Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Zillow gone wild?
- This topic has 90 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 3 months ago by CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 20, 2009 at 6:34 PM #16216August 20, 2009 at 6:47 PM #447233patientrenterParticipant
I’ve noticed that Zillow fairly consistently overestimates prices, starting some time ago (that I’ve forgotten), within the last 2 years.
I suspect they got a message that their business model wasn’t going to work unless they cooperated.
August 20, 2009 at 6:47 PM #448016patientrenterParticipantI’ve noticed that Zillow fairly consistently overestimates prices, starting some time ago (that I’ve forgotten), within the last 2 years.
I suspect they got a message that their business model wasn’t going to work unless they cooperated.
August 20, 2009 at 6:47 PM #447832patientrenterParticipantI’ve noticed that Zillow fairly consistently overestimates prices, starting some time ago (that I’ve forgotten), within the last 2 years.
I suspect they got a message that their business model wasn’t going to work unless they cooperated.
August 20, 2009 at 6:47 PM #447763patientrenterParticipantI’ve noticed that Zillow fairly consistently overestimates prices, starting some time ago (that I’ve forgotten), within the last 2 years.
I suspect they got a message that their business model wasn’t going to work unless they cooperated.
August 20, 2009 at 6:47 PM #447425patientrenterParticipantI’ve noticed that Zillow fairly consistently overestimates prices, starting some time ago (that I’ve forgotten), within the last 2 years.
I suspect they got a message that their business model wasn’t going to work unless they cooperated.
August 20, 2009 at 7:08 PM #447450AKParticipantI’ve seen Zestimates up 15% in the past 2-3 months for Oceanside SFRs. Not sure where they’re getting those numbers but it can’t be from comps …
August 20, 2009 at 7:08 PM #447858AKParticipantI’ve seen Zestimates up 15% in the past 2-3 months for Oceanside SFRs. Not sure where they’re getting those numbers but it can’t be from comps …
August 20, 2009 at 7:08 PM #447788AKParticipantI’ve seen Zestimates up 15% in the past 2-3 months for Oceanside SFRs. Not sure where they’re getting those numbers but it can’t be from comps …
August 20, 2009 at 7:08 PM #447258AKParticipantI’ve seen Zestimates up 15% in the past 2-3 months for Oceanside SFRs. Not sure where they’re getting those numbers but it can’t be from comps …
August 20, 2009 at 7:08 PM #448042AKParticipantI’ve seen Zestimates up 15% in the past 2-3 months for Oceanside SFRs. Not sure where they’re getting those numbers but it can’t be from comps …
August 20, 2009 at 10:16 PM #447843bsrsharmaParticipantPreviously, Zillow was merely overestimating the value; now, it is completely irrational. The best use you can get from Zillow is to expand the graph to 10 year mode and pick a historical value 8-10 years back. Basically consider this decade as the (first) lost decade.
August 20, 2009 at 10:16 PM #447313bsrsharmaParticipantPreviously, Zillow was merely overestimating the value; now, it is completely irrational. The best use you can get from Zillow is to expand the graph to 10 year mode and pick a historical value 8-10 years back. Basically consider this decade as the (first) lost decade.
August 20, 2009 at 10:16 PM #447914bsrsharmaParticipantPreviously, Zillow was merely overestimating the value; now, it is completely irrational. The best use you can get from Zillow is to expand the graph to 10 year mode and pick a historical value 8-10 years back. Basically consider this decade as the (first) lost decade.
August 20, 2009 at 10:16 PM #448097bsrsharmaParticipantPreviously, Zillow was merely overestimating the value; now, it is completely irrational. The best use you can get from Zillow is to expand the graph to 10 year mode and pick a historical value 8-10 years back. Basically consider this decade as the (first) lost decade.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.