- This topic has 20 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 7 months ago by .
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
sorry ex-sd, just saw you posted it already…
sorry ex-sd, just saw you posted it already…
sorry ex-sd, just saw you posted it already…
sorry ex-sd, just saw you posted it already…
sorry ex-sd, just saw you posted it already…
yes…..just read this link off the Drudge Report π
Spring bounce allright… (In Noida, India – perhaps)
yes…..just read this link off the Drudge Report π
Spring bounce allright… (In Noida, India – perhaps)
yes…..just read this link off the Drudge Report π
Spring bounce allright… (In Noida, India – perhaps)
yes…..just read this link off the Drudge Report π
Spring bounce allright… (In Noida, India – perhaps)
yes…..just read this link off the Drudge Report π
Spring bounce allright… (In Noida, India – perhaps)
Divide California’s 13,174,378 housing units (*) by 188,684 yearly foreclosures (47,171 foreclosures times 4) and we find that 1 in 69 housing units will likely be foreclosed upon this year in California.
Not something to be proud of, for sure.
(*) = According to the census people:
Divide California’s 13,174,378 housing units (*) by 188,684 yearly foreclosures (47,171 foreclosures times 4) and we find that 1 in 69 housing units will likely be foreclosed upon this year in California.
Not something to be proud of, for sure.
(*) = According to the census people:
Divide California’s 13,174,378 housing units (*) by 188,684 yearly foreclosures (47,171 foreclosures times 4) and we find that 1 in 69 housing units will likely be foreclosed upon this year in California.
Not something to be proud of, for sure.
(*) = According to the census people:
Divide California’s 13,174,378 housing units (*) by 188,684 yearly foreclosures (47,171 foreclosures times 4) and we find that 1 in 69 housing units will likely be foreclosed upon this year in California.
Not something to be proud of, for sure.
(*) = According to the census people: