Menu

Home › Forums › Housing › Housing Market Sure to Double-Dip: Meredith Whitney

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 31 total)
1 2 3
  • Author
    Posts
  • March 17, 2010 at 12:28 PM #17218
    Arraya
    Participant

    http://www.cnbc.com/id/35887306

    The US housing market will face another retreat while mortgage-backed securities and Treasurys are likely to go through a “material” correction, Meredith Whitney, CEO of Meredith Whitney Advisory Group, told CNBC Tuesday.

    “The housing market surely will double dip,” Whitney told “Worldwide Exchange.”

    Government programs to support housing have been “murky” and when the modifications caused by them come to an end, a lot of supply may come to the market and that’s when the real-estate market is likely to go down, she explained.

    Hopes that an improvement in liquidity and continuing investment from China in US assets will prop up mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and Treasurys are exaggerated, Whitney also said.

    “The asset classes of MBS and Treasurys are priced for a material correction in my opinion,” she said. “The only buyers of agency MBS are the Fed and banks so you see how precarious that market is.”

    “If the Fed pulls back, that’s a really big deal… because there’s no substitute buyer.”

    Banks Model Is Broken

    The Federal Reserve can’t make banks start lending again because the business model financial institutions used before the crisis is broken, Whitney also said.

    “I don’t think there’s much the Fed can do to get banks to start lending again. That’s a structural problem, the model is broken,” Whitney told “Worldwide Exchange.”

    Before the financial crisis erupted in 2007 banks were able to offer customers low-priced mortgages because they were making money on securitizing these mortgages and selling them on, she explained.

    But now that the securitization market is effectively closed, the prices of mortgages for consumers have not risen to compensate banks for that loss of revenue, so banks have been playing defense for the past two years, Whitney added.

    The Federal Open Market Committee holds a meeting later Tuesday to decide on monetary policy. Fed officials have been saying that interest rates are likely to remain low for an “extended” period of time.

    RELATED LINKS
    Let Regulators Do Their Job: BoveBarclays Wanted UBS: ReportLehman Plans to End BankruptcyBig Banks vs. Regionals
    Whitney said she will be watching for anything regarding the Fed’s stance on buying mortgage-backed securities in the statement after the meeting.

    “The Fed has been supporting the housing market, a third of the Fed’s balance sheet is tied to mortgages,” she said.

    “The banks aren’t issuing anything (in terms of mortgages) to hold, they’re issuing everything to dump on” Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae, Whitney added.

    Much of the profit banks made last year was due to their performance in capital markets and this is “unreplicable” this year, Whitney also warned.

    “I think that people that expect an earnings handoff to a normalized scenario are going to be disappointed,” she said.

    “Normal will not be what it has been over the last 20 years and there’s disappointment baked into that.”

    March 17, 2010 at 1:00 PM #526861
    jpinpb
    Participant

    Yeah. She also something about delaying the pain and how unsuccessful the loan mods have been. The way things are out there, it “seems” things are moving along okay. Of course we know all that’s been done to give this appearance. It’ll be interesting to see what happens.

    March 17, 2010 at 1:00 PM #527797
    jpinpb
    Participant

    Yeah. She also something about delaying the pain and how unsuccessful the loan mods have been. The way things are out there, it “seems” things are moving along okay. Of course we know all that’s been done to give this appearance. It’ll be interesting to see what happens.

    March 17, 2010 at 1:00 PM #526994
    jpinpb
    Participant

    Yeah. She also something about delaying the pain and how unsuccessful the loan mods have been. The way things are out there, it “seems” things are moving along okay. Of course we know all that’s been done to give this appearance. It’ll be interesting to see what happens.

    March 17, 2010 at 1:00 PM #527538
    jpinpb
    Participant

    Yeah. She also something about delaying the pain and how unsuccessful the loan mods have been. The way things are out there, it “seems” things are moving along okay. Of course we know all that’s been done to give this appearance. It’ll be interesting to see what happens.

    March 17, 2010 at 1:00 PM #527441
    jpinpb
    Participant

    Yeah. She also something about delaying the pain and how unsuccessful the loan mods have been. The way things are out there, it “seems” things are moving along okay. Of course we know all that’s been done to give this appearance. It’ll be interesting to see what happens.

    March 17, 2010 at 1:28 PM #526886
    clearfund
    Participant

    So far she’s called this financial/banking/housing scenario very accurately. Last summer she called the rise in housing activity/prices “a big headfake” and it seems to have been pretty smart and insightful.

    She is definately someone whose commentary should be included/considered when formulating your own view of the housing world these days.

    March 17, 2010 at 1:28 PM #527822
    clearfund
    Participant

    So far she’s called this financial/banking/housing scenario very accurately. Last summer she called the rise in housing activity/prices “a big headfake” and it seems to have been pretty smart and insightful.

    She is definately someone whose commentary should be included/considered when formulating your own view of the housing world these days.

    March 17, 2010 at 1:28 PM #527019
    clearfund
    Participant

    So far she’s called this financial/banking/housing scenario very accurately. Last summer she called the rise in housing activity/prices “a big headfake” and it seems to have been pretty smart and insightful.

    She is definately someone whose commentary should be included/considered when formulating your own view of the housing world these days.

    March 17, 2010 at 1:28 PM #527563
    clearfund
    Participant

    So far she’s called this financial/banking/housing scenario very accurately. Last summer she called the rise in housing activity/prices “a big headfake” and it seems to have been pretty smart and insightful.

    She is definately someone whose commentary should be included/considered when formulating your own view of the housing world these days.

    March 17, 2010 at 1:28 PM #527466
    clearfund
    Participant

    So far she’s called this financial/banking/housing scenario very accurately. Last summer she called the rise in housing activity/prices “a big headfake” and it seems to have been pretty smart and insightful.

    She is definately someone whose commentary should be included/considered when formulating your own view of the housing world these days.

    March 17, 2010 at 3:46 PM #527497
    davelj
    Participant

    [quote=clearfund]So far she’s called this financial/banking/housing scenario very accurately. [/quote]

    She’s done a very good job with the fundamentals and made folks a lot of money until March of last year. But she, along with many others, underestimated the will of the Officialdom to prime the pump. And folks who have followed her investment advice since March of last year have been clobbered. Destroyed. Which is why you haven’t seen much of her lately.

    Don’t get me wrong, fundamentally she’s been fairly accurate. Which is super. But the financial markets operate on a what-have-you-done-for-me-lately basis. And all she’s really done for anyone lately is lost them a shitpile of money.

    Doesn’t mean she won’t have her day again sometime in the future, though.

    March 17, 2010 at 3:46 PM #527852
    davelj
    Participant

    [quote=clearfund]So far she’s called this financial/banking/housing scenario very accurately. [/quote]

    She’s done a very good job with the fundamentals and made folks a lot of money until March of last year. But she, along with many others, underestimated the will of the Officialdom to prime the pump. And folks who have followed her investment advice since March of last year have been clobbered. Destroyed. Which is why you haven’t seen much of her lately.

    Don’t get me wrong, fundamentally she’s been fairly accurate. Which is super. But the financial markets operate on a what-have-you-done-for-me-lately basis. And all she’s really done for anyone lately is lost them a shitpile of money.

    Doesn’t mean she won’t have her day again sometime in the future, though.

    March 17, 2010 at 3:46 PM #527594
    davelj
    Participant

    [quote=clearfund]So far she’s called this financial/banking/housing scenario very accurately. [/quote]

    She’s done a very good job with the fundamentals and made folks a lot of money until March of last year. But she, along with many others, underestimated the will of the Officialdom to prime the pump. And folks who have followed her investment advice since March of last year have been clobbered. Destroyed. Which is why you haven’t seen much of her lately.

    Don’t get me wrong, fundamentally she’s been fairly accurate. Which is super. But the financial markets operate on a what-have-you-done-for-me-lately basis. And all she’s really done for anyone lately is lost them a shitpile of money.

    Doesn’t mean she won’t have her day again sometime in the future, though.

    March 17, 2010 at 3:46 PM #527049
    davelj
    Participant

    [quote=clearfund]So far she’s called this financial/banking/housing scenario very accurately. [/quote]

    She’s done a very good job with the fundamentals and made folks a lot of money until March of last year. But she, along with many others, underestimated the will of the Officialdom to prime the pump. And folks who have followed her investment advice since March of last year have been clobbered. Destroyed. Which is why you haven’t seen much of her lately.

    Don’t get me wrong, fundamentally she’s been fairly accurate. Which is super. But the financial markets operate on a what-have-you-done-for-me-lately basis. And all she’s really done for anyone lately is lost them a shitpile of money.

    Doesn’t mean she won’t have her day again sometime in the future, though.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 31 total)
1 2 3
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.