- This topic has 15 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 12 months ago by
4plexowner.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 13, 2009 at 10:49 AM #15054February 13, 2009 at 12:33 PM #345905
cr
ParticipantNext year’s will be the state of California being evicted from the union.
February 13, 2009 at 12:33 PM #346227cr
ParticipantNext year’s will be the state of California being evicted from the union.
February 13, 2009 at 12:33 PM #346335cr
ParticipantNext year’s will be the state of California being evicted from the union.
February 13, 2009 at 12:33 PM #346368cr
ParticipantNext year’s will be the state of California being evicted from the union.
February 13, 2009 at 12:33 PM #346467cr
ParticipantNext year’s will be the state of California being evicted from the union.
February 13, 2009 at 10:41 PM #346205urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=cooprider]Next year’s will be the state of California being evicted from the union.[/quote]
I would totally be okay with that.
Would we be better or worse without the union?
February 13, 2009 at 10:41 PM #346525urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=cooprider]Next year’s will be the state of California being evicted from the union.[/quote]
I would totally be okay with that.
Would we be better or worse without the union?
February 13, 2009 at 10:41 PM #346635urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=cooprider]Next year’s will be the state of California being evicted from the union.[/quote]
I would totally be okay with that.
Would we be better or worse without the union?
February 13, 2009 at 10:41 PM #346669urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=cooprider]Next year’s will be the state of California being evicted from the union.[/quote]
I would totally be okay with that.
Would we be better or worse without the union?
February 13, 2009 at 10:41 PM #346768urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=cooprider]Next year’s will be the state of California being evicted from the union.[/quote]
I would totally be okay with that.
Would we be better or worse without the union?
February 14, 2009 at 4:31 AM #3462944plexowner
ParticipantCA is one of the few states that sends more money to the federal govt than it gets in return
that means that we Californians are subsidizing federal spending in Podunk, Iowa for example
nothing against Podunk, Iowa but I’m not interested in paying for their highways, schools, etc
February 14, 2009 at 4:31 AM #3466164plexowner
ParticipantCA is one of the few states that sends more money to the federal govt than it gets in return
that means that we Californians are subsidizing federal spending in Podunk, Iowa for example
nothing against Podunk, Iowa but I’m not interested in paying for their highways, schools, etc
February 14, 2009 at 4:31 AM #3467264plexowner
ParticipantCA is one of the few states that sends more money to the federal govt than it gets in return
that means that we Californians are subsidizing federal spending in Podunk, Iowa for example
nothing against Podunk, Iowa but I’m not interested in paying for their highways, schools, etc
February 14, 2009 at 4:31 AM #3467594plexowner
ParticipantCA is one of the few states that sends more money to the federal govt than it gets in return
that means that we Californians are subsidizing federal spending in Podunk, Iowa for example
nothing against Podunk, Iowa but I’m not interested in paying for their highways, schools, etc
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
