- This topic has 90 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 3 months ago by kicksavedave.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 26, 2010 at 11:24 PM #17756July 27, 2010 at 1:15 AM #583614CA renterParticipant
Isn’t that pretty much what they’re already doing? Sounds to me like everyone from the President to Bernanke on down is insisting that nobody lose money on housing.
That’s why all us renters are being forced to keep renting (either that, or seriously overpay for a house)…so the deadbeats can live for free and pretend that their houses are worth what they were in 2005. In the meantime, we get to collect sub-1% interest on our savings. It’s all good.
July 27, 2010 at 1:15 AM #583721CA renterParticipantIsn’t that pretty much what they’re already doing? Sounds to me like everyone from the President to Bernanke on down is insisting that nobody lose money on housing.
That’s why all us renters are being forced to keep renting (either that, or seriously overpay for a house)…so the deadbeats can live for free and pretend that their houses are worth what they were in 2005. In the meantime, we get to collect sub-1% interest on our savings. It’s all good.
July 27, 2010 at 1:15 AM #583079CA renterParticipantIsn’t that pretty much what they’re already doing? Sounds to me like everyone from the President to Bernanke on down is insisting that nobody lose money on housing.
That’s why all us renters are being forced to keep renting (either that, or seriously overpay for a house)…so the deadbeats can live for free and pretend that their houses are worth what they were in 2005. In the meantime, we get to collect sub-1% interest on our savings. It’s all good.
July 27, 2010 at 1:15 AM #584025CA renterParticipantIsn’t that pretty much what they’re already doing? Sounds to me like everyone from the President to Bernanke on down is insisting that nobody lose money on housing.
That’s why all us renters are being forced to keep renting (either that, or seriously overpay for a house)…so the deadbeats can live for free and pretend that their houses are worth what they were in 2005. In the meantime, we get to collect sub-1% interest on our savings. It’s all good.
July 27, 2010 at 1:15 AM #582987CA renterParticipantIsn’t that pretty much what they’re already doing? Sounds to me like everyone from the President to Bernanke on down is insisting that nobody lose money on housing.
That’s why all us renters are being forced to keep renting (either that, or seriously overpay for a house)…so the deadbeats can live for free and pretend that their houses are worth what they were in 2005. In the meantime, we get to collect sub-1% interest on our savings. It’s all good.
July 27, 2010 at 7:05 AM #584070scaredyclassicParticipantI agree; but why not make it explicit. He’ll even I’d buy a house. Since the game is rigged anyway why pretend. Just firmly put in a bottom make it a requirement u live there 5 years and prices will remain high and sales will occur without the govt spending Amy money down
FDIC type insurance for housing
July 27, 2010 at 7:05 AM #583032scaredyclassicParticipantI agree; but why not make it explicit. He’ll even I’d buy a house. Since the game is rigged anyway why pretend. Just firmly put in a bottom make it a requirement u live there 5 years and prices will remain high and sales will occur without the govt spending Amy money down
FDIC type insurance for housing
July 27, 2010 at 7:05 AM #583124scaredyclassicParticipantI agree; but why not make it explicit. He’ll even I’d buy a house. Since the game is rigged anyway why pretend. Just firmly put in a bottom make it a requirement u live there 5 years and prices will remain high and sales will occur without the govt spending Amy money down
FDIC type insurance for housing
July 27, 2010 at 7:05 AM #583766scaredyclassicParticipantI agree; but why not make it explicit. He’ll even I’d buy a house. Since the game is rigged anyway why pretend. Just firmly put in a bottom make it a requirement u live there 5 years and prices will remain high and sales will occur without the govt spending Amy money down
FDIC type insurance for housing
July 27, 2010 at 7:05 AM #583659scaredyclassicParticipantI agree; but why not make it explicit. He’ll even I’d buy a house. Since the game is rigged anyway why pretend. Just firmly put in a bottom make it a requirement u live there 5 years and prices will remain high and sales will occur without the govt spending Amy money down
FDIC type insurance for housing
July 27, 2010 at 7:42 AM #583042carlsbadworkerParticipantPeople need to understand: foreclosure is not the problem; foreclosure is the solution.
A housing bust is only devastating because it reflects the huge mis-allocation of capital during the housing boom.July 27, 2010 at 7:42 AM #584080carlsbadworkerParticipantPeople need to understand: foreclosure is not the problem; foreclosure is the solution.
A housing bust is only devastating because it reflects the huge mis-allocation of capital during the housing boom.July 27, 2010 at 7:42 AM #583776carlsbadworkerParticipantPeople need to understand: foreclosure is not the problem; foreclosure is the solution.
A housing bust is only devastating because it reflects the huge mis-allocation of capital during the housing boom.July 27, 2010 at 7:42 AM #583134carlsbadworkerParticipantPeople need to understand: foreclosure is not the problem; foreclosure is the solution.
A housing bust is only devastating because it reflects the huge mis-allocation of capital during the housing boom. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.