- This topic has 95 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 9 months ago by
lonestar2000.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 12, 2007 at 10:33 AM #11181December 12, 2007 at 10:40 AM #115070
Fearful
ParticipantHi Dave,
Okay, “shitty asset crisis” it is.
You know a good place to get a chart of the TED spread? Or, maybe more to the point, a chart comparing any interbank rate with its corresponding central bank rate?
Thanks in advance,
Eric
December 12, 2007 at 10:40 AM #115237Fearful
ParticipantHi Dave,
Okay, “shitty asset crisis” it is.
You know a good place to get a chart of the TED spread? Or, maybe more to the point, a chart comparing any interbank rate with its corresponding central bank rate?
Thanks in advance,
Eric
December 12, 2007 at 10:40 AM #115231Fearful
ParticipantHi Dave,
Okay, “shitty asset crisis” it is.
You know a good place to get a chart of the TED spread? Or, maybe more to the point, a chart comparing any interbank rate with its corresponding central bank rate?
Thanks in advance,
Eric
December 12, 2007 at 10:40 AM #115199Fearful
ParticipantHi Dave,
Okay, “shitty asset crisis” it is.
You know a good place to get a chart of the TED spread? Or, maybe more to the point, a chart comparing any interbank rate with its corresponding central bank rate?
Thanks in advance,
Eric
December 12, 2007 at 10:40 AM #115273Fearful
ParticipantHi Dave,
Okay, “shitty asset crisis” it is.
You know a good place to get a chart of the TED spread? Or, maybe more to the point, a chart comparing any interbank rate with its corresponding central bank rate?
Thanks in advance,
Eric
December 12, 2007 at 11:13 AM #115288NeetaT
Participantdavelj,
What you have stated sounds logical and I believe it. As long as someone is holding a fortified asset, why not loan money to them? I think most banks would. The problem cannot be linked to anything else but bad or depreciating assets. I think the rule should be that banks loan at the maximum, 70% of the true appraisal and only at a fixed rate. I don’t borrow money, so I don’t know much about it. I’m just letting common sense guide me.
December 12, 2007 at 11:13 AM #115213NeetaT
Participantdavelj,
What you have stated sounds logical and I believe it. As long as someone is holding a fortified asset, why not loan money to them? I think most banks would. The problem cannot be linked to anything else but bad or depreciating assets. I think the rule should be that banks loan at the maximum, 70% of the true appraisal and only at a fixed rate. I don’t borrow money, so I don’t know much about it. I’m just letting common sense guide me.
December 12, 2007 at 11:13 AM #115085NeetaT
Participantdavelj,
What you have stated sounds logical and I believe it. As long as someone is holding a fortified asset, why not loan money to them? I think most banks would. The problem cannot be linked to anything else but bad or depreciating assets. I think the rule should be that banks loan at the maximum, 70% of the true appraisal and only at a fixed rate. I don’t borrow money, so I don’t know much about it. I’m just letting common sense guide me.
December 12, 2007 at 11:13 AM #115246NeetaT
Participantdavelj,
What you have stated sounds logical and I believe it. As long as someone is holding a fortified asset, why not loan money to them? I think most banks would. The problem cannot be linked to anything else but bad or depreciating assets. I think the rule should be that banks loan at the maximum, 70% of the true appraisal and only at a fixed rate. I don’t borrow money, so I don’t know much about it. I’m just letting common sense guide me.
December 12, 2007 at 11:13 AM #115252NeetaT
Participantdavelj,
What you have stated sounds logical and I believe it. As long as someone is holding a fortified asset, why not loan money to them? I think most banks would. The problem cannot be linked to anything else but bad or depreciating assets. I think the rule should be that banks loan at the maximum, 70% of the true appraisal and only at a fixed rate. I don’t borrow money, so I don’t know much about it. I’m just letting common sense guide me.
December 12, 2007 at 11:20 AM #115293SD Realtor
ParticipantCould not agree more Dave.
SD Realtor
December 12, 2007 at 11:20 AM #115090SD Realtor
ParticipantCould not agree more Dave.
SD Realtor
December 12, 2007 at 11:20 AM #115218SD Realtor
ParticipantCould not agree more Dave.
SD Realtor
December 12, 2007 at 11:20 AM #115257SD Realtor
ParticipantCould not agree more Dave.
SD Realtor
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.