- This topic has 15 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 27, 2008 at 5:29 PM #12578April 27, 2008 at 6:27 PM #195306BugsParticipant
The almost unspoken premise of the article is that the damage is contained and that the underlying fundamentals will be okay once we get past these foreclosures.
Foreclosures are hitting the bottom end harder at this point. Measuring them would tend to show a much lower median price because they’re concentrated on the bottom end of the market. There aren’t as many foreclosures in the upper price ranges so when surveying the average of all “market” transactions so you would naturally include the much higher percentage of the bigger/better properties.
It’s no wonder there’s a gap between the two – they’re comparing the smaller/less desireable homes to the larger/more desireable homes. It’s genius, I tell you, genius. Add in a little “Alan” speak from Mssrs Gin and Nevin and we get the 2008 version of the “Soft Landing” fantasy.
There is no “two-market” scenario on the bottom end because the foreclosures are driving that entire market. Morons.
April 27, 2008 at 6:27 PM #195337BugsParticipantThe almost unspoken premise of the article is that the damage is contained and that the underlying fundamentals will be okay once we get past these foreclosures.
Foreclosures are hitting the bottom end harder at this point. Measuring them would tend to show a much lower median price because they’re concentrated on the bottom end of the market. There aren’t as many foreclosures in the upper price ranges so when surveying the average of all “market” transactions so you would naturally include the much higher percentage of the bigger/better properties.
It’s no wonder there’s a gap between the two – they’re comparing the smaller/less desireable homes to the larger/more desireable homes. It’s genius, I tell you, genius. Add in a little “Alan” speak from Mssrs Gin and Nevin and we get the 2008 version of the “Soft Landing” fantasy.
There is no “two-market” scenario on the bottom end because the foreclosures are driving that entire market. Morons.
April 27, 2008 at 6:27 PM #195365BugsParticipantThe almost unspoken premise of the article is that the damage is contained and that the underlying fundamentals will be okay once we get past these foreclosures.
Foreclosures are hitting the bottom end harder at this point. Measuring them would tend to show a much lower median price because they’re concentrated on the bottom end of the market. There aren’t as many foreclosures in the upper price ranges so when surveying the average of all “market” transactions so you would naturally include the much higher percentage of the bigger/better properties.
It’s no wonder there’s a gap between the two – they’re comparing the smaller/less desireable homes to the larger/more desireable homes. It’s genius, I tell you, genius. Add in a little “Alan” speak from Mssrs Gin and Nevin and we get the 2008 version of the “Soft Landing” fantasy.
There is no “two-market” scenario on the bottom end because the foreclosures are driving that entire market. Morons.
April 27, 2008 at 6:27 PM #195383BugsParticipantThe almost unspoken premise of the article is that the damage is contained and that the underlying fundamentals will be okay once we get past these foreclosures.
Foreclosures are hitting the bottom end harder at this point. Measuring them would tend to show a much lower median price because they’re concentrated on the bottom end of the market. There aren’t as many foreclosures in the upper price ranges so when surveying the average of all “market” transactions so you would naturally include the much higher percentage of the bigger/better properties.
It’s no wonder there’s a gap between the two – they’re comparing the smaller/less desireable homes to the larger/more desireable homes. It’s genius, I tell you, genius. Add in a little “Alan” speak from Mssrs Gin and Nevin and we get the 2008 version of the “Soft Landing” fantasy.
There is no “two-market” scenario on the bottom end because the foreclosures are driving that entire market. Morons.
April 27, 2008 at 6:27 PM #195425BugsParticipantThe almost unspoken premise of the article is that the damage is contained and that the underlying fundamentals will be okay once we get past these foreclosures.
Foreclosures are hitting the bottom end harder at this point. Measuring them would tend to show a much lower median price because they’re concentrated on the bottom end of the market. There aren’t as many foreclosures in the upper price ranges so when surveying the average of all “market” transactions so you would naturally include the much higher percentage of the bigger/better properties.
It’s no wonder there’s a gap between the two – they’re comparing the smaller/less desireable homes to the larger/more desireable homes. It’s genius, I tell you, genius. Add in a little “Alan” speak from Mssrs Gin and Nevin and we get the 2008 version of the “Soft Landing” fantasy.
There is no “two-market” scenario on the bottom end because the foreclosures are driving that entire market. Morons.
April 27, 2008 at 6:51 PM #195317DWCAPParticipantMore evidence that anything said in the right way can be construed to be positive. It isnt affordability, it’s the foreclosures. As soon as we work out these foreclosures, itll be back to 2004 all over again.
Wait, why did so many go into foreclosure?
April 27, 2008 at 6:51 PM #195348DWCAPParticipantMore evidence that anything said in the right way can be construed to be positive. It isnt affordability, it’s the foreclosures. As soon as we work out these foreclosures, itll be back to 2004 all over again.
Wait, why did so many go into foreclosure?
April 27, 2008 at 6:51 PM #195375DWCAPParticipantMore evidence that anything said in the right way can be construed to be positive. It isnt affordability, it’s the foreclosures. As soon as we work out these foreclosures, itll be back to 2004 all over again.
Wait, why did so many go into foreclosure?
April 27, 2008 at 6:51 PM #195395DWCAPParticipantMore evidence that anything said in the right way can be construed to be positive. It isnt affordability, it’s the foreclosures. As soon as we work out these foreclosures, itll be back to 2004 all over again.
Wait, why did so many go into foreclosure?
April 27, 2008 at 6:51 PM #195435DWCAPParticipantMore evidence that anything said in the right way can be construed to be positive. It isnt affordability, it’s the foreclosures. As soon as we work out these foreclosures, itll be back to 2004 all over again.
Wait, why did so many go into foreclosure?
April 27, 2008 at 8:00 PM #195338sdrealtorParticipantThat’s funny. I thought it was a good article with an accurate assessment of the market. I was able to block out the cheerleaders and got the real message. In some markets foreclosures are dominating the market and they are driving prices down quickly. In markets without foreclosures, prices are holding up better so far.
I thought it was a good clear message to the layperson. When the number of foreclosures skyrockets on your street get ready for prices to plummet.
April 27, 2008 at 8:00 PM #195368sdrealtorParticipantThat’s funny. I thought it was a good article with an accurate assessment of the market. I was able to block out the cheerleaders and got the real message. In some markets foreclosures are dominating the market and they are driving prices down quickly. In markets without foreclosures, prices are holding up better so far.
I thought it was a good clear message to the layperson. When the number of foreclosures skyrockets on your street get ready for prices to plummet.
April 27, 2008 at 8:00 PM #195394sdrealtorParticipantThat’s funny. I thought it was a good article with an accurate assessment of the market. I was able to block out the cheerleaders and got the real message. In some markets foreclosures are dominating the market and they are driving prices down quickly. In markets without foreclosures, prices are holding up better so far.
I thought it was a good clear message to the layperson. When the number of foreclosures skyrockets on your street get ready for prices to plummet.
April 27, 2008 at 8:00 PM #195414sdrealtorParticipantThat’s funny. I thought it was a good article with an accurate assessment of the market. I was able to block out the cheerleaders and got the real message. In some markets foreclosures are dominating the market and they are driving prices down quickly. In markets without foreclosures, prices are holding up better so far.
I thought it was a good clear message to the layperson. When the number of foreclosures skyrockets on your street get ready for prices to plummet.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.