Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › CDS (Credit Default Swaps)
- This topic has 10 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 5 months ago by
patb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 13, 2008 at 8:01 PM #13035June 15, 2008 at 6:42 PM #222841
barnaby33ParticipantLots of numbers get thrown around with how big the market place is. The thing to keep in mind is that the real damage isn’t in the notional value of the CDS’s(which are insurance policies of a sort), but the underlying that they are insuring against. Thats a much smaller, but still staggeringly large number.
June 15, 2008 at 6:42 PM #222944
barnaby33ParticipantLots of numbers get thrown around with how big the market place is. The thing to keep in mind is that the real damage isn’t in the notional value of the CDS’s(which are insurance policies of a sort), but the underlying that they are insuring against. Thats a much smaller, but still staggeringly large number.
June 15, 2008 at 6:42 PM #222958
barnaby33ParticipantLots of numbers get thrown around with how big the market place is. The thing to keep in mind is that the real damage isn’t in the notional value of the CDS’s(which are insurance policies of a sort), but the underlying that they are insuring against. Thats a much smaller, but still staggeringly large number.
June 15, 2008 at 6:42 PM #222989
barnaby33ParticipantLots of numbers get thrown around with how big the market place is. The thing to keep in mind is that the real damage isn’t in the notional value of the CDS’s(which are insurance policies of a sort), but the underlying that they are insuring against. Thats a much smaller, but still staggeringly large number.
June 15, 2008 at 6:42 PM #223005
barnaby33ParticipantLots of numbers get thrown around with how big the market place is. The thing to keep in mind is that the real damage isn’t in the notional value of the CDS’s(which are insurance policies of a sort), but the underlying that they are insuring against. Thats a much smaller, but still staggeringly large number.
June 15, 2008 at 8:46 PM #222869patb
Participanti wory about how this settles at 0 percent loss when a company
goes downJune 15, 2008 at 8:46 PM #222976patb
Participanti wory about how this settles at 0 percent loss when a company
goes downJune 15, 2008 at 8:46 PM #222988patb
Participanti wory about how this settles at 0 percent loss when a company
goes downJune 15, 2008 at 8:46 PM #223021patb
Participanti wory about how this settles at 0 percent loss when a company
goes downJune 15, 2008 at 8:46 PM #223034patb
Participanti wory about how this settles at 0 percent loss when a company
goes down -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
