- This topic has 115 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 5 months ago by CAwireman.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 16, 2010 at 11:56 AM #17461May 17, 2010 at 11:59 AM #550881abellParticipant
So far, I’ve only researched how I am going to vote on the state propositions. And, unless new information comes to light on these, I will vote no on all except for I will vote yes on 13 and I am undecided on 17. With 17, I think it might be a good idea (since I always have diver’s insurance anyways), but I am wary of something sponsored by a car insurance company, and I am afraid I might be not have understood all the consequences.
May 17, 2010 at 11:59 AM #550989abellParticipantSo far, I’ve only researched how I am going to vote on the state propositions. And, unless new information comes to light on these, I will vote no on all except for I will vote yes on 13 and I am undecided on 17. With 17, I think it might be a good idea (since I always have diver’s insurance anyways), but I am wary of something sponsored by a car insurance company, and I am afraid I might be not have understood all the consequences.
May 17, 2010 at 11:59 AM #551476abellParticipantSo far, I’ve only researched how I am going to vote on the state propositions. And, unless new information comes to light on these, I will vote no on all except for I will vote yes on 13 and I am undecided on 17. With 17, I think it might be a good idea (since I always have diver’s insurance anyways), but I am wary of something sponsored by a car insurance company, and I am afraid I might be not have understood all the consequences.
May 17, 2010 at 11:59 AM #551575abellParticipantSo far, I’ve only researched how I am going to vote on the state propositions. And, unless new information comes to light on these, I will vote no on all except for I will vote yes on 13 and I am undecided on 17. With 17, I think it might be a good idea (since I always have diver’s insurance anyways), but I am wary of something sponsored by a car insurance company, and I am afraid I might be not have understood all the consequences.
May 17, 2010 at 11:59 AM #551853abellParticipantSo far, I’ve only researched how I am going to vote on the state propositions. And, unless new information comes to light on these, I will vote no on all except for I will vote yes on 13 and I am undecided on 17. With 17, I think it might be a good idea (since I always have diver’s insurance anyways), but I am wary of something sponsored by a car insurance company, and I am afraid I might be not have understood all the consequences.
May 17, 2010 at 10:04 PM #551162RicechexParticipantBump. I am also interested in responses on this.
May 17, 2010 at 10:04 PM #551269RicechexParticipantBump. I am also interested in responses on this.
May 17, 2010 at 10:04 PM #551756RicechexParticipantBump. I am also interested in responses on this.
May 17, 2010 at 10:04 PM #551855RicechexParticipantBump. I am also interested in responses on this.
May 17, 2010 at 10:04 PM #552133RicechexParticipantBump. I am also interested in responses on this.
May 17, 2010 at 10:42 PM #551177CAwiremanParticipantFor Gov, I’m thinking we need a Pete Wilson like Republican to help get things cleaned up budget wise. Thinking Meg….
May 17, 2010 at 10:42 PM #551284CAwiremanParticipantFor Gov, I’m thinking we need a Pete Wilson like Republican to help get things cleaned up budget wise. Thinking Meg….
May 17, 2010 at 10:42 PM #551771CAwiremanParticipantFor Gov, I’m thinking we need a Pete Wilson like Republican to help get things cleaned up budget wise. Thinking Meg….
May 17, 2010 at 10:42 PM #551870CAwiremanParticipantFor Gov, I’m thinking we need a Pete Wilson like Republican to help get things cleaned up budget wise. Thinking Meg….
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.