- This topic has 440 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by
Aecetia.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 17, 2009 at 4:07 AM #15311March 17, 2009 at 5:24 AM #367541
Anonymous
GuestThis is a joke right.
An oxy junkie and a retarded Jesus freak???!!!???
Yes, just what this country needs!!!! Prosperity here we come!!!!!!!
March 17, 2009 at 5:24 AM #367830GuestThis is a joke right.
An oxy junkie and a retarded Jesus freak???!!!???
Yes, just what this country needs!!!! Prosperity here we come!!!!!!!
March 17, 2009 at 5:24 AM #367997GuestThis is a joke right.
An oxy junkie and a retarded Jesus freak???!!!???
Yes, just what this country needs!!!! Prosperity here we come!!!!!!!
March 17, 2009 at 5:24 AM #368033GuestThis is a joke right.
An oxy junkie and a retarded Jesus freak???!!!???
Yes, just what this country needs!!!! Prosperity here we come!!!!!!!
March 17, 2009 at 5:24 AM #368150GuestThis is a joke right.
An oxy junkie and a retarded Jesus freak???!!!???
Yes, just what this country needs!!!! Prosperity here we come!!!!!!!
March 17, 2009 at 7:06 AM #367551scaredyclassic
Participantbesides the opiate problem, i wonder if people generally would be prejudiced against a fat candidate. when was the last fat president? hasn’t it been a long while? I’d be interested in some reserach of the body fat index of presidents going back to george wash. was the last really corpulent prez back in the 1800’s? i think nowadays people (rightly or wrongly) tend to associate fat with being out of control. also, in terms of dying i office, mccain was probably more likely statistically to make it to the end of his term without spending a good amount of time in a coronary care facility than rush. not sure about the stats on that though, but im sure it would be in the voters subconscious. the fat, the serious drugs, tend to show a guy who cannot control his imuplses, which is okay with me personally, i like party people, just think america would rather have a toned, controlled black guy than fat, wild white guy in 2012. this sint the 1800s and fat is our national touchstone for character.
March 17, 2009 at 7:06 AM #367838Participantbesides the opiate problem, i wonder if people generally would be prejudiced against a fat candidate. when was the last fat president? hasn’t it been a long while? I’d be interested in some reserach of the body fat index of presidents going back to george wash. was the last really corpulent prez back in the 1800’s? i think nowadays people (rightly or wrongly) tend to associate fat with being out of control. also, in terms of dying i office, mccain was probably more likely statistically to make it to the end of his term without spending a good amount of time in a coronary care facility than rush. not sure about the stats on that though, but im sure it would be in the voters subconscious. the fat, the serious drugs, tend to show a guy who cannot control his imuplses, which is okay with me personally, i like party people, just think america would rather have a toned, controlled black guy than fat, wild white guy in 2012. this sint the 1800s and fat is our national touchstone for character.
March 17, 2009 at 7:06 AM #368007Participantbesides the opiate problem, i wonder if people generally would be prejudiced against a fat candidate. when was the last fat president? hasn’t it been a long while? I’d be interested in some reserach of the body fat index of presidents going back to george wash. was the last really corpulent prez back in the 1800’s? i think nowadays people (rightly or wrongly) tend to associate fat with being out of control. also, in terms of dying i office, mccain was probably more likely statistically to make it to the end of his term without spending a good amount of time in a coronary care facility than rush. not sure about the stats on that though, but im sure it would be in the voters subconscious. the fat, the serious drugs, tend to show a guy who cannot control his imuplses, which is okay with me personally, i like party people, just think america would rather have a toned, controlled black guy than fat, wild white guy in 2012. this sint the 1800s and fat is our national touchstone for character.
March 17, 2009 at 7:06 AM #368043Participantbesides the opiate problem, i wonder if people generally would be prejudiced against a fat candidate. when was the last fat president? hasn’t it been a long while? I’d be interested in some reserach of the body fat index of presidents going back to george wash. was the last really corpulent prez back in the 1800’s? i think nowadays people (rightly or wrongly) tend to associate fat with being out of control. also, in terms of dying i office, mccain was probably more likely statistically to make it to the end of his term without spending a good amount of time in a coronary care facility than rush. not sure about the stats on that though, but im sure it would be in the voters subconscious. the fat, the serious drugs, tend to show a guy who cannot control his imuplses, which is okay with me personally, i like party people, just think america would rather have a toned, controlled black guy than fat, wild white guy in 2012. this sint the 1800s and fat is our national touchstone for character.
March 17, 2009 at 7:06 AM #368160Participantbesides the opiate problem, i wonder if people generally would be prejudiced against a fat candidate. when was the last fat president? hasn’t it been a long while? I’d be interested in some reserach of the body fat index of presidents going back to george wash. was the last really corpulent prez back in the 1800’s? i think nowadays people (rightly or wrongly) tend to associate fat with being out of control. also, in terms of dying i office, mccain was probably more likely statistically to make it to the end of his term without spending a good amount of time in a coronary care facility than rush. not sure about the stats on that though, but im sure it would be in the voters subconscious. the fat, the serious drugs, tend to show a guy who cannot control his imuplses, which is okay with me personally, i like party people, just think america would rather have a toned, controlled black guy than fat, wild white guy in 2012. this sint the 1800s and fat is our national touchstone for character.
March 17, 2009 at 7:07 AM #367556Butleroftwo
ParticipantConsidering the morons that are attempting to run the country now, I would think that anyone with a pulse could do better.
March 17, 2009 at 7:07 AM #367843ParticipantConsidering the morons that are attempting to run the country now, I would think that anyone with a pulse could do better.
March 17, 2009 at 7:07 AM #368013ParticipantConsidering the morons that are attempting to run the country now, I would think that anyone with a pulse could do better.
March 17, 2009 at 7:07 AM #368048ParticipantConsidering the morons that are attempting to run the country now, I would think that anyone with a pulse could do better.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.