- This topic has 15 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by 4plexowner.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 13, 2009 at 10:49 AM #15054February 13, 2009 at 12:33 PM #345905crParticipant
Next year’s will be the state of California being evicted from the union.
February 13, 2009 at 12:33 PM #346227crParticipantNext year’s will be the state of California being evicted from the union.
February 13, 2009 at 12:33 PM #346335crParticipantNext year’s will be the state of California being evicted from the union.
February 13, 2009 at 12:33 PM #346368crParticipantNext year’s will be the state of California being evicted from the union.
February 13, 2009 at 12:33 PM #346467crParticipantNext year’s will be the state of California being evicted from the union.
February 13, 2009 at 10:41 PM #346205urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=cooprider]Next year’s will be the state of California being evicted from the union.[/quote]
I would totally be okay with that.
Would we be better or worse without the union?
February 13, 2009 at 10:41 PM #346525urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=cooprider]Next year’s will be the state of California being evicted from the union.[/quote]
I would totally be okay with that.
Would we be better or worse without the union?
February 13, 2009 at 10:41 PM #346635urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=cooprider]Next year’s will be the state of California being evicted from the union.[/quote]
I would totally be okay with that.
Would we be better or worse without the union?
February 13, 2009 at 10:41 PM #346669urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=cooprider]Next year’s will be the state of California being evicted from the union.[/quote]
I would totally be okay with that.
Would we be better or worse without the union?
February 13, 2009 at 10:41 PM #346768urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=cooprider]Next year’s will be the state of California being evicted from the union.[/quote]
I would totally be okay with that.
Would we be better or worse without the union?
February 14, 2009 at 4:31 AM #3462944plexownerParticipantCA is one of the few states that sends more money to the federal govt than it gets in return
that means that we Californians are subsidizing federal spending in Podunk, Iowa for example
nothing against Podunk, Iowa but I’m not interested in paying for their highways, schools, etc
February 14, 2009 at 4:31 AM #3466164plexownerParticipantCA is one of the few states that sends more money to the federal govt than it gets in return
that means that we Californians are subsidizing federal spending in Podunk, Iowa for example
nothing against Podunk, Iowa but I’m not interested in paying for their highways, schools, etc
February 14, 2009 at 4:31 AM #3467264plexownerParticipantCA is one of the few states that sends more money to the federal govt than it gets in return
that means that we Californians are subsidizing federal spending in Podunk, Iowa for example
nothing against Podunk, Iowa but I’m not interested in paying for their highways, schools, etc
February 14, 2009 at 4:31 AM #3467594plexownerParticipantCA is one of the few states that sends more money to the federal govt than it gets in return
that means that we Californians are subsidizing federal spending in Podunk, Iowa for example
nothing against Podunk, Iowa but I’m not interested in paying for their highways, schools, etc
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.