Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Stimulus I can live with
- This topic has 25 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 5 months ago by
AK.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 3, 2010 at 8:24 PM #17667July 4, 2010 at 12:46 AM #575276
CA renter
ParticipantAgreed. If we’re going to be spending taxpayers’ money, it should be used to create useful jobs instead of pumping up asset prices.
July 4, 2010 at 12:46 AM #576304ParticipantAgreed. If we’re going to be spending taxpayers’ money, it should be used to create useful jobs instead of pumping up asset prices.
July 4, 2010 at 12:46 AM #575373ParticipantAgreed. If we’re going to be spending taxpayers’ money, it should be used to create useful jobs instead of pumping up asset prices.
July 4, 2010 at 12:46 AM #576003ParticipantAgreed. If we’re going to be spending taxpayers’ money, it should be used to create useful jobs instead of pumping up asset prices.
July 4, 2010 at 12:46 AM #575897ParticipantAgreed. If we’re going to be spending taxpayers’ money, it should be used to create useful jobs instead of pumping up asset prices.
July 4, 2010 at 1:07 AM #575281gandalf
ParticipantDitto.
I think stimulus efforts should concentrate on energy research, development, conservation, transportation, infrastructure upgrades, etc. I expect the next leg up in the economy will coincide with changes in the energy paradigm.
July 4, 2010 at 1:07 AM #576309ParticipantDitto.
I think stimulus efforts should concentrate on energy research, development, conservation, transportation, infrastructure upgrades, etc. I expect the next leg up in the economy will coincide with changes in the energy paradigm.
July 4, 2010 at 1:07 AM #575378ParticipantDitto.
I think stimulus efforts should concentrate on energy research, development, conservation, transportation, infrastructure upgrades, etc. I expect the next leg up in the economy will coincide with changes in the energy paradigm.
July 4, 2010 at 1:07 AM #576008ParticipantDitto.
I think stimulus efforts should concentrate on energy research, development, conservation, transportation, infrastructure upgrades, etc. I expect the next leg up in the economy will coincide with changes in the energy paradigm.
July 4, 2010 at 1:07 AM #575902ParticipantDitto.
I think stimulus efforts should concentrate on energy research, development, conservation, transportation, infrastructure upgrades, etc. I expect the next leg up in the economy will coincide with changes in the energy paradigm.
July 4, 2010 at 8:29 AM #575912joec
ParticipantThe main problem with governments picking winners and losers is the game isn’t fair already. As you’ve probably seen, T. Boone Pickens has invested insanely in things such as wind power and has been buying up wind farms, technologies, lobbying/influencing governments to force them to use more wind, etc…by passing laws.
I don’t think helping a multi-billionaire with stimulus that he is lobbying and banking on to make himself even more wealthy sounds right.
It’s one thing for the Tesla CEO to use his own funds and near bankrupt himself to do something new, but some billionaire trying to buy up something, then influence our governments to pass laws and stimulus for just 1 sector isn’t a good thing.
The main point is that a lot of this is extremely complex and there is no black/white answer.
July 4, 2010 at 8:29 AM #576319ParticipantThe main problem with governments picking winners and losers is the game isn’t fair already. As you’ve probably seen, T. Boone Pickens has invested insanely in things such as wind power and has been buying up wind farms, technologies, lobbying/influencing governments to force them to use more wind, etc…by passing laws.
I don’t think helping a multi-billionaire with stimulus that he is lobbying and banking on to make himself even more wealthy sounds right.
It’s one thing for the Tesla CEO to use his own funds and near bankrupt himself to do something new, but some billionaire trying to buy up something, then influence our governments to pass laws and stimulus for just 1 sector isn’t a good thing.
The main point is that a lot of this is extremely complex and there is no black/white answer.
July 4, 2010 at 8:29 AM #576018ParticipantThe main problem with governments picking winners and losers is the game isn’t fair already. As you’ve probably seen, T. Boone Pickens has invested insanely in things such as wind power and has been buying up wind farms, technologies, lobbying/influencing governments to force them to use more wind, etc…by passing laws.
I don’t think helping a multi-billionaire with stimulus that he is lobbying and banking on to make himself even more wealthy sounds right.
It’s one thing for the Tesla CEO to use his own funds and near bankrupt himself to do something new, but some billionaire trying to buy up something, then influence our governments to pass laws and stimulus for just 1 sector isn’t a good thing.
The main point is that a lot of this is extremely complex and there is no black/white answer.
July 4, 2010 at 8:29 AM #575388ParticipantThe main problem with governments picking winners and losers is the game isn’t fair already. As you’ve probably seen, T. Boone Pickens has invested insanely in things such as wind power and has been buying up wind farms, technologies, lobbying/influencing governments to force them to use more wind, etc…by passing laws.
I don’t think helping a multi-billionaire with stimulus that he is lobbying and banking on to make himself even more wealthy sounds right.
It’s one thing for the Tesla CEO to use his own funds and near bankrupt himself to do something new, but some billionaire trying to buy up something, then influence our governments to pass laws and stimulus for just 1 sector isn’t a good thing.
The main point is that a lot of this is extremely complex and there is no black/white answer.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.