- This topic has 55 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 7 months ago by Huckleberry.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 13, 2008 at 1:23 PM #12723May 13, 2008 at 1:49 PM #203401EugeneParticipant
If anyone’s interested, here’s full text of the bill
http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/financialsvcs_dem/h_r__3221.pdf
parts relevant to the bailout start at page 9
a few more notes:
– Owner occupied only.
– You must have current debt to income ratio above 35% to qualify.
– New payments “shall be in an amount that is substantially reduced from the debt service payments due under the existing mortgage or mortgages”. This could be a problem for many people. If you’re getting rewritten from a 5% IO ARM for 600k into 5.8+1.5% fixed 30-year for 450k, your payments go UP even though your balance is reduced by 25%. Those FHA premiums bite.
– Can’t take out second mortgages or loans on the property for 5 years, unless explicitly permitted by “the Oversight Board” to maintain the property.
May 13, 2008 at 1:49 PM #203535EugeneParticipantIf anyone’s interested, here’s full text of the bill
http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/financialsvcs_dem/h_r__3221.pdf
parts relevant to the bailout start at page 9
a few more notes:
– Owner occupied only.
– You must have current debt to income ratio above 35% to qualify.
– New payments “shall be in an amount that is substantially reduced from the debt service payments due under the existing mortgage or mortgages”. This could be a problem for many people. If you’re getting rewritten from a 5% IO ARM for 600k into 5.8+1.5% fixed 30-year for 450k, your payments go UP even though your balance is reduced by 25%. Those FHA premiums bite.
– Can’t take out second mortgages or loans on the property for 5 years, unless explicitly permitted by “the Oversight Board” to maintain the property.
May 13, 2008 at 1:49 PM #203500EugeneParticipantIf anyone’s interested, here’s full text of the bill
http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/financialsvcs_dem/h_r__3221.pdf
parts relevant to the bailout start at page 9
a few more notes:
– Owner occupied only.
– You must have current debt to income ratio above 35% to qualify.
– New payments “shall be in an amount that is substantially reduced from the debt service payments due under the existing mortgage or mortgages”. This could be a problem for many people. If you’re getting rewritten from a 5% IO ARM for 600k into 5.8+1.5% fixed 30-year for 450k, your payments go UP even though your balance is reduced by 25%. Those FHA premiums bite.
– Can’t take out second mortgages or loans on the property for 5 years, unless explicitly permitted by “the Oversight Board” to maintain the property.
May 13, 2008 at 1:49 PM #203478EugeneParticipantIf anyone’s interested, here’s full text of the bill
http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/financialsvcs_dem/h_r__3221.pdf
parts relevant to the bailout start at page 9
a few more notes:
– Owner occupied only.
– You must have current debt to income ratio above 35% to qualify.
– New payments “shall be in an amount that is substantially reduced from the debt service payments due under the existing mortgage or mortgages”. This could be a problem for many people. If you’re getting rewritten from a 5% IO ARM for 600k into 5.8+1.5% fixed 30-year for 450k, your payments go UP even though your balance is reduced by 25%. Those FHA premiums bite.
– Can’t take out second mortgages or loans on the property for 5 years, unless explicitly permitted by “the Oversight Board” to maintain the property.
May 13, 2008 at 1:49 PM #203451EugeneParticipantIf anyone’s interested, here’s full text of the bill
http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/financialsvcs_dem/h_r__3221.pdf
parts relevant to the bailout start at page 9
a few more notes:
– Owner occupied only.
– You must have current debt to income ratio above 35% to qualify.
– New payments “shall be in an amount that is substantially reduced from the debt service payments due under the existing mortgage or mortgages”. This could be a problem for many people. If you’re getting rewritten from a 5% IO ARM for 600k into 5.8+1.5% fixed 30-year for 450k, your payments go UP even though your balance is reduced by 25%. Those FHA premiums bite.
– Can’t take out second mortgages or loans on the property for 5 years, unless explicitly permitted by “the Oversight Board” to maintain the property.
May 13, 2008 at 2:17 PM #203545Ex-SDParticipantAny way you look at this ridiculous bill, it’s a bunch of horse crap. Why in the world should the taxpayer’s of the USA bail out people who bought a home and it didn’t turn out the way they expected? There is no precedent for passing this bill. Other than bleeding-heart idiots like Barney Frank (who couldn’t hit himself in the butt with both hands) and his socialist cohorts who are pushing this legislation, what kind of responsible politician would vote for this foolishness? I don’t personally know one person who is for this bill. At least Bush (whom I have little regard for) has come out against it and says that he will veto the bill. Whether he will follow through with his threat is another matter. I don’t think the bleeding-heart, giveaway artists in Congress can muster enough votes to override a Bush veto…….but who knows? It IS an election year and that can make politicians act dumber than they normally act.
If this passes, many of the people that get rescued will still default because their houses will continue to go down in value for several more years and probably not recover any appreciation for another 12-20 years. And thanks to Barney & Friends, the taxpayer will foot the bill because the Federal Govt is going to guarantee the loans. This is our government at it’s worst and the poster child for irresponsibility.
May 13, 2008 at 2:17 PM #203460Ex-SDParticipantAny way you look at this ridiculous bill, it’s a bunch of horse crap. Why in the world should the taxpayer’s of the USA bail out people who bought a home and it didn’t turn out the way they expected? There is no precedent for passing this bill. Other than bleeding-heart idiots like Barney Frank (who couldn’t hit himself in the butt with both hands) and his socialist cohorts who are pushing this legislation, what kind of responsible politician would vote for this foolishness? I don’t personally know one person who is for this bill. At least Bush (whom I have little regard for) has come out against it and says that he will veto the bill. Whether he will follow through with his threat is another matter. I don’t think the bleeding-heart, giveaway artists in Congress can muster enough votes to override a Bush veto…….but who knows? It IS an election year and that can make politicians act dumber than they normally act.
If this passes, many of the people that get rescued will still default because their houses will continue to go down in value for several more years and probably not recover any appreciation for another 12-20 years. And thanks to Barney & Friends, the taxpayer will foot the bill because the Federal Govt is going to guarantee the loans. This is our government at it’s worst and the poster child for irresponsibility.
May 13, 2008 at 2:17 PM #203409Ex-SDParticipantAny way you look at this ridiculous bill, it’s a bunch of horse crap. Why in the world should the taxpayer’s of the USA bail out people who bought a home and it didn’t turn out the way they expected? There is no precedent for passing this bill. Other than bleeding-heart idiots like Barney Frank (who couldn’t hit himself in the butt with both hands) and his socialist cohorts who are pushing this legislation, what kind of responsible politician would vote for this foolishness? I don’t personally know one person who is for this bill. At least Bush (whom I have little regard for) has come out against it and says that he will veto the bill. Whether he will follow through with his threat is another matter. I don’t think the bleeding-heart, giveaway artists in Congress can muster enough votes to override a Bush veto…….but who knows? It IS an election year and that can make politicians act dumber than they normally act.
If this passes, many of the people that get rescued will still default because their houses will continue to go down in value for several more years and probably not recover any appreciation for another 12-20 years. And thanks to Barney & Friends, the taxpayer will foot the bill because the Federal Govt is going to guarantee the loans. This is our government at it’s worst and the poster child for irresponsibility.
May 13, 2008 at 2:17 PM #203510Ex-SDParticipantAny way you look at this ridiculous bill, it’s a bunch of horse crap. Why in the world should the taxpayer’s of the USA bail out people who bought a home and it didn’t turn out the way they expected? There is no precedent for passing this bill. Other than bleeding-heart idiots like Barney Frank (who couldn’t hit himself in the butt with both hands) and his socialist cohorts who are pushing this legislation, what kind of responsible politician would vote for this foolishness? I don’t personally know one person who is for this bill. At least Bush (whom I have little regard for) has come out against it and says that he will veto the bill. Whether he will follow through with his threat is another matter. I don’t think the bleeding-heart, giveaway artists in Congress can muster enough votes to override a Bush veto…….but who knows? It IS an election year and that can make politicians act dumber than they normally act.
If this passes, many of the people that get rescued will still default because their houses will continue to go down in value for several more years and probably not recover any appreciation for another 12-20 years. And thanks to Barney & Friends, the taxpayer will foot the bill because the Federal Govt is going to guarantee the loans. This is our government at it’s worst and the poster child for irresponsibility.
May 13, 2008 at 2:17 PM #203488Ex-SDParticipantAny way you look at this ridiculous bill, it’s a bunch of horse crap. Why in the world should the taxpayer’s of the USA bail out people who bought a home and it didn’t turn out the way they expected? There is no precedent for passing this bill. Other than bleeding-heart idiots like Barney Frank (who couldn’t hit himself in the butt with both hands) and his socialist cohorts who are pushing this legislation, what kind of responsible politician would vote for this foolishness? I don’t personally know one person who is for this bill. At least Bush (whom I have little regard for) has come out against it and says that he will veto the bill. Whether he will follow through with his threat is another matter. I don’t think the bleeding-heart, giveaway artists in Congress can muster enough votes to override a Bush veto…….but who knows? It IS an election year and that can make politicians act dumber than they normally act.
If this passes, many of the people that get rescued will still default because their houses will continue to go down in value for several more years and probably not recover any appreciation for another 12-20 years. And thanks to Barney & Friends, the taxpayer will foot the bill because the Federal Govt is going to guarantee the loans. This is our government at it’s worst and the poster child for irresponsibility.
May 13, 2008 at 4:14 PM #203436drunkleParticipant“You must have current debt to income ratio above 35% to qualify.”
does that mean what i think it means? who is this bailout aimed at?
ex-sd: every idiot in washington is a bleeding heart socialist. it just depends on which social circle they belong to.
May 13, 2008 at 4:14 PM #203513drunkleParticipant“You must have current debt to income ratio above 35% to qualify.”
does that mean what i think it means? who is this bailout aimed at?
ex-sd: every idiot in washington is a bleeding heart socialist. it just depends on which social circle they belong to.
May 13, 2008 at 4:14 PM #203537drunkleParticipant“You must have current debt to income ratio above 35% to qualify.”
does that mean what i think it means? who is this bailout aimed at?
ex-sd: every idiot in washington is a bleeding heart socialist. it just depends on which social circle they belong to.
May 13, 2008 at 4:14 PM #203487drunkleParticipant“You must have current debt to income ratio above 35% to qualify.”
does that mean what i think it means? who is this bailout aimed at?
ex-sd: every idiot in washington is a bleeding heart socialist. it just depends on which social circle they belong to.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.