If I remove everything that LA times lists as an option excluding one time fixes and tax increases we’re still in deficit.
I’m guessing that some fairly large expenses have been conveniently excluded. One thing that comes to mind is the fairly recently voter approved stem cell research. Wasn’t that hugely costly? And aren’t there 10 more things crazy expenses where that came from?
It seems to me that by excluding options the LA Times is implicitly trying to sway public opinion towards more tax increases. What do you think?
