Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › This should kick the dollar up a bit next week
- This topic has 55 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by
bsrsharma.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 5, 2009 at 12:12 PM #15990July 5, 2009 at 1:14 PM #425486
Chris Scoreboard Johnston
ParticipantIt will be fun to listen to the gold hucksters trying to discredit this story this week. I think we are getting close to the biggest con since real estate getting exposed.
Buy coins for a 30% premium over spot because gold is going to $3000. It would be hysterical if it were not going to be some damaging to so many people who have bought into this.
Somehow a 40 or 50% loss in Gold does not count where a 30% loss in stocks does. I still cannot figure out why they both are not losses?
July 5, 2009 at 1:14 PM #425714Chris Scoreboard Johnston
ParticipantIt will be fun to listen to the gold hucksters trying to discredit this story this week. I think we are getting close to the biggest con since real estate getting exposed.
Buy coins for a 30% premium over spot because gold is going to $3000. It would be hysterical if it were not going to be some damaging to so many people who have bought into this.
Somehow a 40 or 50% loss in Gold does not count where a 30% loss in stocks does. I still cannot figure out why they both are not losses?
July 5, 2009 at 1:14 PM #426001Chris Scoreboard Johnston
ParticipantIt will be fun to listen to the gold hucksters trying to discredit this story this week. I think we are getting close to the biggest con since real estate getting exposed.
Buy coins for a 30% premium over spot because gold is going to $3000. It would be hysterical if it were not going to be some damaging to so many people who have bought into this.
Somehow a 40 or 50% loss in Gold does not count where a 30% loss in stocks does. I still cannot figure out why they both are not losses?
July 5, 2009 at 1:14 PM #426070Chris Scoreboard Johnston
ParticipantIt will be fun to listen to the gold hucksters trying to discredit this story this week. I think we are getting close to the biggest con since real estate getting exposed.
Buy coins for a 30% premium over spot because gold is going to $3000. It would be hysterical if it were not going to be some damaging to so many people who have bought into this.
Somehow a 40 or 50% loss in Gold does not count where a 30% loss in stocks does. I still cannot figure out why they both are not losses?
July 5, 2009 at 1:14 PM #426233Chris Scoreboard Johnston
ParticipantIt will be fun to listen to the gold hucksters trying to discredit this story this week. I think we are getting close to the biggest con since real estate getting exposed.
Buy coins for a 30% premium over spot because gold is going to $3000. It would be hysterical if it were not going to be some damaging to so many people who have bought into this.
Somehow a 40 or 50% loss in Gold does not count where a 30% loss in stocks does. I still cannot figure out why they both are not losses?
July 5, 2009 at 1:30 PM #425491paramount
ParticipantThe ‘buy gold’ lobby is little more than a conglomerate of hustlers. Of course the same can be said of Realtors, mortgage brokers, many Wall Street firms, insurance companies/agents and so forth…
The Chinese might be saying this though because they hold so many $$ themselves.
July 5, 2009 at 1:30 PM #425720paramount
ParticipantThe ‘buy gold’ lobby is little more than a conglomerate of hustlers. Of course the same can be said of Realtors, mortgage brokers, many Wall Street firms, insurance companies/agents and so forth…
The Chinese might be saying this though because they hold so many $$ themselves.
July 5, 2009 at 1:30 PM #426006paramount
ParticipantThe ‘buy gold’ lobby is little more than a conglomerate of hustlers. Of course the same can be said of Realtors, mortgage brokers, many Wall Street firms, insurance companies/agents and so forth…
The Chinese might be saying this though because they hold so many $$ themselves.
July 5, 2009 at 1:30 PM #426075paramount
ParticipantThe ‘buy gold’ lobby is little more than a conglomerate of hustlers. Of course the same can be said of Realtors, mortgage brokers, many Wall Street firms, insurance companies/agents and so forth…
The Chinese might be saying this though because they hold so many $$ themselves.
July 5, 2009 at 1:30 PM #426238paramount
ParticipantThe ‘buy gold’ lobby is little more than a conglomerate of hustlers. Of course the same can be said of Realtors, mortgage brokers, many Wall Street firms, insurance companies/agents and so forth…
The Chinese might be saying this though because they hold so many $$ themselves.
July 5, 2009 at 1:42 PM #425496Arraya
ParticipantChina has been schizophrenic on this all year. Their desire for the dollar changes with the wind per their press releases.
China knows we are fucked and the economy is dropping like a rock WHICH affects our ability to pay back our debts. Of course this is happening simultaneously with skyrocketing deficits and plummeting tax revenue. Hockey sticks in either direction.
If you really want to listen to china I bet you could find A LOT more articles saying they are going to ditch it rather than not.
Take your pick but I suggest you look at the big picture first.
Also, I’ll take gold hustlers over the criminal digital dollar shysters any day, which keep all their holdings on hard drives in virtual realty.
Oh yeah, China seems to keep increasing their gold holdings as well as stockpiling commodities. I’m sure that does not mean anything.
July 5, 2009 at 1:42 PM #425725Arraya
ParticipantChina has been schizophrenic on this all year. Their desire for the dollar changes with the wind per their press releases.
China knows we are fucked and the economy is dropping like a rock WHICH affects our ability to pay back our debts. Of course this is happening simultaneously with skyrocketing deficits and plummeting tax revenue. Hockey sticks in either direction.
If you really want to listen to china I bet you could find A LOT more articles saying they are going to ditch it rather than not.
Take your pick but I suggest you look at the big picture first.
Also, I’ll take gold hustlers over the criminal digital dollar shysters any day, which keep all their holdings on hard drives in virtual realty.
Oh yeah, China seems to keep increasing their gold holdings as well as stockpiling commodities. I’m sure that does not mean anything.
July 5, 2009 at 1:42 PM #426011Arraya
ParticipantChina has been schizophrenic on this all year. Their desire for the dollar changes with the wind per their press releases.
China knows we are fucked and the economy is dropping like a rock WHICH affects our ability to pay back our debts. Of course this is happening simultaneously with skyrocketing deficits and plummeting tax revenue. Hockey sticks in either direction.
If you really want to listen to china I bet you could find A LOT more articles saying they are going to ditch it rather than not.
Take your pick but I suggest you look at the big picture first.
Also, I’ll take gold hustlers over the criminal digital dollar shysters any day, which keep all their holdings on hard drives in virtual realty.
Oh yeah, China seems to keep increasing their gold holdings as well as stockpiling commodities. I’m sure that does not mean anything.
July 5, 2009 at 1:42 PM #426080Arraya
ParticipantChina has been schizophrenic on this all year. Their desire for the dollar changes with the wind per their press releases.
China knows we are fucked and the economy is dropping like a rock WHICH affects our ability to pay back our debts. Of course this is happening simultaneously with skyrocketing deficits and plummeting tax revenue. Hockey sticks in either direction.
If you really want to listen to china I bet you could find A LOT more articles saying they are going to ditch it rather than not.
Take your pick but I suggest you look at the big picture first.
Also, I’ll take gold hustlers over the criminal digital dollar shysters any day, which keep all their holdings on hard drives in virtual realty.
Oh yeah, China seems to keep increasing their gold holdings as well as stockpiling commodities. I’m sure that does not mean anything.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
