A question for SD Realtor – Piggington's Econo-Almanac

This topic has 10 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 7 months ago by sd_matt.

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)

Author

Posts
May 8, 2008 at 2:38 PM #12684

sd_matt
Participant

2 entries from a foreclosure report. WHATS GOIN ON HERE? We have an old loan for over $650k and a recent sale for $123k. This is in Kensington. Then scroll down and look past the line of pound signs and look at the owners on a second entry on this property. Sorry for all the clutter.

79 Subject Info: Trustee/Contact: Default Information: Notice of Trustee Sale(NOS): REO:
County: SAN DIEGO CAL WESTERN RECONVEYANCE Rec Date: 01/02/2008 Rec Date: 04/07/2008 Sale Date: 04/28/2008
Site: 4117 LYMER DR 525 E MAIN ST Doc #: 2008-0001556 Doc #: 2008-0181424 Doc #: 2008-0223203
EL CAJON CA 92022 $30,108 Auction Date: 04/23/2008 Sale Price: $123,559
SAN DIEGO CA 92116 Delq $:
Parcel: 440-382-14 C/O Attn: Time: 10:00A Buyer: ROBERT HARRINGTON
Unpaid $:
As Of: 01/02/2008 Min Bid: $739,854 4117 LYMER DR
Page-Grid: 1269-2H
TS #: 1128538-14 Auction 250 E MAIN ST SAN DIEGO CA 92116
Owner: Phone: 619-590-9200
Loan Information: Location: EL CAJON
JEAN ELIZABETH LEACH Beneficiary:
Loan $: $692,000
4117 LYMER DR MTGLQ
Loan Date: 06/30/2006
SAN DIEGO 92116
Loan Doc #: 2006-0466317
Property & Sale Info Sq Ft: 3,076 YB: 1928 Stories: Baths: 2
Use: Single Family Residential Lot Sz: 8,425 Beds: 3 Units: 1 Garg: Yes
Legal: Lot: 14 Block: 8 Subdivision: KENSINGTON MANOR UNIT #1
Last Sold: 04/28/2008 Sale Amount: $123,559
Loan Amount: Doc #: 2008-0223203
############################################################

NOD/NOS/REO Details
81 Subject Info: Trustee/Contact: Default Information: Notice of Trustee Sale(NOS): REO:
County: SAN DIEGO WESTMINSTER FINANCIAL Rec Date: 12/12/2007 Rec Date: 03/18/2008 Sale Date: 04/28/2008
Site: 4117 LYMER DR 3560 4TH AVE Doc #: 2007-0767308 Doc #: 2008-0141117 Doc #: 2008-0223203
SAN DIEGO CA 92103 $4,266 Auction Date: 04/10/2008 Sale Price: $123,559
SAN DIEGO CA 92116 Delq $:
Parcel: 440-382-14 C/O Attn: Time: 10:00A Buyer: ROBERT HARRINGTON
Unpaid $:
As Of: 12/07/2007 Min Bid: $121,676 4117 LYMER DR
Page-Grid: 1269-2H CAROL COTE
TS #: Auction 220 W BROADWAY SAN DIEGO CA 92116
Owner: Phone: 619-294-6689
Loan Information: Location: SAN DIEGO
DALE A AND JEAN E LEACH Beneficiary:
Loan $: $113,627
4117 LYMER DR WESTMINSTER FINANCIAL
Loan Date: 04/30/2007
SAN DIEGO 92116
Loan Doc #: 2007-0294209
Property & Sale Info Sq Ft: 3,076 YB: 1928 Stories: Baths: 2
Use: Single Family Residential Lot Sz: 8,425 Beds: 3 Units: 1 Garg: Yes
Legal: Lot: 14 Block: 8 Subdivision: KENSINGTON MANOR UNIT #1
Last Sold: 04/28/2008 Sale Amount: $123,559
Loan Amount: Doc #: 2008-0223203

May 9, 2008 at 1:25 AM #201643

SD Realtor
Participant

Hi Matt –

It is late and I am pretty tired. Been so swamped I haven’t had much time to browse the forum lately. Okay I would have more confidence in explaining this if I called my title officer and had him hunt around on it… As far as I can tell, AND this is a TOTAL GUESS… so it seems like he paid off the second like you said, at the trustee sale for 123k. Now I am wondering if somehow he has assumed the first or something like that. You know what I am saying? The first did not just go away. What happened to it? I don’t know… Yeah this is funky but I believe there is an explanation. I cannot promise I will get to research it more but remind me a few times and I will try.

May 9, 2008 at 1:25 AM #201689

SD Realtor
Participant

Hi Matt –

It is late and I am pretty tired. Been so swamped I haven’t had much time to browse the forum lately. Okay I would have more confidence in explaining this if I called my title officer and had him hunt around on it… As far as I can tell, AND this is a TOTAL GUESS… so it seems like he paid off the second like you said, at the trustee sale for 123k. Now I am wondering if somehow he has assumed the first or something like that. You know what I am saying? The first did not just go away. What happened to it? I don’t know… Yeah this is funky but I believe there is an explanation. I cannot promise I will get to research it more but remind me a few times and I will try.

May 9, 2008 at 1:25 AM #201716

SD Realtor
Participant

Hi Matt –

It is late and I am pretty tired. Been so swamped I haven’t had much time to browse the forum lately. Okay I would have more confidence in explaining this if I called my title officer and had him hunt around on it… As far as I can tell, AND this is a TOTAL GUESS… so it seems like he paid off the second like you said, at the trustee sale for 123k. Now I am wondering if somehow he has assumed the first or something like that. You know what I am saying? The first did not just go away. What happened to it? I don’t know… Yeah this is funky but I believe there is an explanation. I cannot promise I will get to research it more but remind me a few times and I will try.

May 9, 2008 at 1:25 AM #201740

SD Realtor
Participant

Hi Matt –

It is late and I am pretty tired. Been so swamped I haven’t had much time to browse the forum lately. Okay I would have more confidence in explaining this if I called my title officer and had him hunt around on it… As far as I can tell, AND this is a TOTAL GUESS… so it seems like he paid off the second like you said, at the trustee sale for 123k. Now I am wondering if somehow he has assumed the first or something like that. You know what I am saying? The first did not just go away. What happened to it? I don’t know… Yeah this is funky but I believe there is an explanation. I cannot promise I will get to research it more but remind me a few times and I will try.

May 9, 2008 at 1:25 AM #201777

SD Realtor
Participant

Hi Matt –

It is late and I am pretty tired. Been so swamped I haven’t had much time to browse the forum lately. Okay I would have more confidence in explaining this if I called my title officer and had him hunt around on it… As far as I can tell, AND this is a TOTAL GUESS… so it seems like he paid off the second like you said, at the trustee sale for 123k. Now I am wondering if somehow he has assumed the first or something like that. You know what I am saying? The first did not just go away. What happened to it? I don’t know… Yeah this is funky but I believe there is an explanation. I cannot promise I will get to research it more but remind me a few times and I will try.

May 9, 2008 at 8:46 AM #201738

sd_matt
Participant

Actually your guess is more than I had, which wasn’t a clue.

But I see what you are saying. Maybe he, or someone else, assumed the first.

I’ll call the title officer like I’m interested in the property and see what comes out of it.

May 9, 2008 at 8:46 AM #201784

sd_matt
Participant

Actually your guess is more than I had, which wasn’t a clue.

But I see what you are saying. Maybe he, or someone else, assumed the first.

I’ll call the title officer like I’m interested in the property and see what comes out of it.

May 9, 2008 at 8:46 AM #201810

sd_matt
Participant

Actually your guess is more than I had, which wasn’t a clue.

But I see what you are saying. Maybe he, or someone else, assumed the first.

I’ll call the title officer like I’m interested in the property and see what comes out of it.

May 9, 2008 at 8:46 AM #201836

sd_matt
Participant

Actually your guess is more than I had, which wasn’t a clue.

But I see what you are saying. Maybe he, or someone else, assumed the first.

I’ll call the title officer like I’m interested in the property and see what comes out of it.

May 9, 2008 at 8:46 AM #201872

sd_matt
Participant

Actually your guess is more than I had, which wasn’t a clue.

But I see what you are saying. Maybe he, or someone else, assumed the first.

I’ll call the title officer like I’m interested in the property and see what comes out of it.
Author

Posts

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.