Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Disgusted with the California Budget: 1999 vs 2009 Per Capita Spending
- This topic has 45 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 8 months ago by DWCAP.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 25, 2009 at 11:38 AM #16242August 25, 2009 at 11:43 PM #449022CA renterParticipant
We’ve discussed these issues in some of our Prop 13 debates, and it seems most of us — no matter which political side we are on — agree that California’s biggest problem is **spending** and not income. Definitely agree with this.
August 25, 2009 at 11:43 PM #449213CA renterParticipantWe’ve discussed these issues in some of our Prop 13 debates, and it seems most of us — no matter which political side we are on — agree that California’s biggest problem is **spending** and not income. Definitely agree with this.
August 25, 2009 at 11:43 PM #449553CA renterParticipantWe’ve discussed these issues in some of our Prop 13 debates, and it seems most of us — no matter which political side we are on — agree that California’s biggest problem is **spending** and not income. Definitely agree with this.
August 25, 2009 at 11:43 PM #449625CA renterParticipantWe’ve discussed these issues in some of our Prop 13 debates, and it seems most of us — no matter which political side we are on — agree that California’s biggest problem is **spending** and not income. Definitely agree with this.
August 25, 2009 at 11:43 PM #449811CA renterParticipantWe’ve discussed these issues in some of our Prop 13 debates, and it seems most of us — no matter which political side we are on — agree that California’s biggest problem is **spending** and not income. Definitely agree with this.
August 26, 2009 at 12:22 AM #449032EugeneParticipant[quote=CA renter]We’ve discussed these issues in some of our Prop 13 debates, and it seems most of us — no matter which political side we are on — agree that California’s biggest problem is **spending** and not income. [/quote]
Even though a few of us brought numbers to demonstrate that California spending per capita is on par with Texas (whose Medicaid is so underfunded that Texas boasts the highest percentage of people without health insurance in the nation, 25%) and below Oregon. But we’re the blue state, therefore we must be spending money out the wazoo. Who needs numbers.
August 26, 2009 at 12:22 AM #449223EugeneParticipant[quote=CA renter]We’ve discussed these issues in some of our Prop 13 debates, and it seems most of us — no matter which political side we are on — agree that California’s biggest problem is **spending** and not income. [/quote]
Even though a few of us brought numbers to demonstrate that California spending per capita is on par with Texas (whose Medicaid is so underfunded that Texas boasts the highest percentage of people without health insurance in the nation, 25%) and below Oregon. But we’re the blue state, therefore we must be spending money out the wazoo. Who needs numbers.
August 26, 2009 at 12:22 AM #449563EugeneParticipant[quote=CA renter]We’ve discussed these issues in some of our Prop 13 debates, and it seems most of us — no matter which political side we are on — agree that California’s biggest problem is **spending** and not income. [/quote]
Even though a few of us brought numbers to demonstrate that California spending per capita is on par with Texas (whose Medicaid is so underfunded that Texas boasts the highest percentage of people without health insurance in the nation, 25%) and below Oregon. But we’re the blue state, therefore we must be spending money out the wazoo. Who needs numbers.
August 26, 2009 at 12:22 AM #449635EugeneParticipant[quote=CA renter]We’ve discussed these issues in some of our Prop 13 debates, and it seems most of us — no matter which political side we are on — agree that California’s biggest problem is **spending** and not income. [/quote]
Even though a few of us brought numbers to demonstrate that California spending per capita is on par with Texas (whose Medicaid is so underfunded that Texas boasts the highest percentage of people without health insurance in the nation, 25%) and below Oregon. But we’re the blue state, therefore we must be spending money out the wazoo. Who needs numbers.
August 26, 2009 at 12:22 AM #449820EugeneParticipant[quote=CA renter]We’ve discussed these issues in some of our Prop 13 debates, and it seems most of us — no matter which political side we are on — agree that California’s biggest problem is **spending** and not income. [/quote]
Even though a few of us brought numbers to demonstrate that California spending per capita is on par with Texas (whose Medicaid is so underfunded that Texas boasts the highest percentage of people without health insurance in the nation, 25%) and below Oregon. But we’re the blue state, therefore we must be spending money out the wazoo. Who needs numbers.
August 26, 2009 at 4:52 AM #449037EconProfParticipantEugene: You are so wrong.
Google State Spending Per Capita.
You will find CA spent $6417 per capita in 2007, while Texas spent $3831.August 26, 2009 at 4:52 AM #449228EconProfParticipantEugene: You are so wrong.
Google State Spending Per Capita.
You will find CA spent $6417 per capita in 2007, while Texas spent $3831.August 26, 2009 at 4:52 AM #449568EconProfParticipantEugene: You are so wrong.
Google State Spending Per Capita.
You will find CA spent $6417 per capita in 2007, while Texas spent $3831.August 26, 2009 at 4:52 AM #449640EconProfParticipantEugene: You are so wrong.
Google State Spending Per Capita.
You will find CA spent $6417 per capita in 2007, while Texas spent $3831. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.