- This topic has 345 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by LuckyInOC.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 16, 2009 at 11:53 PM #15310March 17, 2009 at 8:26 AM #367618(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant
The stocks of the four companies cited as being the principal cause, C, BAC, WFC, and JPM, are UP 60%, 53%, 37% and 49%, respectively since this article was written.
As a result, the TARP is now down only 27%, according to the same source* for the article.
Seems to me like the TARP is doing better than many pension funds, 201k’s, IRA’s, etc.
For the record, I am not the one who made the claim that TARP would be money good. Just thought it would be of interest to post the results of my 5 minutes of research on the contents of the article.March 17, 2009 at 8:26 AM #367907(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantThe stocks of the four companies cited as being the principal cause, C, BAC, WFC, and JPM, are UP 60%, 53%, 37% and 49%, respectively since this article was written.
As a result, the TARP is now down only 27%, according to the same source* for the article.
Seems to me like the TARP is doing better than many pension funds, 201k’s, IRA’s, etc.
For the record, I am not the one who made the claim that TARP would be money good. Just thought it would be of interest to post the results of my 5 minutes of research on the contents of the article.March 17, 2009 at 8:26 AM #368076(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantThe stocks of the four companies cited as being the principal cause, C, BAC, WFC, and JPM, are UP 60%, 53%, 37% and 49%, respectively since this article was written.
As a result, the TARP is now down only 27%, according to the same source* for the article.
Seems to me like the TARP is doing better than many pension funds, 201k’s, IRA’s, etc.
For the record, I am not the one who made the claim that TARP would be money good. Just thought it would be of interest to post the results of my 5 minutes of research on the contents of the article.March 17, 2009 at 8:26 AM #368112(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantThe stocks of the four companies cited as being the principal cause, C, BAC, WFC, and JPM, are UP 60%, 53%, 37% and 49%, respectively since this article was written.
As a result, the TARP is now down only 27%, according to the same source* for the article.
Seems to me like the TARP is doing better than many pension funds, 201k’s, IRA’s, etc.
For the record, I am not the one who made the claim that TARP would be money good. Just thought it would be of interest to post the results of my 5 minutes of research on the contents of the article.March 17, 2009 at 8:26 AM #368227(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantThe stocks of the four companies cited as being the principal cause, C, BAC, WFC, and JPM, are UP 60%, 53%, 37% and 49%, respectively since this article was written.
As a result, the TARP is now down only 27%, according to the same source* for the article.
Seems to me like the TARP is doing better than many pension funds, 201k’s, IRA’s, etc.
For the record, I am not the one who made the claim that TARP would be money good. Just thought it would be of interest to post the results of my 5 minutes of research on the contents of the article.March 17, 2009 at 10:11 AM #367687daveljParticipantWe’re in the third inning of a nine inning game. I realize that Americans are impatient – that’s part of what’s gotten us into this mess – but can we at least play the whole game before we declare the winner and loser? Just a thought.
March 17, 2009 at 10:11 AM #367977daveljParticipantWe’re in the third inning of a nine inning game. I realize that Americans are impatient – that’s part of what’s gotten us into this mess – but can we at least play the whole game before we declare the winner and loser? Just a thought.
March 17, 2009 at 10:11 AM #368147daveljParticipantWe’re in the third inning of a nine inning game. I realize that Americans are impatient – that’s part of what’s gotten us into this mess – but can we at least play the whole game before we declare the winner and loser? Just a thought.
March 17, 2009 at 10:11 AM #368183daveljParticipantWe’re in the third inning of a nine inning game. I realize that Americans are impatient – that’s part of what’s gotten us into this mess – but can we at least play the whole game before we declare the winner and loser? Just a thought.
March 17, 2009 at 10:11 AM #368298daveljParticipantWe’re in the third inning of a nine inning game. I realize that Americans are impatient – that’s part of what’s gotten us into this mess – but can we at least play the whole game before we declare the winner and loser? Just a thought.
March 17, 2009 at 10:12 AM #367682CoronitaParticipantLOL…AIG….
(quote)
Sen. Charles Grassley suggested in an Iowa City radio interview on Monday that AIG executives should take a Japanese approach toward accepting responsibility by resigning or killing themselves.
“Obviously, maybe they ought to be removed,” the Iowa Republican said. “But I would suggest the first thing that would make me feel a little bit better toward them if they’d follow the Japanese example and come before the American people and take that deep bow and say, I’m sorry, and then either do one of two things: resign or go commit suicide.”
(end quote)
March 17, 2009 at 10:12 AM #367972CoronitaParticipantLOL…AIG….
(quote)
Sen. Charles Grassley suggested in an Iowa City radio interview on Monday that AIG executives should take a Japanese approach toward accepting responsibility by resigning or killing themselves.
“Obviously, maybe they ought to be removed,” the Iowa Republican said. “But I would suggest the first thing that would make me feel a little bit better toward them if they’d follow the Japanese example and come before the American people and take that deep bow and say, I’m sorry, and then either do one of two things: resign or go commit suicide.”
(end quote)
March 17, 2009 at 10:12 AM #368142CoronitaParticipantLOL…AIG….
(quote)
Sen. Charles Grassley suggested in an Iowa City radio interview on Monday that AIG executives should take a Japanese approach toward accepting responsibility by resigning or killing themselves.
“Obviously, maybe they ought to be removed,” the Iowa Republican said. “But I would suggest the first thing that would make me feel a little bit better toward them if they’d follow the Japanese example and come before the American people and take that deep bow and say, I’m sorry, and then either do one of two things: resign or go commit suicide.”
(end quote)
March 17, 2009 at 10:12 AM #368178CoronitaParticipantLOL…AIG….
(quote)
Sen. Charles Grassley suggested in an Iowa City radio interview on Monday that AIG executives should take a Japanese approach toward accepting responsibility by resigning or killing themselves.
“Obviously, maybe they ought to be removed,” the Iowa Republican said. “But I would suggest the first thing that would make me feel a little bit better toward them if they’d follow the Japanese example and come before the American people and take that deep bow and say, I’m sorry, and then either do one of two things: resign or go commit suicide.”
(end quote)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.