- This topic has 225 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by gandalf.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 29, 2008 at 8:38 AM #13685August 29, 2008 at 8:51 AM #262980svelteParticipant
lol.
It’s a very calculated move. He’s still trying to coax Hillary supporters over and took on a sidekick that has virtually no track record – gives the Dems almost nothing to pick apart.
But – to bring someone on who is currently under investigation? That leaves me a little astounded.
August 29, 2008 at 8:51 AM #263188svelteParticipantlol.
It’s a very calculated move. He’s still trying to coax Hillary supporters over and took on a sidekick that has virtually no track record – gives the Dems almost nothing to pick apart.
But – to bring someone on who is currently under investigation? That leaves me a little astounded.
August 29, 2008 at 8:51 AM #263194svelteParticipantlol.
It’s a very calculated move. He’s still trying to coax Hillary supporters over and took on a sidekick that has virtually no track record – gives the Dems almost nothing to pick apart.
But – to bring someone on who is currently under investigation? That leaves me a little astounded.
August 29, 2008 at 8:51 AM #263246svelteParticipantlol.
It’s a very calculated move. He’s still trying to coax Hillary supporters over and took on a sidekick that has virtually no track record – gives the Dems almost nothing to pick apart.
But – to bring someone on who is currently under investigation? That leaves me a little astounded.
August 29, 2008 at 8:51 AM #263283svelteParticipantlol.
It’s a very calculated move. He’s still trying to coax Hillary supporters over and took on a sidekick that has virtually no track record – gives the Dems almost nothing to pick apart.
But – to bring someone on who is currently under investigation? That leaves me a little astounded.
August 29, 2008 at 8:52 AM #262985Diego MamaniParticipantShe’d be a refreshing change after Dick Cheney. Nice smile too.
But isn’t it too obvious that John McSame is pandering to women?
August 29, 2008 at 8:52 AM #263193Diego MamaniParticipantShe’d be a refreshing change after Dick Cheney. Nice smile too.
But isn’t it too obvious that John McSame is pandering to women?
August 29, 2008 at 8:52 AM #263199Diego MamaniParticipantShe’d be a refreshing change after Dick Cheney. Nice smile too.
But isn’t it too obvious that John McSame is pandering to women?
August 29, 2008 at 8:52 AM #263251Diego MamaniParticipantShe’d be a refreshing change after Dick Cheney. Nice smile too.
But isn’t it too obvious that John McSame is pandering to women?
August 29, 2008 at 8:52 AM #263288Diego MamaniParticipantShe’d be a refreshing change after Dick Cheney. Nice smile too.
But isn’t it too obvious that John McSame is pandering to women?
August 29, 2008 at 8:57 AM #262995Ex-SDParticipantThe Dem’s should feel very comfortable with her since she’s under investigation. Wasn’t that one of the highlights of the entire Clinton reign?
BWaaaaaaaaaaa haaaaaaaaaaa haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaAugust 29, 2008 at 8:57 AM #263203Ex-SDParticipantThe Dem’s should feel very comfortable with her since she’s under investigation. Wasn’t that one of the highlights of the entire Clinton reign?
BWaaaaaaaaaaa haaaaaaaaaaa haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaAugust 29, 2008 at 8:57 AM #263207Ex-SDParticipantThe Dem’s should feel very comfortable with her since she’s under investigation. Wasn’t that one of the highlights of the entire Clinton reign?
BWaaaaaaaaaaa haaaaaaaaaaa haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaAugust 29, 2008 at 8:57 AM #263261Ex-SDParticipantThe Dem’s should feel very comfortable with her since she’s under investigation. Wasn’t that one of the highlights of the entire Clinton reign?
BWaaaaaaaaaaa haaaaaaaaaaa haaaaaaaaaaaaaaa -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.