- This topic has 55 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 10 months ago by 4plexowner.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 14, 2010 at 9:35 AM #17043February 14, 2010 at 10:28 AM #513003scaredyclassicParticipant
my dad never owned a place and he did ok.
February 14, 2010 at 10:28 AM #513573scaredyclassicParticipantmy dad never owned a place and he did ok.
February 14, 2010 at 10:28 AM #513665scaredyclassicParticipantmy dad never owned a place and he did ok.
February 14, 2010 at 10:28 AM #513919scaredyclassicParticipantmy dad never owned a place and he did ok.
February 14, 2010 at 10:28 AM #513151scaredyclassicParticipantmy dad never owned a place and he did ok.
February 14, 2010 at 12:32 PM #513710NotCrankyParticipantBubba, If you included gains from the owner occupied properties you previously owned in the overall situation, would renting still be cheaper than owning? If you had just stayed put in one of the originals, would you still say that owning costs more than renting?
February 14, 2010 at 12:32 PM #513048NotCrankyParticipantBubba, If you included gains from the owner occupied properties you previously owned in the overall situation, would renting still be cheaper than owning? If you had just stayed put in one of the originals, would you still say that owning costs more than renting?
February 14, 2010 at 12:32 PM #513965NotCrankyParticipantBubba, If you included gains from the owner occupied properties you previously owned in the overall situation, would renting still be cheaper than owning? If you had just stayed put in one of the originals, would you still say that owning costs more than renting?
February 14, 2010 at 12:32 PM #513196NotCrankyParticipantBubba, If you included gains from the owner occupied properties you previously owned in the overall situation, would renting still be cheaper than owning? If you had just stayed put in one of the originals, would you still say that owning costs more than renting?
February 14, 2010 at 12:32 PM #513618NotCrankyParticipantBubba, If you included gains from the owner occupied properties you previously owned in the overall situation, would renting still be cheaper than owning? If you had just stayed put in one of the originals, would you still say that owning costs more than renting?
February 14, 2010 at 3:11 PM #513221bubba99ParticipantGood question. I believe the owning costs would have been about lower than my purchases 10 years earlier. But I don’t see any bubble level appreciation in the next 5 to 10 years.
But you make a good point. The half million cash profit I took from the sale of properties probably weights the equation in favor of owning. There is no appreciation potential in renting.
February 14, 2010 at 3:11 PM #513073bubba99ParticipantGood question. I believe the owning costs would have been about lower than my purchases 10 years earlier. But I don’t see any bubble level appreciation in the next 5 to 10 years.
But you make a good point. The half million cash profit I took from the sale of properties probably weights the equation in favor of owning. There is no appreciation potential in renting.
February 14, 2010 at 3:11 PM #513735bubba99ParticipantGood question. I believe the owning costs would have been about lower than my purchases 10 years earlier. But I don’t see any bubble level appreciation in the next 5 to 10 years.
But you make a good point. The half million cash profit I took from the sale of properties probably weights the equation in favor of owning. There is no appreciation potential in renting.
February 14, 2010 at 3:11 PM #513643bubba99ParticipantGood question. I believe the owning costs would have been about lower than my purchases 10 years earlier. But I don’t see any bubble level appreciation in the next 5 to 10 years.
But you make a good point. The half million cash profit I took from the sale of properties probably weights the equation in favor of owning. There is no appreciation potential in renting.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.