Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Ken Lewis charged with fraud.
- This topic has 60 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 10 months ago by CafeMoto.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 4, 2010 at 8:50 AM #17001February 4, 2010 at 9:52 AM #508862patientrenterParticipant
It’s nice to see some good news. Ken Lewis in an orange jump-suit would be even better.
February 4, 2010 at 9:52 AM #509010patientrenterParticipantIt’s nice to see some good news. Ken Lewis in an orange jump-suit would be even better.
February 4, 2010 at 9:52 AM #509767patientrenterParticipantIt’s nice to see some good news. Ken Lewis in an orange jump-suit would be even better.
February 4, 2010 at 9:52 AM #509514patientrenterParticipantIt’s nice to see some good news. Ken Lewis in an orange jump-suit would be even better.
February 4, 2010 at 9:52 AM #509421patientrenterParticipantIt’s nice to see some good news. Ken Lewis in an orange jump-suit would be even better.
February 4, 2010 at 12:12 PM #508912AKParticipantI have mixed feelings about this … On the one hand he was stepping forward to shore up confidence in the crumbling financial system at a crucial point, rather than milking it for all it was worth a la Goldman Sachs. OTOH he was stepping forward with someone else’s money (i.e. BofA shareholders) and seems clear that they were misled.
February 4, 2010 at 12:12 PM #509059AKParticipantI have mixed feelings about this … On the one hand he was stepping forward to shore up confidence in the crumbling financial system at a crucial point, rather than milking it for all it was worth a la Goldman Sachs. OTOH he was stepping forward with someone else’s money (i.e. BofA shareholders) and seems clear that they were misled.
February 4, 2010 at 12:12 PM #509564AKParticipantI have mixed feelings about this … On the one hand he was stepping forward to shore up confidence in the crumbling financial system at a crucial point, rather than milking it for all it was worth a la Goldman Sachs. OTOH he was stepping forward with someone else’s money (i.e. BofA shareholders) and seems clear that they were misled.
February 4, 2010 at 12:12 PM #509817AKParticipantI have mixed feelings about this … On the one hand he was stepping forward to shore up confidence in the crumbling financial system at a crucial point, rather than milking it for all it was worth a la Goldman Sachs. OTOH he was stepping forward with someone else’s money (i.e. BofA shareholders) and seems clear that they were misled.
February 4, 2010 at 12:12 PM #509471AKParticipantI have mixed feelings about this … On the one hand he was stepping forward to shore up confidence in the crumbling financial system at a crucial point, rather than milking it for all it was worth a la Goldman Sachs. OTOH he was stepping forward with someone else’s money (i.e. BofA shareholders) and seems clear that they were misled.
February 4, 2010 at 1:28 PM #509669jParticipantAbout time, now let’s see others like Angelo Mozilo, Daniel Mudd, and Richard Syron.
February 4, 2010 at 1:28 PM #509575jParticipantAbout time, now let’s see others like Angelo Mozilo, Daniel Mudd, and Richard Syron.
February 4, 2010 at 1:28 PM #509922jParticipantAbout time, now let’s see others like Angelo Mozilo, Daniel Mudd, and Richard Syron.
February 4, 2010 at 1:28 PM #509164jParticipantAbout time, now let’s see others like Angelo Mozilo, Daniel Mudd, and Richard Syron.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.