Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Man-cession
- This topic has 235 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 1 month ago by
temeculaguy.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 7, 2009 at 4:01 PM #16460October 7, 2009 at 4:38 PM #465353
CBad
ParticipantWell, no one likes to admit that managers would probably pick a single guy to lay off vs. one who has a wife and kids. Also, aren’t married people the minority anyway these days?
As a side note, this paragraph from the article disturbs me and seems in line with Obama’s new education agenda:
“Another possible but more expensive step would be greater provision of childcare. Increasing the length of the school day, lowering the starting age and reducing school vacations might all help.”
October 7, 2009 at 4:38 PM #465541ParticipantWell, no one likes to admit that managers would probably pick a single guy to lay off vs. one who has a wife and kids. Also, aren’t married people the minority anyway these days?
As a side note, this paragraph from the article disturbs me and seems in line with Obama’s new education agenda:
“Another possible but more expensive step would be greater provision of childcare. Increasing the length of the school day, lowering the starting age and reducing school vacations might all help.”
October 7, 2009 at 4:38 PM #465895ParticipantWell, no one likes to admit that managers would probably pick a single guy to lay off vs. one who has a wife and kids. Also, aren’t married people the minority anyway these days?
As a side note, this paragraph from the article disturbs me and seems in line with Obama’s new education agenda:
“Another possible but more expensive step would be greater provision of childcare. Increasing the length of the school day, lowering the starting age and reducing school vacations might all help.”
October 7, 2009 at 4:38 PM #465968ParticipantWell, no one likes to admit that managers would probably pick a single guy to lay off vs. one who has a wife and kids. Also, aren’t married people the minority anyway these days?
As a side note, this paragraph from the article disturbs me and seems in line with Obama’s new education agenda:
“Another possible but more expensive step would be greater provision of childcare. Increasing the length of the school day, lowering the starting age and reducing school vacations might all help.”
October 7, 2009 at 4:38 PM #466179ParticipantWell, no one likes to admit that managers would probably pick a single guy to lay off vs. one who has a wife and kids. Also, aren’t married people the minority anyway these days?
As a side note, this paragraph from the article disturbs me and seems in line with Obama’s new education agenda:
“Another possible but more expensive step would be greater provision of childcare. Increasing the length of the school day, lowering the starting age and reducing school vacations might all help.”
October 8, 2009 at 7:17 AM #465537Hobie
Participant“The problems of many women in the workforce are far more ingrained and harder to deal with.”
…..from the last line of the article. .. Just makes ya smile…..
October 8, 2009 at 7:17 AM #465726Participant“The problems of many women in the workforce are far more ingrained and harder to deal with.”
…..from the last line of the article. .. Just makes ya smile…..
October 8, 2009 at 7:17 AM #466080Participant“The problems of many women in the workforce are far more ingrained and harder to deal with.”
…..from the last line of the article. .. Just makes ya smile…..
October 8, 2009 at 7:17 AM #466153Participant“The problems of many women in the workforce are far more ingrained and harder to deal with.”
…..from the last line of the article. .. Just makes ya smile…..
October 8, 2009 at 7:17 AM #466365Participant“The problems of many women in the workforce are far more ingrained and harder to deal with.”
…..from the last line of the article. .. Just makes ya smile…..
October 8, 2009 at 7:43 AM #465547scaredyclassic
Participantuh, more chidcare is ‘troublesome”?
got kids? ever struggled to try to find a freaking place to put em?
Ive raised a bunch of them, had good income, and there were patches of sheer crazed desperation trying to patch together a plan for making sure they were all cared for w/ no SAHM.
anybody who criticizes greate raccess to day care is IMHO not in touch with the reality of life in this no-family-support, overworked, crazy society.
even now when they’re big, schools let out at what, 2:30? what si the freaking plan/ where are all these kids to go? statsitically there’s gonna be problems.
it’s a constant source of worry and anxiety.
youc an say, then, well don’t have kids.
good point.
but kids are here. and SAHM situation not viable at all times for all families
so what’s the plan????
more better day care….
October 8, 2009 at 7:43 AM #465736Participantuh, more chidcare is ‘troublesome”?
got kids? ever struggled to try to find a freaking place to put em?
Ive raised a bunch of them, had good income, and there were patches of sheer crazed desperation trying to patch together a plan for making sure they were all cared for w/ no SAHM.
anybody who criticizes greate raccess to day care is IMHO not in touch with the reality of life in this no-family-support, overworked, crazy society.
even now when they’re big, schools let out at what, 2:30? what si the freaking plan/ where are all these kids to go? statsitically there’s gonna be problems.
it’s a constant source of worry and anxiety.
youc an say, then, well don’t have kids.
good point.
but kids are here. and SAHM situation not viable at all times for all families
so what’s the plan????
more better day care….
October 8, 2009 at 7:43 AM #466090Participantuh, more chidcare is ‘troublesome”?
got kids? ever struggled to try to find a freaking place to put em?
Ive raised a bunch of them, had good income, and there were patches of sheer crazed desperation trying to patch together a plan for making sure they were all cared for w/ no SAHM.
anybody who criticizes greate raccess to day care is IMHO not in touch with the reality of life in this no-family-support, overworked, crazy society.
even now when they’re big, schools let out at what, 2:30? what si the freaking plan/ where are all these kids to go? statsitically there’s gonna be problems.
it’s a constant source of worry and anxiety.
youc an say, then, well don’t have kids.
good point.
but kids are here. and SAHM situation not viable at all times for all families
so what’s the plan????
more better day care….
October 8, 2009 at 7:43 AM #466163Participantuh, more chidcare is ‘troublesome”?
got kids? ever struggled to try to find a freaking place to put em?
Ive raised a bunch of them, had good income, and there were patches of sheer crazed desperation trying to patch together a plan for making sure they were all cared for w/ no SAHM.
anybody who criticizes greate raccess to day care is IMHO not in touch with the reality of life in this no-family-support, overworked, crazy society.
even now when they’re big, schools let out at what, 2:30? what si the freaking plan/ where are all these kids to go? statsitically there’s gonna be problems.
it’s a constant source of worry and anxiety.
youc an say, then, well don’t have kids.
good point.
but kids are here. and SAHM situation not viable at all times for all families
so what’s the plan????
more better day care….
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.