYes – we are playing “Let’s Make a Deal” and a goat waits behind each of the three doors. There is no “Brand New Car !”
September 27, 2010 at 10:36 AM #610329ParticipantYes – we are playing “Let’s Make a Deal” and a goat waits behind each of the three doors. There is no “Brand New Car !”
September 27, 2010 at 10:36 AM #610440ParticipantYes – we are playing “Let’s Make a Deal” and a goat waits behind each of the three doors. There is no “Brand New Car !”
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.