- This topic has 200 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by
bearishgurl.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 15, 2010 at 11:27 AM #17949September 15, 2010 at 12:11 PM #604993
meadandale
ParticipantI have no sympathy for people like this and can’t understand those that do.
Her situation is entirely of her own doing. She borrowed HEAVILY against her home equity and when the shit hit the fan it’s everyone’s fault but hers.
September 15, 2010 at 12:11 PM #605081ParticipantI have no sympathy for people like this and can’t understand those that do.
Her situation is entirely of her own doing. She borrowed HEAVILY against her home equity and when the shit hit the fan it’s everyone’s fault but hers.
September 15, 2010 at 12:11 PM #605632ParticipantI have no sympathy for people like this and can’t understand those that do.
Her situation is entirely of her own doing. She borrowed HEAVILY against her home equity and when the shit hit the fan it’s everyone’s fault but hers.
September 15, 2010 at 12:11 PM #605739ParticipantI have no sympathy for people like this and can’t understand those that do.
Her situation is entirely of her own doing. She borrowed HEAVILY against her home equity and when the shit hit the fan it’s everyone’s fault but hers.
September 15, 2010 at 12:11 PM #606056ParticipantI have no sympathy for people like this and can’t understand those that do.
Her situation is entirely of her own doing. She borrowed HEAVILY against her home equity and when the shit hit the fan it’s everyone’s fault but hers.
September 15, 2010 at 12:53 PM #605008XBoxBoy
Participant[quote=deadzone]Apparently US Congressmen are publicly advocating theft.[/quote]
I’m shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIX_0nMlIBU
[quote=UnionTribune]she borrowed $539,000 against the home to help facilitate a divorce and pay off debt.[/quote]
She needed $539,000 to pay for her divorce and debts????? WTF. Unbelievable that the article just skims over that detail.
September 15, 2010 at 12:53 PM #605096Participant[quote=deadzone]Apparently US Congressmen are publicly advocating theft.[/quote]
I’m shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIX_0nMlIBU
[quote=UnionTribune]she borrowed $539,000 against the home to help facilitate a divorce and pay off debt.[/quote]
She needed $539,000 to pay for her divorce and debts????? WTF. Unbelievable that the article just skims over that detail.
September 15, 2010 at 12:53 PM #605647Participant[quote=deadzone]Apparently US Congressmen are publicly advocating theft.[/quote]
I’m shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIX_0nMlIBU
[quote=UnionTribune]she borrowed $539,000 against the home to help facilitate a divorce and pay off debt.[/quote]
She needed $539,000 to pay for her divorce and debts????? WTF. Unbelievable that the article just skims over that detail.
September 15, 2010 at 12:53 PM #605754Participant[quote=deadzone]Apparently US Congressmen are publicly advocating theft.[/quote]
I’m shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIX_0nMlIBU
[quote=UnionTribune]she borrowed $539,000 against the home to help facilitate a divorce and pay off debt.[/quote]
She needed $539,000 to pay for her divorce and debts????? WTF. Unbelievable that the article just skims over that detail.
September 15, 2010 at 12:53 PM #606071Participant[quote=deadzone]Apparently US Congressmen are publicly advocating theft.[/quote]
I’m shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIX_0nMlIBU
[quote=UnionTribune]she borrowed $539,000 against the home to help facilitate a divorce and pay off debt.[/quote]
She needed $539,000 to pay for her divorce and debts????? WTF. Unbelievable that the article just skims over that detail.
September 15, 2010 at 1:20 PM #605023DWCAP
ParticipantI saw that on the news last night. Filner was informed the day before the rally that the bank would not be taking the house. He begruggingly admitted that later on. That rally was all pomp and show, the bank had no intention of evicting her then, and they knew it.
But now what? She quit her job, has only a passive income, and little to no spousal support (I dont know, but it doesnt sound like much). How is she gonna pay this loan back? Or just pay her bills in general?
Simple answer is she isnt.
Everything else is extend, pretend, and deny. Thanks Rep Filner for making sure this draggs on and on.
I do hope her son gets better.
September 15, 2010 at 1:20 PM #605111ParticipantI saw that on the news last night. Filner was informed the day before the rally that the bank would not be taking the house. He begruggingly admitted that later on. That rally was all pomp and show, the bank had no intention of evicting her then, and they knew it.
But now what? She quit her job, has only a passive income, and little to no spousal support (I dont know, but it doesnt sound like much). How is she gonna pay this loan back? Or just pay her bills in general?
Simple answer is she isnt.
Everything else is extend, pretend, and deny. Thanks Rep Filner for making sure this draggs on and on.
I do hope her son gets better.
September 15, 2010 at 1:20 PM #605662ParticipantI saw that on the news last night. Filner was informed the day before the rally that the bank would not be taking the house. He begruggingly admitted that later on. That rally was all pomp and show, the bank had no intention of evicting her then, and they knew it.
But now what? She quit her job, has only a passive income, and little to no spousal support (I dont know, but it doesnt sound like much). How is she gonna pay this loan back? Or just pay her bills in general?
Simple answer is she isnt.
Everything else is extend, pretend, and deny. Thanks Rep Filner for making sure this draggs on and on.
I do hope her son gets better.
September 15, 2010 at 1:20 PM #605769ParticipantI saw that on the news last night. Filner was informed the day before the rally that the bank would not be taking the house. He begruggingly admitted that later on. That rally was all pomp and show, the bank had no intention of evicting her then, and they knew it.
But now what? She quit her job, has only a passive income, and little to no spousal support (I dont know, but it doesnt sound like much). How is she gonna pay this loan back? Or just pay her bills in general?
Simple answer is she isnt.
Everything else is extend, pretend, and deny. Thanks Rep Filner for making sure this draggs on and on.
I do hope her son gets better.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.