- This topic has 30 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 3 months ago by (former)FormerSanDiegan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 4, 2010 at 7:38 PM #17795August 5, 2010 at 7:14 AM #586737desmondParticipant
If the title was “San Diego Home Prices to Drop Weight” you would have had 7 pages of comments. A “Gay” comment would also help.
August 5, 2010 at 7:14 AM #586829desmondParticipantIf the title was “San Diego Home Prices to Drop Weight” you would have had 7 pages of comments. A “Gay” comment would also help.
August 5, 2010 at 7:14 AM #587776desmondParticipantIf the title was “San Diego Home Prices to Drop Weight” you would have had 7 pages of comments. A “Gay” comment would also help.
August 5, 2010 at 7:14 AM #587471desmondParticipantIf the title was “San Diego Home Prices to Drop Weight” you would have had 7 pages of comments. A “Gay” comment would also help.
August 5, 2010 at 7:14 AM #587363desmondParticipantIf the title was “San Diego Home Prices to Drop Weight” you would have had 7 pages of comments. A “Gay” comment would also help.
August 5, 2010 at 8:22 AM #586747(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantThe source for the prediction (FISERV) in the article predicted a 1.3% decline from April 2007 to April 2008, per the link below.
How did they do ?
The San Diego market declined by ~ 20% in the ensuing 12 months. The average decline PER MONTH was about equal to their precited annual decline.
They published their prediction on the cusp of the most precipitous 18-month decline in San Diego history and completely missed it … by more than an order of magnitude.Why should we put any weight on their current predictions ?
linky …
http://money.cnn.com/2007/04/09/real_estate/forecast.moneymag/index.htm
August 5, 2010 at 8:22 AM #586839(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantThe source for the prediction (FISERV) in the article predicted a 1.3% decline from April 2007 to April 2008, per the link below.
How did they do ?
The San Diego market declined by ~ 20% in the ensuing 12 months. The average decline PER MONTH was about equal to their precited annual decline.
They published their prediction on the cusp of the most precipitous 18-month decline in San Diego history and completely missed it … by more than an order of magnitude.Why should we put any weight on their current predictions ?
linky …
http://money.cnn.com/2007/04/09/real_estate/forecast.moneymag/index.htm
August 5, 2010 at 8:22 AM #587786(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantThe source for the prediction (FISERV) in the article predicted a 1.3% decline from April 2007 to April 2008, per the link below.
How did they do ?
The San Diego market declined by ~ 20% in the ensuing 12 months. The average decline PER MONTH was about equal to their precited annual decline.
They published their prediction on the cusp of the most precipitous 18-month decline in San Diego history and completely missed it … by more than an order of magnitude.Why should we put any weight on their current predictions ?
linky …
http://money.cnn.com/2007/04/09/real_estate/forecast.moneymag/index.htm
August 5, 2010 at 8:22 AM #587481(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantThe source for the prediction (FISERV) in the article predicted a 1.3% decline from April 2007 to April 2008, per the link below.
How did they do ?
The San Diego market declined by ~ 20% in the ensuing 12 months. The average decline PER MONTH was about equal to their precited annual decline.
They published their prediction on the cusp of the most precipitous 18-month decline in San Diego history and completely missed it … by more than an order of magnitude.Why should we put any weight on their current predictions ?
linky …
http://money.cnn.com/2007/04/09/real_estate/forecast.moneymag/index.htm
August 5, 2010 at 8:22 AM #587373(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantThe source for the prediction (FISERV) in the article predicted a 1.3% decline from April 2007 to April 2008, per the link below.
How did they do ?
The San Diego market declined by ~ 20% in the ensuing 12 months. The average decline PER MONTH was about equal to their precited annual decline.
They published their prediction on the cusp of the most precipitous 18-month decline in San Diego history and completely missed it … by more than an order of magnitude.Why should we put any weight on their current predictions ?
linky …
http://money.cnn.com/2007/04/09/real_estate/forecast.moneymag/index.htm
August 5, 2010 at 8:57 AM #587398sdduuuudeParticipantI find the title of this thread very funny, given that it appears on this blog. I mean – no kidding it was predicted with all the bears around here. Not saying it’s a bad post. Just a funny title.
August 5, 2010 at 8:57 AM #587811sdduuuudeParticipantI find the title of this thread very funny, given that it appears on this blog. I mean – no kidding it was predicted with all the bears around here. Not saying it’s a bad post. Just a funny title.
August 5, 2010 at 8:57 AM #587505sdduuuudeParticipantI find the title of this thread very funny, given that it appears on this blog. I mean – no kidding it was predicted with all the bears around here. Not saying it’s a bad post. Just a funny title.
August 5, 2010 at 8:57 AM #586864sdduuuudeParticipantI find the title of this thread very funny, given that it appears on this blog. I mean – no kidding it was predicted with all the bears around here. Not saying it’s a bad post. Just a funny title.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.