Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Treasuries, another bubble?
- This topic has 65 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 11, 2008 at 3:33 PM #14180October 11, 2008 at 4:40 PM #285783stansdParticipant
The only thing you are missing is the naivete of the investing public, the false assumption that the American empire can’t go under, and possibly the blind faith that the foreigners who supply our credit won’t pull our line in the face of their own economic insecurity and our profligacy.
OTOH, it may be more of a relative judgment…outside of Gold, if the U.S. were to suffer economic catastrophe, what investments wouldn’t go with it. Decouping hasn’t happened.
Regardless, this will end. The only thing giving me some confidence in the American economy is the fact that we don’t have the same level of unionization nor the same size public sector as other world economic powers-all things that will slow the adjustment of prices and wages toward the new equilibrium.
On that note, people have no idea how fast the unemployment rate is about to skyrocket. Not only are companies laying off workers, but boomers will be retiring at a slower rate, and people who were retired or semi-retired will be re-entering the workforce as their savings evaporate.
My bet is 10% Unemployment by June.
Stan
October 11, 2008 at 4:40 PM #286075stansdParticipantThe only thing you are missing is the naivete of the investing public, the false assumption that the American empire can’t go under, and possibly the blind faith that the foreigners who supply our credit won’t pull our line in the face of their own economic insecurity and our profligacy.
OTOH, it may be more of a relative judgment…outside of Gold, if the U.S. were to suffer economic catastrophe, what investments wouldn’t go with it. Decouping hasn’t happened.
Regardless, this will end. The only thing giving me some confidence in the American economy is the fact that we don’t have the same level of unionization nor the same size public sector as other world economic powers-all things that will slow the adjustment of prices and wages toward the new equilibrium.
On that note, people have no idea how fast the unemployment rate is about to skyrocket. Not only are companies laying off workers, but boomers will be retiring at a slower rate, and people who were retired or semi-retired will be re-entering the workforce as their savings evaporate.
My bet is 10% Unemployment by June.
Stan
October 11, 2008 at 4:40 PM #286096stansdParticipantThe only thing you are missing is the naivete of the investing public, the false assumption that the American empire can’t go under, and possibly the blind faith that the foreigners who supply our credit won’t pull our line in the face of their own economic insecurity and our profligacy.
OTOH, it may be more of a relative judgment…outside of Gold, if the U.S. were to suffer economic catastrophe, what investments wouldn’t go with it. Decouping hasn’t happened.
Regardless, this will end. The only thing giving me some confidence in the American economy is the fact that we don’t have the same level of unionization nor the same size public sector as other world economic powers-all things that will slow the adjustment of prices and wages toward the new equilibrium.
On that note, people have no idea how fast the unemployment rate is about to skyrocket. Not only are companies laying off workers, but boomers will be retiring at a slower rate, and people who were retired or semi-retired will be re-entering the workforce as their savings evaporate.
My bet is 10% Unemployment by June.
Stan
October 11, 2008 at 4:40 PM #286119stansdParticipantThe only thing you are missing is the naivete of the investing public, the false assumption that the American empire can’t go under, and possibly the blind faith that the foreigners who supply our credit won’t pull our line in the face of their own economic insecurity and our profligacy.
OTOH, it may be more of a relative judgment…outside of Gold, if the U.S. were to suffer economic catastrophe, what investments wouldn’t go with it. Decouping hasn’t happened.
Regardless, this will end. The only thing giving me some confidence in the American economy is the fact that we don’t have the same level of unionization nor the same size public sector as other world economic powers-all things that will slow the adjustment of prices and wages toward the new equilibrium.
On that note, people have no idea how fast the unemployment rate is about to skyrocket. Not only are companies laying off workers, but boomers will be retiring at a slower rate, and people who were retired or semi-retired will be re-entering the workforce as their savings evaporate.
My bet is 10% Unemployment by June.
Stan
October 11, 2008 at 4:40 PM #286127stansdParticipantThe only thing you are missing is the naivete of the investing public, the false assumption that the American empire can’t go under, and possibly the blind faith that the foreigners who supply our credit won’t pull our line in the face of their own economic insecurity and our profligacy.
OTOH, it may be more of a relative judgment…outside of Gold, if the U.S. were to suffer economic catastrophe, what investments wouldn’t go with it. Decouping hasn’t happened.
Regardless, this will end. The only thing giving me some confidence in the American economy is the fact that we don’t have the same level of unionization nor the same size public sector as other world economic powers-all things that will slow the adjustment of prices and wages toward the new equilibrium.
On that note, people have no idea how fast the unemployment rate is about to skyrocket. Not only are companies laying off workers, but boomers will be retiring at a slower rate, and people who were retired or semi-retired will be re-entering the workforce as their savings evaporate.
My bet is 10% Unemployment by June.
Stan
October 11, 2008 at 9:58 PM #286411underdoseParticipant[quote=stansd]The only thing you are missing is the naivete of the investing public, the false assumption that the American empire can’t go under, and possibly the blind faith that the foreigners who supply our credit won’t pull our line in the face of their own economic insecurity and our profligacy.
[/quote]As I said, misplaced confidence. I’m glad to hear I’m not the only one that thinks this. So you chalk it up to naivete. Can anyone refute, or are we in 100% agreement that bonds have to tank sooner or later? The only gotcha I can think of is Bernanke’s 2002 speech in which he said the Fed could print new money and buy treasuries with it in order to try to manipulate long term interest rates. But again, even if he manages to keep the yields low and prices don’t tank nominally, the dollar would be completely worthless before 10 years are up.
October 11, 2008 at 9:58 PM #286439underdoseParticipant[quote=stansd]The only thing you are missing is the naivete of the investing public, the false assumption that the American empire can’t go under, and possibly the blind faith that the foreigners who supply our credit won’t pull our line in the face of their own economic insecurity and our profligacy.
[/quote]As I said, misplaced confidence. I’m glad to hear I’m not the only one that thinks this. So you chalk it up to naivete. Can anyone refute, or are we in 100% agreement that bonds have to tank sooner or later? The only gotcha I can think of is Bernanke’s 2002 speech in which he said the Fed could print new money and buy treasuries with it in order to try to manipulate long term interest rates. But again, even if he manages to keep the yields low and prices don’t tank nominally, the dollar would be completely worthless before 10 years are up.
October 11, 2008 at 9:58 PM #286436underdoseParticipant[quote=stansd]The only thing you are missing is the naivete of the investing public, the false assumption that the American empire can’t go under, and possibly the blind faith that the foreigners who supply our credit won’t pull our line in the face of their own economic insecurity and our profligacy.
[/quote]As I said, misplaced confidence. I’m glad to hear I’m not the only one that thinks this. So you chalk it up to naivete. Can anyone refute, or are we in 100% agreement that bonds have to tank sooner or later? The only gotcha I can think of is Bernanke’s 2002 speech in which he said the Fed could print new money and buy treasuries with it in order to try to manipulate long term interest rates. But again, even if he manages to keep the yields low and prices don’t tank nominally, the dollar would be completely worthless before 10 years are up.
October 11, 2008 at 9:58 PM #286392underdoseParticipant[quote=stansd]The only thing you are missing is the naivete of the investing public, the false assumption that the American empire can’t go under, and possibly the blind faith that the foreigners who supply our credit won’t pull our line in the face of their own economic insecurity and our profligacy.
[/quote]As I said, misplaced confidence. I’m glad to hear I’m not the only one that thinks this. So you chalk it up to naivete. Can anyone refute, or are we in 100% agreement that bonds have to tank sooner or later? The only gotcha I can think of is Bernanke’s 2002 speech in which he said the Fed could print new money and buy treasuries with it in order to try to manipulate long term interest rates. But again, even if he manages to keep the yields low and prices don’t tank nominally, the dollar would be completely worthless before 10 years are up.
October 11, 2008 at 9:58 PM #286098underdoseParticipant[quote=stansd]The only thing you are missing is the naivete of the investing public, the false assumption that the American empire can’t go under, and possibly the blind faith that the foreigners who supply our credit won’t pull our line in the face of their own economic insecurity and our profligacy.
[/quote]As I said, misplaced confidence. I’m glad to hear I’m not the only one that thinks this. So you chalk it up to naivete. Can anyone refute, or are we in 100% agreement that bonds have to tank sooner or later? The only gotcha I can think of is Bernanke’s 2002 speech in which he said the Fed could print new money and buy treasuries with it in order to try to manipulate long term interest rates. But again, even if he manages to keep the yields low and prices don’t tank nominally, the dollar would be completely worthless before 10 years are up.
October 12, 2008 at 8:41 AM #286263jficquetteParticipantBond bubble is what is behind this whole mess. Not sure how it is resolved since brutal deflation is inevitable.
October 12, 2008 at 8:41 AM #286557jficquetteParticipantBond bubble is what is behind this whole mess. Not sure how it is resolved since brutal deflation is inevitable.
October 12, 2008 at 8:41 AM #286574jficquetteParticipantBond bubble is what is behind this whole mess. Not sure how it is resolved since brutal deflation is inevitable.
October 12, 2008 at 8:41 AM #286600jficquetteParticipantBond bubble is what is behind this whole mess. Not sure how it is resolved since brutal deflation is inevitable.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.