- This topic has 80 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by
cyphire.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 8, 2010 at 7:38 PM #17677July 8, 2010 at 8:03 PM #576361
moneymaker
ParticipantNo surprise there. Would you expect anything else?
July 8, 2010 at 8:03 PM #576458moneymaker
ParticipantNo surprise there. Would you expect anything else?
July 8, 2010 at 8:03 PM #576982moneymaker
ParticipantNo surprise there. Would you expect anything else?
July 8, 2010 at 8:03 PM #577088moneymaker
ParticipantNo surprise there. Would you expect anything else?
July 8, 2010 at 8:03 PM #577389moneymaker
ParticipantNo surprise there. Would you expect anything else?
July 8, 2010 at 8:08 PM #576366mydogsarelazy
ParticipantA very significant trend, and it will snowball.
JS
July 8, 2010 at 8:08 PM #576463mydogsarelazy
ParticipantA very significant trend, and it will snowball.
JS
July 8, 2010 at 8:08 PM #576987mydogsarelazy
ParticipantA very significant trend, and it will snowball.
JS
July 8, 2010 at 8:08 PM #577093mydogsarelazy
ParticipantA very significant trend, and it will snowball.
JS
July 8, 2010 at 8:08 PM #577394mydogsarelazy
ParticipantA very significant trend, and it will snowball.
JS
July 8, 2010 at 8:13 PM #576371poorgradstudent
ParticipantThis certainly goes against a big part of the media narrative (both left and right) about defaults. The leftwing coverage focused more on predatory lending while the right focused more on demonizing Freddie/Fannie. This study is looking more at actual defaults rather than being underwater.
Plus, let’s face it, it’s much easier to downgrade from a 1.5m home to a 800k home than it is to go from 500k to 300k. Lot of “want” vs. “need”.
July 8, 2010 at 8:13 PM #576468poorgradstudent
ParticipantThis certainly goes against a big part of the media narrative (both left and right) about defaults. The leftwing coverage focused more on predatory lending while the right focused more on demonizing Freddie/Fannie. This study is looking more at actual defaults rather than being underwater.
Plus, let’s face it, it’s much easier to downgrade from a 1.5m home to a 800k home than it is to go from 500k to 300k. Lot of “want” vs. “need”.
July 8, 2010 at 8:13 PM #576992poorgradstudent
ParticipantThis certainly goes against a big part of the media narrative (both left and right) about defaults. The leftwing coverage focused more on predatory lending while the right focused more on demonizing Freddie/Fannie. This study is looking more at actual defaults rather than being underwater.
Plus, let’s face it, it’s much easier to downgrade from a 1.5m home to a 800k home than it is to go from 500k to 300k. Lot of “want” vs. “need”.
July 8, 2010 at 8:13 PM #577098poorgradstudent
ParticipantThis certainly goes against a big part of the media narrative (both left and right) about defaults. The leftwing coverage focused more on predatory lending while the right focused more on demonizing Freddie/Fannie. This study is looking more at actual defaults rather than being underwater.
Plus, let’s face it, it’s much easier to downgrade from a 1.5m home to a 800k home than it is to go from 500k to 300k. Lot of “want” vs. “need”.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
