- This topic has 155 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 16 years ago by
CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 5, 2009 at 9:57 AM #14980February 5, 2009 at 10:17 AM #341198
Ex-SD
ParticipantIs the High End “Correction” Just Starting ?
Yes, it is.
February 5, 2009 at 10:17 AM #341524Ex-SD
ParticipantIs the High End “Correction” Just Starting ?
Yes, it is.
February 5, 2009 at 10:17 AM #341626Ex-SD
ParticipantIs the High End “Correction” Just Starting ?
Yes, it is.
February 5, 2009 at 10:17 AM #341653Ex-SD
ParticipantIs the High End “Correction” Just Starting ?
Yes, it is.
February 5, 2009 at 10:17 AM #341747Ex-SD
ParticipantIs the High End “Correction” Just Starting ?
Yes, it is.
February 5, 2009 at 10:57 AM #341223Scarlett
Participantwhat year’s nominal price?
1997 price adjusted for inflation is equivalent to which year’s nominal price (for the upper tier)?
February 5, 2009 at 10:57 AM #341549Scarlett
Participantwhat year’s nominal price?
1997 price adjusted for inflation is equivalent to which year’s nominal price (for the upper tier)?
February 5, 2009 at 10:57 AM #341651Scarlett
Participantwhat year’s nominal price?
1997 price adjusted for inflation is equivalent to which year’s nominal price (for the upper tier)?
February 5, 2009 at 10:57 AM #341678Scarlett
Participantwhat year’s nominal price?
1997 price adjusted for inflation is equivalent to which year’s nominal price (for the upper tier)?
February 5, 2009 at 10:57 AM #341772Scarlett
Participantwhat year’s nominal price?
1997 price adjusted for inflation is equivalent to which year’s nominal price (for the upper tier)?
February 5, 2009 at 11:15 AM #341238(former)FormerSanDiegan
Participant[quote=Scarlett]what year’s nominal price?
1997 price adjusted for inflation is equivalent to which year’s nominal price (for the upper tier)?
[/quote]I plugged Dec 1996 and Dec 2008 into the calculator below and I got an accumulated inflation of 32%.
So, take your 1997 price, multiply by 1.32 and that is what this guy is predicting. Of course, you’ll have to tack on your own guess for future 2009 and 2010 and 2011 inflation rates.
One item to note is that while the US in general was at a long-term trend line in 1997, Southern California was below it’s long-term trend line at that point.
February 5, 2009 at 11:15 AM #341564(former)FormerSanDiegan
Participant[quote=Scarlett]what year’s nominal price?
1997 price adjusted for inflation is equivalent to which year’s nominal price (for the upper tier)?
[/quote]I plugged Dec 1996 and Dec 2008 into the calculator below and I got an accumulated inflation of 32%.
So, take your 1997 price, multiply by 1.32 and that is what this guy is predicting. Of course, you’ll have to tack on your own guess for future 2009 and 2010 and 2011 inflation rates.
One item to note is that while the US in general was at a long-term trend line in 1997, Southern California was below it’s long-term trend line at that point.
February 5, 2009 at 11:15 AM #341666(former)FormerSanDiegan
Participant[quote=Scarlett]what year’s nominal price?
1997 price adjusted for inflation is equivalent to which year’s nominal price (for the upper tier)?
[/quote]I plugged Dec 1996 and Dec 2008 into the calculator below and I got an accumulated inflation of 32%.
So, take your 1997 price, multiply by 1.32 and that is what this guy is predicting. Of course, you’ll have to tack on your own guess for future 2009 and 2010 and 2011 inflation rates.
One item to note is that while the US in general was at a long-term trend line in 1997, Southern California was below it’s long-term trend line at that point.
February 5, 2009 at 11:15 AM #341693(former)FormerSanDiegan
Participant[quote=Scarlett]what year’s nominal price?
1997 price adjusted for inflation is equivalent to which year’s nominal price (for the upper tier)?
[/quote]I plugged Dec 1996 and Dec 2008 into the calculator below and I got an accumulated inflation of 32%.
So, take your 1997 price, multiply by 1.32 and that is what this guy is predicting. Of course, you’ll have to tack on your own guess for future 2009 and 2010 and 2011 inflation rates.
One item to note is that while the US in general was at a long-term trend line in 1997, Southern California was below it’s long-term trend line at that point.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.