Menu

Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › What happened to 12817 SEABREEZE FARMS DR, 92130?

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 31 total)
1 2 3
  • Author
    Posts
  • February 6, 2010 at 11:54 AM #17011
    HomeSD
    Participant

    Anybody knows what happened to 12817 SEABREEZE FARMS DR? It was auctioned and sold twice within 3 months at the court house steps

    11/09/09 opening bid $608,445, sold to 3rd party $608,446

    2/2/10 opening bid $614,893, sold to 3rd party $885,000

    Thank you!

    February 6, 2010 at 7:26 PM #510110
    UCGal
    Participant

    It doesn’t show as sold at trustee on 2/2/2010 on fidelityasap.com.

    I don’t see either sale listed – so it may not have been recorded. (I don’t have access to title searches.)

    February 6, 2010 at 7:26 PM #511014
    UCGal
    Participant

    It doesn’t show as sold at trustee on 2/2/2010 on fidelityasap.com.

    I don’t see either sale listed – so it may not have been recorded. (I don’t have access to title searches.)

    February 6, 2010 at 7:26 PM #510763
    UCGal
    Participant

    It doesn’t show as sold at trustee on 2/2/2010 on fidelityasap.com.

    I don’t see either sale listed – so it may not have been recorded. (I don’t have access to title searches.)

    February 6, 2010 at 7:26 PM #510668
    UCGal
    Participant

    It doesn’t show as sold at trustee on 2/2/2010 on fidelityasap.com.

    I don’t see either sale listed – so it may not have been recorded. (I don’t have access to title searches.)

    February 6, 2010 at 7:26 PM #510258
    UCGal
    Participant

    It doesn’t show as sold at trustee on 2/2/2010 on fidelityasap.com.

    I don’t see either sale listed – so it may not have been recorded. (I don’t have access to title searches.)

    February 6, 2010 at 8:01 PM #510263
    Eugene
    Participant

    Recorder grantor/grantee index does not show any transfers associated with either of the alleged sales. It seems that original owners are still in control.

    February 6, 2010 at 8:01 PM #511019
    Eugene
    Participant

    Recorder grantor/grantee index does not show any transfers associated with either of the alleged sales. It seems that original owners are still in control.

    February 6, 2010 at 8:01 PM #510673
    Eugene
    Participant

    Recorder grantor/grantee index does not show any transfers associated with either of the alleged sales. It seems that original owners are still in control.

    February 6, 2010 at 8:01 PM #510115
    Eugene
    Participant

    Recorder grantor/grantee index does not show any transfers associated with either of the alleged sales. It seems that original owners are still in control.

    February 6, 2010 at 8:01 PM #510768
    Eugene
    Participant

    Recorder grantor/grantee index does not show any transfers associated with either of the alleged sales. It seems that original owners are still in control.

    February 6, 2010 at 8:33 PM #510273
    UCGal
    Participant

    [quote=Eugene]Recorder grantor/grantee index does not show any transfers associated with either of the alleged sales. It seems that original owners are still in control.[/quote]

    I agree. But the owners do have 2 NOTs against them – one from 1/13/2010, and one from 10/19/2009.

    February 6, 2010 at 8:33 PM #511029
    UCGal
    Participant

    [quote=Eugene]Recorder grantor/grantee index does not show any transfers associated with either of the alleged sales. It seems that original owners are still in control.[/quote]

    I agree. But the owners do have 2 NOTs against them – one from 1/13/2010, and one from 10/19/2009.

    February 6, 2010 at 8:33 PM #510683
    UCGal
    Participant

    [quote=Eugene]Recorder grantor/grantee index does not show any transfers associated with either of the alleged sales. It seems that original owners are still in control.[/quote]

    I agree. But the owners do have 2 NOTs against them – one from 1/13/2010, and one from 10/19/2009.

    February 6, 2010 at 8:33 PM #510125
    UCGal
    Participant

    [quote=Eugene]Recorder grantor/grantee index does not show any transfers associated with either of the alleged sales. It seems that original owners are still in control.[/quote]

    I agree. But the owners do have 2 NOTs against them – one from 1/13/2010, and one from 10/19/2009.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 31 total)
1 2 3
  • The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.