- This topic has 245 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 2 months ago by peterb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 13, 2008 at 9:55 PM #14203October 13, 2008 at 10:10 PM #286971CoronitaParticipant
I wish I could threaten to sue to have my principle or loan payment lowered. Sue for being overly responsible.
October 13, 2008 at 10:10 PM #287268CoronitaParticipantI wish I could threaten to sue to have my principle or loan payment lowered. Sue for being overly responsible.
October 13, 2008 at 10:10 PM #287285CoronitaParticipantI wish I could threaten to sue to have my principle or loan payment lowered. Sue for being overly responsible.
October 13, 2008 at 10:10 PM #287310CoronitaParticipantI wish I could threaten to sue to have my principle or loan payment lowered. Sue for being overly responsible.
October 13, 2008 at 10:10 PM #287317CoronitaParticipantI wish I could threaten to sue to have my principle or loan payment lowered. Sue for being overly responsible.
October 13, 2008 at 10:19 PM #286976SD RealtorParticipantDJC you cannot open that box…
You see this issue extends to the greater moral hazard that is not only being ignored by the government, but so far by courts. I cannot believe we will not see cases cropping up soon.
Seriously what will happen when thousands, or shall I say tens of thousands of people receive such treatment. Maybe even hundreds of thousands? Who makes the choice? Who makes the rules? When the first lawsuits come, and they will… how will courts rule? Because if courts side with the first plaintiffs that get pissed of because the neighbor next door received a rework and principal reduction while he did not then it seems to me the entire bailout will be jeopardized.
I have already seen a few situations of interest rate reworks but no principal reductions yet.
However it is arguable that even these sort of reworks create a potential source for litigation don’t they?
October 13, 2008 at 10:19 PM #287273SD RealtorParticipantDJC you cannot open that box…
You see this issue extends to the greater moral hazard that is not only being ignored by the government, but so far by courts. I cannot believe we will not see cases cropping up soon.
Seriously what will happen when thousands, or shall I say tens of thousands of people receive such treatment. Maybe even hundreds of thousands? Who makes the choice? Who makes the rules? When the first lawsuits come, and they will… how will courts rule? Because if courts side with the first plaintiffs that get pissed of because the neighbor next door received a rework and principal reduction while he did not then it seems to me the entire bailout will be jeopardized.
I have already seen a few situations of interest rate reworks but no principal reductions yet.
However it is arguable that even these sort of reworks create a potential source for litigation don’t they?
October 13, 2008 at 10:19 PM #287290SD RealtorParticipantDJC you cannot open that box…
You see this issue extends to the greater moral hazard that is not only being ignored by the government, but so far by courts. I cannot believe we will not see cases cropping up soon.
Seriously what will happen when thousands, or shall I say tens of thousands of people receive such treatment. Maybe even hundreds of thousands? Who makes the choice? Who makes the rules? When the first lawsuits come, and they will… how will courts rule? Because if courts side with the first plaintiffs that get pissed of because the neighbor next door received a rework and principal reduction while he did not then it seems to me the entire bailout will be jeopardized.
I have already seen a few situations of interest rate reworks but no principal reductions yet.
However it is arguable that even these sort of reworks create a potential source for litigation don’t they?
October 13, 2008 at 10:19 PM #287315SD RealtorParticipantDJC you cannot open that box…
You see this issue extends to the greater moral hazard that is not only being ignored by the government, but so far by courts. I cannot believe we will not see cases cropping up soon.
Seriously what will happen when thousands, or shall I say tens of thousands of people receive such treatment. Maybe even hundreds of thousands? Who makes the choice? Who makes the rules? When the first lawsuits come, and they will… how will courts rule? Because if courts side with the first plaintiffs that get pissed of because the neighbor next door received a rework and principal reduction while he did not then it seems to me the entire bailout will be jeopardized.
I have already seen a few situations of interest rate reworks but no principal reductions yet.
However it is arguable that even these sort of reworks create a potential source for litigation don’t they?
October 13, 2008 at 10:19 PM #287322SD RealtorParticipantDJC you cannot open that box…
You see this issue extends to the greater moral hazard that is not only being ignored by the government, but so far by courts. I cannot believe we will not see cases cropping up soon.
Seriously what will happen when thousands, or shall I say tens of thousands of people receive such treatment. Maybe even hundreds of thousands? Who makes the choice? Who makes the rules? When the first lawsuits come, and they will… how will courts rule? Because if courts side with the first plaintiffs that get pissed of because the neighbor next door received a rework and principal reduction while he did not then it seems to me the entire bailout will be jeopardized.
I have already seen a few situations of interest rate reworks but no principal reductions yet.
However it is arguable that even these sort of reworks create a potential source for litigation don’t they?
October 14, 2008 at 8:06 AM #287042SDownerParticipantI cannot believe this. Responsibility is being punished while people who are not are rewarded. This will only encourage further deliquency in payments.
Okay, now I need to know how to divert my cash reserves and default on a recourse loan without if affecting my assets.
October 14, 2008 at 8:06 AM #287338SDownerParticipantI cannot believe this. Responsibility is being punished while people who are not are rewarded. This will only encourage further deliquency in payments.
Okay, now I need to know how to divert my cash reserves and default on a recourse loan without if affecting my assets.
October 14, 2008 at 8:06 AM #287355SDownerParticipantI cannot believe this. Responsibility is being punished while people who are not are rewarded. This will only encourage further deliquency in payments.
Okay, now I need to know how to divert my cash reserves and default on a recourse loan without if affecting my assets.
October 14, 2008 at 8:06 AM #287382SDownerParticipantI cannot believe this. Responsibility is being punished while people who are not are rewarded. This will only encourage further deliquency in payments.
Okay, now I need to know how to divert my cash reserves and default on a recourse loan without if affecting my assets.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.