- This topic has 60 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by
jpinpb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 12, 2008 at 6:52 PM #14193October 12, 2008 at 6:55 PM #286513
jficquette
ParticipantGovernment employees shouldn’t get pensions. Let them buy into a 401k if they want to save. Why should they get anything private sector employees don’t generally get?
October 12, 2008 at 6:55 PM #286806jficquette
ParticipantGovernment employees shouldn’t get pensions. Let them buy into a 401k if they want to save. Why should they get anything private sector employees don’t generally get?
October 12, 2008 at 6:55 PM #286824jficquette
ParticipantGovernment employees shouldn’t get pensions. Let them buy into a 401k if they want to save. Why should they get anything private sector employees don’t generally get?
October 12, 2008 at 6:55 PM #286851jficquette
ParticipantGovernment employees shouldn’t get pensions. Let them buy into a 401k if they want to save. Why should they get anything private sector employees don’t generally get?
October 12, 2008 at 6:55 PM #286855jficquette
ParticipantGovernment employees shouldn’t get pensions. Let them buy into a 401k if they want to save. Why should they get anything private sector employees don’t generally get?
October 13, 2008 at 8:03 AM #286959pedrocon
Participanttheir base incomes tend to be lower.
October 13, 2008 at 8:03 AM #286990pedrocon
Participanttheir base incomes tend to be lower.
October 13, 2008 at 8:03 AM #286986pedrocon
Participanttheir base incomes tend to be lower.
October 13, 2008 at 8:03 AM #286941pedrocon
Participanttheir base incomes tend to be lower.
October 13, 2008 at 8:03 AM #286648pedrocon
Participanttheir base incomes tend to be lower.
October 13, 2008 at 8:44 AM #286963EconProf
ParticipantFair comparisons would not show their base incomes to be lower, on average. That is a shibboleth pushed by the public employee unions.
The best evidence is the voluntary turnover rate in private vs. public employment. How many teachers, police & fire personnel, prison guards & secretaries quit to join the private sector? Not many, because the package of pay, security, fringe benefits, and retirement are now relatively attractive.October 13, 2008 at 8:44 AM #286979EconProf
ParticipantFair comparisons would not show their base incomes to be lower, on average. That is a shibboleth pushed by the public employee unions.
The best evidence is the voluntary turnover rate in private vs. public employment. How many teachers, police & fire personnel, prison guards & secretaries quit to join the private sector? Not many, because the package of pay, security, fringe benefits, and retirement are now relatively attractive.October 13, 2008 at 8:44 AM #286668EconProf
ParticipantFair comparisons would not show their base incomes to be lower, on average. That is a shibboleth pushed by the public employee unions.
The best evidence is the voluntary turnover rate in private vs. public employment. How many teachers, police & fire personnel, prison guards & secretaries quit to join the private sector? Not many, because the package of pay, security, fringe benefits, and retirement are now relatively attractive.October 13, 2008 at 8:44 AM #287006EconProf
ParticipantFair comparisons would not show their base incomes to be lower, on average. That is a shibboleth pushed by the public employee unions.
The best evidence is the voluntary turnover rate in private vs. public employment. How many teachers, police & fire personnel, prison guards & secretaries quit to join the private sector? Not many, because the package of pay, security, fringe benefits, and retirement are now relatively attractive. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.