Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Calling All Piggington Lawyers
- This topic has 20 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by 4plexowner.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 8, 2009 at 10:29 AM #15846June 8, 2009 at 10:35 AM #4122074plexownerParticipant
the rule of law is long gone in this country
June 8, 2009 at 10:35 AM #4124424plexownerParticipantthe rule of law is long gone in this country
June 8, 2009 at 10:35 AM #4129064plexownerParticipantthe rule of law is long gone in this country
June 8, 2009 at 10:35 AM #4126894plexownerParticipantthe rule of law is long gone in this country
June 8, 2009 at 10:35 AM #4127564plexownerParticipantthe rule of law is long gone in this country
June 8, 2009 at 10:37 AM #4122124plexownerParticipantCheney backpedals on earlier claims
~
Cheney has now acknowledged that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 – think there will be any legal action taken related to starting an illegal war against a sovereign nation?
June 8, 2009 at 10:37 AM #4124474plexownerParticipantCheney backpedals on earlier claims
~
Cheney has now acknowledged that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 – think there will be any legal action taken related to starting an illegal war against a sovereign nation?
June 8, 2009 at 10:37 AM #4129114plexownerParticipantCheney backpedals on earlier claims
~
Cheney has now acknowledged that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 – think there will be any legal action taken related to starting an illegal war against a sovereign nation?
June 8, 2009 at 10:37 AM #4126944plexownerParticipantCheney backpedals on earlier claims
~
Cheney has now acknowledged that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 – think there will be any legal action taken related to starting an illegal war against a sovereign nation?
June 8, 2009 at 10:37 AM #4127614plexownerParticipantCheney backpedals on earlier claims
~
Cheney has now acknowledged that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 – think there will be any legal action taken related to starting an illegal war against a sovereign nation?
June 8, 2009 at 11:13 AM #412739patbParticipantit’s about executive discretion, that the funds once appropriated
are not the subject of litigation.essentially, if the Congress gives Obama 300 million for general white house
operations, it’s not a lawsuit if he decides to hire flower girls to walk in
front of him casting petals.June 8, 2009 at 11:13 AM #412955patbParticipantit’s about executive discretion, that the funds once appropriated
are not the subject of litigation.essentially, if the Congress gives Obama 300 million for general white house
operations, it’s not a lawsuit if he decides to hire flower girls to walk in
front of him casting petals.June 8, 2009 at 11:13 AM #412804patbParticipantit’s about executive discretion, that the funds once appropriated
are not the subject of litigation.essentially, if the Congress gives Obama 300 million for general white house
operations, it’s not a lawsuit if he decides to hire flower girls to walk in
front of him casting petals.June 8, 2009 at 11:13 AM #412491patbParticipantit’s about executive discretion, that the funds once appropriated
are not the subject of litigation.essentially, if the Congress gives Obama 300 million for general white house
operations, it’s not a lawsuit if he decides to hire flower girls to walk in
front of him casting petals. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.