- This topic has 70 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 6 months ago by Casca.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 23, 2008 at 9:20 PM #12837May 23, 2008 at 10:40 PM #210901ucodegenParticipant
This may create some flames, but my opinion is that Hillary wants to win the election primarily for herself, not for the people of the United States. It is a very important ‘goal’ for herself. The problem is that it has blinded her to the fact that ‘the people matter’. I feel she wants to win so bad that she will literally sell her soul to get the win, and that is something that really scares me about her.
And if you don’t believe me, please explain why the thought of losing makes her so emotional.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20080107/emotional-clinton/
She pawns it off on wanting the best for the people but you look at some of her attacks, including on Obama and you have to wonder. Dirty politics does not bring good things to the American people.
May 23, 2008 at 10:40 PM #210968ucodegenParticipantThis may create some flames, but my opinion is that Hillary wants to win the election primarily for herself, not for the people of the United States. It is a very important ‘goal’ for herself. The problem is that it has blinded her to the fact that ‘the people matter’. I feel she wants to win so bad that she will literally sell her soul to get the win, and that is something that really scares me about her.
And if you don’t believe me, please explain why the thought of losing makes her so emotional.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20080107/emotional-clinton/
She pawns it off on wanting the best for the people but you look at some of her attacks, including on Obama and you have to wonder. Dirty politics does not bring good things to the American people.
May 23, 2008 at 10:40 PM #211054ucodegenParticipantThis may create some flames, but my opinion is that Hillary wants to win the election primarily for herself, not for the people of the United States. It is a very important ‘goal’ for herself. The problem is that it has blinded her to the fact that ‘the people matter’. I feel she wants to win so bad that she will literally sell her soul to get the win, and that is something that really scares me about her.
And if you don’t believe me, please explain why the thought of losing makes her so emotional.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20080107/emotional-clinton/
She pawns it off on wanting the best for the people but you look at some of her attacks, including on Obama and you have to wonder. Dirty politics does not bring good things to the American people.
May 23, 2008 at 10:40 PM #210997ucodegenParticipantThis may create some flames, but my opinion is that Hillary wants to win the election primarily for herself, not for the people of the United States. It is a very important ‘goal’ for herself. The problem is that it has blinded her to the fact that ‘the people matter’. I feel she wants to win so bad that she will literally sell her soul to get the win, and that is something that really scares me about her.
And if you don’t believe me, please explain why the thought of losing makes her so emotional.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20080107/emotional-clinton/
She pawns it off on wanting the best for the people but you look at some of her attacks, including on Obama and you have to wonder. Dirty politics does not bring good things to the American people.
May 23, 2008 at 10:40 PM #211020ucodegenParticipantThis may create some flames, but my opinion is that Hillary wants to win the election primarily for herself, not for the people of the United States. It is a very important ‘goal’ for herself. The problem is that it has blinded her to the fact that ‘the people matter’. I feel she wants to win so bad that she will literally sell her soul to get the win, and that is something that really scares me about her.
And if you don’t believe me, please explain why the thought of losing makes her so emotional.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20080107/emotional-clinton/
She pawns it off on wanting the best for the people but you look at some of her attacks, including on Obama and you have to wonder. Dirty politics does not bring good things to the American people.
May 23, 2008 at 11:55 PM #211078jParticipantI think Clinton actually has a great strategy. The next president and his party will be blamed for the Great Recession. She is insuring that McCain will win by weakening Obauma, so she can run 2012.
She will be a great president, because times will get better under her administration. It will not be because “you can only go up once you hit bottom”.
After all her husband was given credit for the Internet boom that started when the Internet was privatised in 1992 (under Bush 41,just one day after Gore created it). It is not what you do, but what you get credit for doing.
May 23, 2008 at 11:55 PM #211045jParticipantI think Clinton actually has a great strategy. The next president and his party will be blamed for the Great Recession. She is insuring that McCain will win by weakening Obauma, so she can run 2012.
She will be a great president, because times will get better under her administration. It will not be because “you can only go up once you hit bottom”.
After all her husband was given credit for the Internet boom that started when the Internet was privatised in 1992 (under Bush 41,just one day after Gore created it). It is not what you do, but what you get credit for doing.
May 23, 2008 at 11:55 PM #210993jParticipantI think Clinton actually has a great strategy. The next president and his party will be blamed for the Great Recession. She is insuring that McCain will win by weakening Obauma, so she can run 2012.
She will be a great president, because times will get better under her administration. It will not be because “you can only go up once you hit bottom”.
After all her husband was given credit for the Internet boom that started when the Internet was privatised in 1992 (under Bush 41,just one day after Gore created it). It is not what you do, but what you get credit for doing.
May 23, 2008 at 11:55 PM #210926jParticipantI think Clinton actually has a great strategy. The next president and his party will be blamed for the Great Recession. She is insuring that McCain will win by weakening Obauma, so she can run 2012.
She will be a great president, because times will get better under her administration. It will not be because “you can only go up once you hit bottom”.
After all her husband was given credit for the Internet boom that started when the Internet was privatised in 1992 (under Bush 41,just one day after Gore created it). It is not what you do, but what you get credit for doing.
May 23, 2008 at 11:55 PM #211022jParticipantI think Clinton actually has a great strategy. The next president and his party will be blamed for the Great Recession. She is insuring that McCain will win by weakening Obauma, so she can run 2012.
She will be a great president, because times will get better under her administration. It will not be because “you can only go up once you hit bottom”.
After all her husband was given credit for the Internet boom that started when the Internet was privatised in 1992 (under Bush 41,just one day after Gore created it). It is not what you do, but what you get credit for doing.
May 24, 2008 at 10:09 AM #211016speedingpulletParticipantI know she’s brought down a TON of ire on the blogs about this soundbite. Lots of people calling for her to step down and/or keep taking the meds…
Even though I’m an Obama supporter, I think she simply misspoke. They both look dog-tired at this point. She could have been a bit more gracious about her ‘apology’ – especially as she seems to have missed the point about her inference re: Obama/assassination by concentrating instead on just saying sorry to the Kennedys.
Still, the Obama camp seem to be leaving it alone, so if they’re not worried, neither am I. I certainly don’t think she needs some of the things described (in detail) that I’ve read on the likes of Huffpost…Bad luck too, on it running all over the Memorial Day weekend.
She’ll drag this on until the bitter end – that being around midnight of June 3rd. I think she’s thoroughly scuppered her chances, if she ever had any, of getting the VP slot, and I hope for her sake that she doesn’t suffer from another ‘foot-in-mouth’ moment before the inevitable conclusion of this bunfight.
I’d never vote for her if she was the nominee, and I’d have to think long and hard about withholding my vote, should she be chosen as Obama’s VP, but I think its best just to wait this out – she will eventually have to step down, and there’s nothing anyone (besides herself) that can do to dissuade or coerce her into doing it sooner.
I lived in London during Bill Clinton’s presidency, so only have a filtered – but largely favourable – memory of his time in office. But this whole campaign has lowered my estimation of them greatly. I know that alls fair in love and politics, but I don’t think I’ve ever seen two people so power-hungry (and obvious about it) in my life.
Roll on november, and lets hope this fiasco doesn’t drag on until the DNC.
May 24, 2008 at 10:09 AM #211135speedingpulletParticipantI know she’s brought down a TON of ire on the blogs about this soundbite. Lots of people calling for her to step down and/or keep taking the meds…
Even though I’m an Obama supporter, I think she simply misspoke. They both look dog-tired at this point. She could have been a bit more gracious about her ‘apology’ – especially as she seems to have missed the point about her inference re: Obama/assassination by concentrating instead on just saying sorry to the Kennedys.
Still, the Obama camp seem to be leaving it alone, so if they’re not worried, neither am I. I certainly don’t think she needs some of the things described (in detail) that I’ve read on the likes of Huffpost…Bad luck too, on it running all over the Memorial Day weekend.
She’ll drag this on until the bitter end – that being around midnight of June 3rd. I think she’s thoroughly scuppered her chances, if she ever had any, of getting the VP slot, and I hope for her sake that she doesn’t suffer from another ‘foot-in-mouth’ moment before the inevitable conclusion of this bunfight.
I’d never vote for her if she was the nominee, and I’d have to think long and hard about withholding my vote, should she be chosen as Obama’s VP, but I think its best just to wait this out – she will eventually have to step down, and there’s nothing anyone (besides herself) that can do to dissuade or coerce her into doing it sooner.
I lived in London during Bill Clinton’s presidency, so only have a filtered – but largely favourable – memory of his time in office. But this whole campaign has lowered my estimation of them greatly. I know that alls fair in love and politics, but I don’t think I’ve ever seen two people so power-hungry (and obvious about it) in my life.
Roll on november, and lets hope this fiasco doesn’t drag on until the DNC.
May 24, 2008 at 10:09 AM #211168speedingpulletParticipantI know she’s brought down a TON of ire on the blogs about this soundbite. Lots of people calling for her to step down and/or keep taking the meds…
Even though I’m an Obama supporter, I think she simply misspoke. They both look dog-tired at this point. She could have been a bit more gracious about her ‘apology’ – especially as she seems to have missed the point about her inference re: Obama/assassination by concentrating instead on just saying sorry to the Kennedys.
Still, the Obama camp seem to be leaving it alone, so if they’re not worried, neither am I. I certainly don’t think she needs some of the things described (in detail) that I’ve read on the likes of Huffpost…Bad luck too, on it running all over the Memorial Day weekend.
She’ll drag this on until the bitter end – that being around midnight of June 3rd. I think she’s thoroughly scuppered her chances, if she ever had any, of getting the VP slot, and I hope for her sake that she doesn’t suffer from another ‘foot-in-mouth’ moment before the inevitable conclusion of this bunfight.
I’d never vote for her if she was the nominee, and I’d have to think long and hard about withholding my vote, should she be chosen as Obama’s VP, but I think its best just to wait this out – she will eventually have to step down, and there’s nothing anyone (besides herself) that can do to dissuade or coerce her into doing it sooner.
I lived in London during Bill Clinton’s presidency, so only have a filtered – but largely favourable – memory of his time in office. But this whole campaign has lowered my estimation of them greatly. I know that alls fair in love and politics, but I don’t think I’ve ever seen two people so power-hungry (and obvious about it) in my life.
Roll on november, and lets hope this fiasco doesn’t drag on until the DNC.
May 24, 2008 at 10:09 AM #211084speedingpulletParticipantI know she’s brought down a TON of ire on the blogs about this soundbite. Lots of people calling for her to step down and/or keep taking the meds…
Even though I’m an Obama supporter, I think she simply misspoke. They both look dog-tired at this point. She could have been a bit more gracious about her ‘apology’ – especially as she seems to have missed the point about her inference re: Obama/assassination by concentrating instead on just saying sorry to the Kennedys.
Still, the Obama camp seem to be leaving it alone, so if they’re not worried, neither am I. I certainly don’t think she needs some of the things described (in detail) that I’ve read on the likes of Huffpost…Bad luck too, on it running all over the Memorial Day weekend.
She’ll drag this on until the bitter end – that being around midnight of June 3rd. I think she’s thoroughly scuppered her chances, if she ever had any, of getting the VP slot, and I hope for her sake that she doesn’t suffer from another ‘foot-in-mouth’ moment before the inevitable conclusion of this bunfight.
I’d never vote for her if she was the nominee, and I’d have to think long and hard about withholding my vote, should she be chosen as Obama’s VP, but I think its best just to wait this out – she will eventually have to step down, and there’s nothing anyone (besides herself) that can do to dissuade or coerce her into doing it sooner.
I lived in London during Bill Clinton’s presidency, so only have a filtered – but largely favourable – memory of his time in office. But this whole campaign has lowered my estimation of them greatly. I know that alls fair in love and politics, but I don’t think I’ve ever seen two people so power-hungry (and obvious about it) in my life.
Roll on november, and lets hope this fiasco doesn’t drag on until the DNC.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.