- This topic has 90 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 2 months ago by
patb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 23, 2010 at 9:27 AM #17744July 23, 2010 at 10:06 AM #581695
ybitz
Participantc’mon, there was no murder; they committed suicide unnecessarily. There was no need to kill yourself because you are broke. We don’t know all the details, but the article did say that they filed for bankruptcy but withdrew it.
You know who got screwed? The people that bought the foreclosure. A pair of suicides has gotta hurt the house value.
July 23, 2010 at 10:06 AM #581786Participantc’mon, there was no murder; they committed suicide unnecessarily. There was no need to kill yourself because you are broke. We don’t know all the details, but the article did say that they filed for bankruptcy but withdrew it.
You know who got screwed? The people that bought the foreclosure. A pair of suicides has gotta hurt the house value.
July 23, 2010 at 10:06 AM #582318Participantc’mon, there was no murder; they committed suicide unnecessarily. There was no need to kill yourself because you are broke. We don’t know all the details, but the article did say that they filed for bankruptcy but withdrew it.
You know who got screwed? The people that bought the foreclosure. A pair of suicides has gotta hurt the house value.
July 23, 2010 at 10:06 AM #582425Participantc’mon, there was no murder; they committed suicide unnecessarily. There was no need to kill yourself because you are broke. We don’t know all the details, but the article did say that they filed for bankruptcy but withdrew it.
You know who got screwed? The people that bought the foreclosure. A pair of suicides has gotta hurt the house value.
July 23, 2010 at 10:06 AM #582727Participantc’mon, there was no murder; they committed suicide unnecessarily. There was no need to kill yourself because you are broke. We don’t know all the details, but the article did say that they filed for bankruptcy but withdrew it.
You know who got screwed? The people that bought the foreclosure. A pair of suicides has gotta hurt the house value.
July 23, 2010 at 10:17 AM #581700briansd1
GuestSounds like they were living on equity extraction.
Some loan shyster probably refied them several times already and told them they could refi again and again.
They have not been positively identified but were believed to be Therese Christenson, 83, and her son, Gary “Axel” Christenson, 46, who had lived for decades in the house that was sold at a foreclosure auction in June.
July 23, 2010 at 10:17 AM #582323GuestSounds like they were living on equity extraction.
Some loan shyster probably refied them several times already and told them they could refi again and again.
They have not been positively identified but were believed to be Therese Christenson, 83, and her son, Gary “Axel” Christenson, 46, who had lived for decades in the house that was sold at a foreclosure auction in June.
July 23, 2010 at 10:17 AM #581791GuestSounds like they were living on equity extraction.
Some loan shyster probably refied them several times already and told them they could refi again and again.
They have not been positively identified but were believed to be Therese Christenson, 83, and her son, Gary “Axel” Christenson, 46, who had lived for decades in the house that was sold at a foreclosure auction in June.
July 23, 2010 at 10:17 AM #582430GuestSounds like they were living on equity extraction.
Some loan shyster probably refied them several times already and told them they could refi again and again.
They have not been positively identified but were believed to be Therese Christenson, 83, and her son, Gary “Axel” Christenson, 46, who had lived for decades in the house that was sold at a foreclosure auction in June.
July 23, 2010 at 10:17 AM #582732GuestSounds like they were living on equity extraction.
Some loan shyster probably refied them several times already and told them they could refi again and again.
They have not been positively identified but were believed to be Therese Christenson, 83, and her son, Gary “Axel” Christenson, 46, who had lived for decades in the house that was sold at a foreclosure auction in June.
July 23, 2010 at 10:18 AM #582328GuestThe investors who bought at auction gambled and lost. Comes with the territory. No big deal.
A winning bid of $267,100 was made for Christenson’s property at public auction June 3, with unpaid debt and costs of $173,228, county records show. Court records show the first of two five-day notices to vacate the house were served June 4.
July 23, 2010 at 10:18 AM #582435GuestThe investors who bought at auction gambled and lost. Comes with the territory. No big deal.
A winning bid of $267,100 was made for Christenson’s property at public auction June 3, with unpaid debt and costs of $173,228, county records show. Court records show the first of two five-day notices to vacate the house were served June 4.
July 23, 2010 at 10:18 AM #582737GuestThe investors who bought at auction gambled and lost. Comes with the territory. No big deal.
A winning bid of $267,100 was made for Christenson’s property at public auction June 3, with unpaid debt and costs of $173,228, county records show. Court records show the first of two five-day notices to vacate the house were served June 4.
July 23, 2010 at 10:18 AM #581796GuestThe investors who bought at auction gambled and lost. Comes with the territory. No big deal.
A winning bid of $267,100 was made for Christenson’s property at public auction June 3, with unpaid debt and costs of $173,228, county records show. Court records show the first of two five-day notices to vacate the house were served June 4.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.