- This topic has 20 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by
scaredyclassic.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 30, 2008 at 8:58 PM #14327October 31, 2008 at 12:56 PM #295719
Doofrat
ParticipantLooks like the exuberance isn’t there anymore.
October 31, 2008 at 12:56 PM #296057Doofrat
ParticipantLooks like the exuberance isn’t there anymore.
October 31, 2008 at 12:56 PM #296079Doofrat
ParticipantLooks like the exuberance isn’t there anymore.
October 31, 2008 at 12:56 PM #296090Doofrat
ParticipantLooks like the exuberance isn’t there anymore.
October 31, 2008 at 12:56 PM #296131Doofrat
ParticipantLooks like the exuberance isn’t there anymore.
October 31, 2008 at 3:17 PM #296150cr
Participant[quote=doofrat]Looks like the exuberance isn’t there anymore.[/quote]
Definately not. But…
[quote=scaredycat]Basically, the bank could take the highest bid, or leave it, or counter.[/quote]
It sounds like banks are still holding on to false hope that housing may turn around next year. What basis they have for that is beyond me, but I’m looking forward to when the consensus is housing will never trend upward again. Then I’ll buy.
It sounds like they did sell though, so that’s a good sign.
799k to 240k = ouch! 70% drop!
October 31, 2008 at 3:17 PM #296191cr
Participant[quote=doofrat]Looks like the exuberance isn’t there anymore.[/quote]
Definately not. But…
[quote=scaredycat]Basically, the bank could take the highest bid, or leave it, or counter.[/quote]
It sounds like banks are still holding on to false hope that housing may turn around next year. What basis they have for that is beyond me, but I’m looking forward to when the consensus is housing will never trend upward again. Then I’ll buy.
It sounds like they did sell though, so that’s a good sign.
799k to 240k = ouch! 70% drop!
October 31, 2008 at 3:17 PM #296139cr
Participant[quote=doofrat]Looks like the exuberance isn’t there anymore.[/quote]
Definately not. But…
[quote=scaredycat]Basically, the bank could take the highest bid, or leave it, or counter.[/quote]
It sounds like banks are still holding on to false hope that housing may turn around next year. What basis they have for that is beyond me, but I’m looking forward to when the consensus is housing will never trend upward again. Then I’ll buy.
It sounds like they did sell though, so that’s a good sign.
799k to 240k = ouch! 70% drop!
October 31, 2008 at 3:17 PM #296117cr
Participant[quote=doofrat]Looks like the exuberance isn’t there anymore.[/quote]
Definately not. But…
[quote=scaredycat]Basically, the bank could take the highest bid, or leave it, or counter.[/quote]
It sounds like banks are still holding on to false hope that housing may turn around next year. What basis they have for that is beyond me, but I’m looking forward to when the consensus is housing will never trend upward again. Then I’ll buy.
It sounds like they did sell though, so that’s a good sign.
799k to 240k = ouch! 70% drop!
October 31, 2008 at 3:17 PM #295778cr
Participant[quote=doofrat]Looks like the exuberance isn’t there anymore.[/quote]
Definately not. But…
[quote=scaredycat]Basically, the bank could take the highest bid, or leave it, or counter.[/quote]
It sounds like banks are still holding on to false hope that housing may turn around next year. What basis they have for that is beyond me, but I’m looking forward to when the consensus is housing will never trend upward again. Then I’ll buy.
It sounds like they did sell though, so that’s a good sign.
799k to 240k = ouch! 70% drop!
November 1, 2008 at 1:18 AM #295974barnaby33
Participantcooprider, I believe he said that they *might* have sold. The bank could still keep shopping, because it wasn’t a real auction with a published reserve.
JoshNovember 1, 2008 at 1:18 AM #296313barnaby33
Participantcooprider, I believe he said that they *might* have sold. The bank could still keep shopping, because it wasn’t a real auction with a published reserve.
JoshNovember 1, 2008 at 1:18 AM #296334barnaby33
Participantcooprider, I believe he said that they *might* have sold. The bank could still keep shopping, because it wasn’t a real auction with a published reserve.
JoshNovember 1, 2008 at 1:18 AM #296345barnaby33
Participantcooprider, I believe he said that they *might* have sold. The bank could still keep shopping, because it wasn’t a real auction with a published reserve.
Josh -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.