- This topic has 90 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 11 months ago by
SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 8, 2008 at 2:20 PM #11434January 8, 2008 at 3:01 PM #131881
stansd
ParticipantHoly Crap…that explains the low November.
A quick look at history seems to show that December often blips, though.
Jan often tends to be higher still, however.
Stan
January 8, 2008 at 3:01 PM #132168ParticipantHoly Crap…that explains the low November.
A quick look at history seems to show that December often blips, though.
Jan often tends to be higher still, however.
Stan
January 8, 2008 at 3:01 PM #132134ParticipantHoly Crap…that explains the low November.
A quick look at history seems to show that December often blips, though.
Jan often tends to be higher still, however.
Stan
January 8, 2008 at 3:01 PM #132063ParticipantHoly Crap…that explains the low November.
A quick look at history seems to show that December often blips, though.
Jan often tends to be higher still, however.
Stan
January 8, 2008 at 3:01 PM #132072ParticipantHoly Crap…that explains the low November.
A quick look at history seems to show that December often blips, though.
Jan often tends to be higher still, however.
Stan
January 8, 2008 at 3:04 PM #132180davelj
ParticipantAnyone know why the November numbers broke the trend so decisively only to have the trend reasserted with a vengeance in December? Someone mentioned in a previous post that maybe the November numbers represented a seasonal issue, or perhaps loan modifications were increasing, which I couldn’t disagree with. But the December numbers are a nightmare. If December is any indication of what 2008 numbers are going to look like… we could see 15,000+ trustee deeds next year, which is 250% of the worst year during the 90s (1996 to be exact). Oh Lawzy… lawzy lawzy lawzy.
January 8, 2008 at 3:04 PM #132143ParticipantAnyone know why the November numbers broke the trend so decisively only to have the trend reasserted with a vengeance in December? Someone mentioned in a previous post that maybe the November numbers represented a seasonal issue, or perhaps loan modifications were increasing, which I couldn’t disagree with. But the December numbers are a nightmare. If December is any indication of what 2008 numbers are going to look like… we could see 15,000+ trustee deeds next year, which is 250% of the worst year during the 90s (1996 to be exact). Oh Lawzy… lawzy lawzy lawzy.
January 8, 2008 at 3:04 PM #132085ParticipantAnyone know why the November numbers broke the trend so decisively only to have the trend reasserted with a vengeance in December? Someone mentioned in a previous post that maybe the November numbers represented a seasonal issue, or perhaps loan modifications were increasing, which I couldn’t disagree with. But the December numbers are a nightmare. If December is any indication of what 2008 numbers are going to look like… we could see 15,000+ trustee deeds next year, which is 250% of the worst year during the 90s (1996 to be exact). Oh Lawzy… lawzy lawzy lawzy.
January 8, 2008 at 3:04 PM #131891ParticipantAnyone know why the November numbers broke the trend so decisively only to have the trend reasserted with a vengeance in December? Someone mentioned in a previous post that maybe the November numbers represented a seasonal issue, or perhaps loan modifications were increasing, which I couldn’t disagree with. But the December numbers are a nightmare. If December is any indication of what 2008 numbers are going to look like… we could see 15,000+ trustee deeds next year, which is 250% of the worst year during the 90s (1996 to be exact). Oh Lawzy… lawzy lawzy lawzy.
January 8, 2008 at 3:04 PM #132073ParticipantAnyone know why the November numbers broke the trend so decisively only to have the trend reasserted with a vengeance in December? Someone mentioned in a previous post that maybe the November numbers represented a seasonal issue, or perhaps loan modifications were increasing, which I couldn’t disagree with. But the December numbers are a nightmare. If December is any indication of what 2008 numbers are going to look like… we could see 15,000+ trustee deeds next year, which is 250% of the worst year during the 90s (1996 to be exact). Oh Lawzy… lawzy lawzy lawzy.
January 8, 2008 at 3:26 PM #132108unbiasedobserver
ParticipantDuring the 90’s bust the monthly defaults peaked around 1100 per month, this Dec. over 2,700! I’m estimating 40,000 defaults in 2008 alone. This is getting far worse than even I believed it would.
January 8, 2008 at 3:26 PM #132119ParticipantDuring the 90’s bust the monthly defaults peaked around 1100 per month, this Dec. over 2,700! I’m estimating 40,000 defaults in 2008 alone. This is getting far worse than even I believed it would.
January 8, 2008 at 3:26 PM #132213ParticipantDuring the 90’s bust the monthly defaults peaked around 1100 per month, this Dec. over 2,700! I’m estimating 40,000 defaults in 2008 alone. This is getting far worse than even I believed it would.
January 8, 2008 at 3:26 PM #132178ParticipantDuring the 90’s bust the monthly defaults peaked around 1100 per month, this Dec. over 2,700! I’m estimating 40,000 defaults in 2008 alone. This is getting far worse than even I believed it would.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.