Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Another day another set of folks bite the dust..
- This topic has 15 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 7 months ago by
patientrenter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 25, 2009 at 4:36 PM #15555April 25, 2009 at 4:42 PM #387239
CoronitaParticipantWhy are there so many people so that allow complete strangers to assume their credit in one shape or form? It’s not the first time I read about something like this.
It’s just ironic, that people take such proactive steps against identity theft, but then when it comes to “investments”, anything goes. It’s like folks buying the most advanced security system/doorlocks for their homes, and then letting a complete stranger borrow the keys thinking that he/she isn’t going to steal anything inside.
I don’t get it.
April 25, 2009 at 4:42 PM #387506
CoronitaParticipantWhy are there so many people so that allow complete strangers to assume their credit in one shape or form? It’s not the first time I read about something like this.
It’s just ironic, that people take such proactive steps against identity theft, but then when it comes to “investments”, anything goes. It’s like folks buying the most advanced security system/doorlocks for their homes, and then letting a complete stranger borrow the keys thinking that he/she isn’t going to steal anything inside.
I don’t get it.
April 25, 2009 at 4:42 PM #387711
CoronitaParticipantWhy are there so many people so that allow complete strangers to assume their credit in one shape or form? It’s not the first time I read about something like this.
It’s just ironic, that people take such proactive steps against identity theft, but then when it comes to “investments”, anything goes. It’s like folks buying the most advanced security system/doorlocks for their homes, and then letting a complete stranger borrow the keys thinking that he/she isn’t going to steal anything inside.
I don’t get it.
April 25, 2009 at 4:42 PM #387763
CoronitaParticipantWhy are there so many people so that allow complete strangers to assume their credit in one shape or form? It’s not the first time I read about something like this.
It’s just ironic, that people take such proactive steps against identity theft, but then when it comes to “investments”, anything goes. It’s like folks buying the most advanced security system/doorlocks for their homes, and then letting a complete stranger borrow the keys thinking that he/she isn’t going to steal anything inside.
I don’t get it.
April 25, 2009 at 4:42 PM #387903
CoronitaParticipantWhy are there so many people so that allow complete strangers to assume their credit in one shape or form? It’s not the first time I read about something like this.
It’s just ironic, that people take such proactive steps against identity theft, but then when it comes to “investments”, anything goes. It’s like folks buying the most advanced security system/doorlocks for their homes, and then letting a complete stranger borrow the keys thinking that he/she isn’t going to steal anything inside.
I don’t get it.
April 25, 2009 at 10:38 PM #387324PadreBrian
ParticipantThe big ol cheats deserved it.
April 25, 2009 at 10:38 PM #387594PadreBrian
ParticipantThe big ol cheats deserved it.
April 25, 2009 at 10:38 PM #387795PadreBrian
ParticipantThe big ol cheats deserved it.
April 25, 2009 at 10:38 PM #387848PadreBrian
ParticipantThe big ol cheats deserved it.
April 25, 2009 at 10:38 PM #387987PadreBrian
ParticipantThe big ol cheats deserved it.
April 26, 2009 at 2:27 PM #387583patientrenter
Participant[quote=flu]Why are there so many people so that allow complete strangers to assume their credit in one shape or form? It’s not the first time I read about something like this.
It’s just ironic, that people take such proactive steps against identity theft, but then when it comes to “investments”, anything goes. It’s like folks buying the most advanced security system/doorlocks for their homes, and then letting a complete stranger borrow the keys thinking that he/she isn’t going to steal anything inside.
I don’t get it.[/quote]
flu, you don’t “understand” it, because, in a rational world, it makes no sense. However, and I think you know this, we don’t live in an economically rational world. Everyone kinda knew that it was OK to borrow without checking to make sure that you could and would repay your loans, come hell or high water. Culturally, repayment of debts is pretty much optional in the US of 2009, and people could see this building back in 2006 and 2007 and 2008. So these folks were making a rational choice for the culture they live in. They were getting a good deal if prices went up – and that was the more likely outcome – and a not very bad deal if prices went down. The smartest people were the ones who used their credit to the max to buy houses as early as possible with little money down, and then sold at least a few with the greatest appreciation before the collapse. But even those who didn’t sell in time were making a rational economic decision, given the biases we’ve allowed in our housing markets through small dowmpayments etc.
April 26, 2009 at 2:27 PM #387852patientrenter
Participant[quote=flu]Why are there so many people so that allow complete strangers to assume their credit in one shape or form? It’s not the first time I read about something like this.
It’s just ironic, that people take such proactive steps against identity theft, but then when it comes to “investments”, anything goes. It’s like folks buying the most advanced security system/doorlocks for their homes, and then letting a complete stranger borrow the keys thinking that he/she isn’t going to steal anything inside.
I don’t get it.[/quote]
flu, you don’t “understand” it, because, in a rational world, it makes no sense. However, and I think you know this, we don’t live in an economically rational world. Everyone kinda knew that it was OK to borrow without checking to make sure that you could and would repay your loans, come hell or high water. Culturally, repayment of debts is pretty much optional in the US of 2009, and people could see this building back in 2006 and 2007 and 2008. So these folks were making a rational choice for the culture they live in. They were getting a good deal if prices went up – and that was the more likely outcome – and a not very bad deal if prices went down. The smartest people were the ones who used their credit to the max to buy houses as early as possible with little money down, and then sold at least a few with the greatest appreciation before the collapse. But even those who didn’t sell in time were making a rational economic decision, given the biases we’ve allowed in our housing markets through small dowmpayments etc.
April 26, 2009 at 2:27 PM #388052patientrenter
Participant[quote=flu]Why are there so many people so that allow complete strangers to assume their credit in one shape or form? It’s not the first time I read about something like this.
It’s just ironic, that people take such proactive steps against identity theft, but then when it comes to “investments”, anything goes. It’s like folks buying the most advanced security system/doorlocks for their homes, and then letting a complete stranger borrow the keys thinking that he/she isn’t going to steal anything inside.
I don’t get it.[/quote]
flu, you don’t “understand” it, because, in a rational world, it makes no sense. However, and I think you know this, we don’t live in an economically rational world. Everyone kinda knew that it was OK to borrow without checking to make sure that you could and would repay your loans, come hell or high water. Culturally, repayment of debts is pretty much optional in the US of 2009, and people could see this building back in 2006 and 2007 and 2008. So these folks were making a rational choice for the culture they live in. They were getting a good deal if prices went up – and that was the more likely outcome – and a not very bad deal if prices went down. The smartest people were the ones who used their credit to the max to buy houses as early as possible with little money down, and then sold at least a few with the greatest appreciation before the collapse. But even those who didn’t sell in time were making a rational economic decision, given the biases we’ve allowed in our housing markets through small dowmpayments etc.
April 26, 2009 at 2:27 PM #388106patientrenter
Participant[quote=flu]Why are there so many people so that allow complete strangers to assume their credit in one shape or form? It’s not the first time I read about something like this.
It’s just ironic, that people take such proactive steps against identity theft, but then when it comes to “investments”, anything goes. It’s like folks buying the most advanced security system/doorlocks for their homes, and then letting a complete stranger borrow the keys thinking that he/she isn’t going to steal anything inside.
I don’t get it.[/quote]
flu, you don’t “understand” it, because, in a rational world, it makes no sense. However, and I think you know this, we don’t live in an economically rational world. Everyone kinda knew that it was OK to borrow without checking to make sure that you could and would repay your loans, come hell or high water. Culturally, repayment of debts is pretty much optional in the US of 2009, and people could see this building back in 2006 and 2007 and 2008. So these folks were making a rational choice for the culture they live in. They were getting a good deal if prices went up – and that was the more likely outcome – and a not very bad deal if prices went down. The smartest people were the ones who used their credit to the max to buy houses as early as possible with little money down, and then sold at least a few with the greatest appreciation before the collapse. But even those who didn’t sell in time were making a rational economic decision, given the biases we’ve allowed in our housing markets through small dowmpayments etc.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.
