Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › 4S Mello-Roos will take 30 more years (2040) to payoff
- This topic has 120 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 2 months ago by bearishgurl.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 16, 2010 at 5:08 PM #17958September 16, 2010 at 5:43 PM #605558desmondParticipant
If you own in 4S, I would keep it quiet, you would just be alerting future homeowners not to buy in 4s.
September 16, 2010 at 5:43 PM #605645desmondParticipantIf you own in 4S, I would keep it quiet, you would just be alerting future homeowners not to buy in 4s.
September 16, 2010 at 5:43 PM #606197desmondParticipantIf you own in 4S, I would keep it quiet, you would just be alerting future homeowners not to buy in 4s.
September 16, 2010 at 5:43 PM #606304desmondParticipantIf you own in 4S, I would keep it quiet, you would just be alerting future homeowners not to buy in 4s.
September 16, 2010 at 5:43 PM #606623desmondParticipantIf you own in 4S, I would keep it quiet, you would just be alerting future homeowners not to buy in 4s.
September 16, 2010 at 6:28 PM #605563bearishgurlParticipantIn the course of my business last month, a local realtor told me that some of the MR bonds in Otay Ranch (South County) also won’t be paid off for 40 years. I was incredulous when he said this but now not so much. From what I understand from this thread, the bulk of the 4S buyers did not initially understand the documents they signed at the time of signing. And the 4S salespeople did not bother to properly explain them. I’ve maintained all along that this practice of non-disclosure routinely happened in new development offices at the time of closing. Buyers were likely so enamored with purchasing *new* construction that they paid no attention to this small, but important detail, even if it was “glossed over” to them at the time of closing.
September 16, 2010 at 6:28 PM #605650bearishgurlParticipantIn the course of my business last month, a local realtor told me that some of the MR bonds in Otay Ranch (South County) also won’t be paid off for 40 years. I was incredulous when he said this but now not so much. From what I understand from this thread, the bulk of the 4S buyers did not initially understand the documents they signed at the time of signing. And the 4S salespeople did not bother to properly explain them. I’ve maintained all along that this practice of non-disclosure routinely happened in new development offices at the time of closing. Buyers were likely so enamored with purchasing *new* construction that they paid no attention to this small, but important detail, even if it was “glossed over” to them at the time of closing.
September 16, 2010 at 6:28 PM #606202bearishgurlParticipantIn the course of my business last month, a local realtor told me that some of the MR bonds in Otay Ranch (South County) also won’t be paid off for 40 years. I was incredulous when he said this but now not so much. From what I understand from this thread, the bulk of the 4S buyers did not initially understand the documents they signed at the time of signing. And the 4S salespeople did not bother to properly explain them. I’ve maintained all along that this practice of non-disclosure routinely happened in new development offices at the time of closing. Buyers were likely so enamored with purchasing *new* construction that they paid no attention to this small, but important detail, even if it was “glossed over” to them at the time of closing.
September 16, 2010 at 6:28 PM #606309bearishgurlParticipantIn the course of my business last month, a local realtor told me that some of the MR bonds in Otay Ranch (South County) also won’t be paid off for 40 years. I was incredulous when he said this but now not so much. From what I understand from this thread, the bulk of the 4S buyers did not initially understand the documents they signed at the time of signing. And the 4S salespeople did not bother to properly explain them. I’ve maintained all along that this practice of non-disclosure routinely happened in new development offices at the time of closing. Buyers were likely so enamored with purchasing *new* construction that they paid no attention to this small, but important detail, even if it was “glossed over” to them at the time of closing.
September 16, 2010 at 6:28 PM #606628bearishgurlParticipantIn the course of my business last month, a local realtor told me that some of the MR bonds in Otay Ranch (South County) also won’t be paid off for 40 years. I was incredulous when he said this but now not so much. From what I understand from this thread, the bulk of the 4S buyers did not initially understand the documents they signed at the time of signing. And the 4S salespeople did not bother to properly explain them. I’ve maintained all along that this practice of non-disclosure routinely happened in new development offices at the time of closing. Buyers were likely so enamored with purchasing *new* construction that they paid no attention to this small, but important detail, even if it was “glossed over” to them at the time of closing.
September 16, 2010 at 9:04 PM #605593equalizerParticipantOnly a tax lawyer working for GS could devise or understand something so egregious. How is thing any different than anything that happened in Bell?
Wait, the schools are still screaming poverty. Only in this state could you have this amount of taxation, yet PTA turns kids into marketing slaves first day of school.Where is that Tea Party when you need them?
September 16, 2010 at 9:04 PM #605680equalizerParticipantOnly a tax lawyer working for GS could devise or understand something so egregious. How is thing any different than anything that happened in Bell?
Wait, the schools are still screaming poverty. Only in this state could you have this amount of taxation, yet PTA turns kids into marketing slaves first day of school.Where is that Tea Party when you need them?
September 16, 2010 at 9:04 PM #606232equalizerParticipantOnly a tax lawyer working for GS could devise or understand something so egregious. How is thing any different than anything that happened in Bell?
Wait, the schools are still screaming poverty. Only in this state could you have this amount of taxation, yet PTA turns kids into marketing slaves first day of school.Where is that Tea Party when you need them?
September 16, 2010 at 9:04 PM #606339equalizerParticipantOnly a tax lawyer working for GS could devise or understand something so egregious. How is thing any different than anything that happened in Bell?
Wait, the schools are still screaming poverty. Only in this state could you have this amount of taxation, yet PTA turns kids into marketing slaves first day of school.Where is that Tea Party when you need them?
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.