- This topic has 90 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 6 months ago by
sdduuuude.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 3, 2010 at 9:02 PM #17140March 3, 2010 at 10:52 PM #520438
Eugene
ParticipantThat looks way below cash flow neutral. I’ll guess 2000-2500/month in rent? Vs. fully amortized PITI of $1400, assuming 20% down.
March 3, 2010 at 10:52 PM #521015ParticipantThat looks way below cash flow neutral. I’ll guess 2000-2500/month in rent? Vs. fully amortized PITI of $1400, assuming 20% down.
March 3, 2010 at 10:52 PM #521107ParticipantThat looks way below cash flow neutral. I’ll guess 2000-2500/month in rent? Vs. fully amortized PITI of $1400, assuming 20% down.
March 3, 2010 at 10:52 PM #521363ParticipantThat looks way below cash flow neutral. I’ll guess 2000-2500/month in rent? Vs. fully amortized PITI of $1400, assuming 20% down.
March 3, 2010 at 10:52 PM #520579ParticipantThat looks way below cash flow neutral. I’ll guess 2000-2500/month in rent? Vs. fully amortized PITI of $1400, assuming 20% down.
March 4, 2010 at 12:01 AM #521040Raybyrnes
ParticipantI figure if it is selling that low you are going to have to put a chunk of change in to get it back up to rentable condition but yeah it should cash flow. And Clairmont is pretty central with respect to location.
March 4, 2010 at 12:01 AM #521132ParticipantI figure if it is selling that low you are going to have to put a chunk of change in to get it back up to rentable condition but yeah it should cash flow. And Clairmont is pretty central with respect to location.
March 4, 2010 at 12:01 AM #520463ParticipantI figure if it is selling that low you are going to have to put a chunk of change in to get it back up to rentable condition but yeah it should cash flow. And Clairmont is pretty central with respect to location.
March 4, 2010 at 12:01 AM #521387ParticipantI figure if it is selling that low you are going to have to put a chunk of change in to get it back up to rentable condition but yeah it should cash flow. And Clairmont is pretty central with respect to location.
March 4, 2010 at 12:01 AM #520604ParticipantI figure if it is selling that low you are going to have to put a chunk of change in to get it back up to rentable condition but yeah it should cash flow. And Clairmont is pretty central with respect to location.
March 4, 2010 at 5:39 AM #520624pemeliza
ParticipantAre you sure that was an arm’s length transaction? This one just closed on the same street and was much smaller (but probably in better condition.
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-090064360-5359_Channing_St_San_Diego_CA_92117
Wow, $2000-$2500 a month for that! I think that is way too high for that these days based on what I am seeing rent in my area.
March 4, 2010 at 5:39 AM #521407ParticipantAre you sure that was an arm’s length transaction? This one just closed on the same street and was much smaller (but probably in better condition.
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-090064360-5359_Channing_St_San_Diego_CA_92117
Wow, $2000-$2500 a month for that! I think that is way too high for that these days based on what I am seeing rent in my area.
March 4, 2010 at 5:39 AM #521060ParticipantAre you sure that was an arm’s length transaction? This one just closed on the same street and was much smaller (but probably in better condition.
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-090064360-5359_Channing_St_San_Diego_CA_92117
Wow, $2000-$2500 a month for that! I think that is way too high for that these days based on what I am seeing rent in my area.
March 4, 2010 at 5:39 AM #520483ParticipantAre you sure that was an arm’s length transaction? This one just closed on the same street and was much smaller (but probably in better condition.
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-090064360-5359_Channing_St_San_Diego_CA_92117
Wow, $2000-$2500 a month for that! I think that is way too high for that these days based on what I am seeing rent in my area.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.