- This topic has 100 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 11 months ago by paramount.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 4, 2007 at 4:28 PM #11077December 4, 2007 at 6:26 PM #108873NotCrankyParticipant
I read an article in my wife’s “Healthy Living” magazine recently that claimed stents are bad news. There was no proof that they worked better than drugs alone and some evidence that they are dangerous. That may have something to do with it.
December 4, 2007 at 6:26 PM #108977NotCrankyParticipantI read an article in my wife’s “Healthy Living” magazine recently that claimed stents are bad news. There was no proof that they worked better than drugs alone and some evidence that they are dangerous. That may have something to do with it.
December 4, 2007 at 6:26 PM #109011NotCrankyParticipantI read an article in my wife’s “Healthy Living” magazine recently that claimed stents are bad news. There was no proof that they worked better than drugs alone and some evidence that they are dangerous. That may have something to do with it.
December 4, 2007 at 6:26 PM #109022NotCrankyParticipantI read an article in my wife’s “Healthy Living” magazine recently that claimed stents are bad news. There was no proof that they worked better than drugs alone and some evidence that they are dangerous. That may have something to do with it.
December 4, 2007 at 6:26 PM #109030NotCrankyParticipantI read an article in my wife’s “Healthy Living” magazine recently that claimed stents are bad news. There was no proof that they worked better than drugs alone and some evidence that they are dangerous. That may have something to do with it.
December 4, 2007 at 6:47 PM #108888DaCounselorParticipantStents, particularly the new-fangled drug coated variety, have gotten some bad press over the past few years. I’ve been tuned in because my uncle has one and my girl is in the med device industry. Stent sales are way off and I believe Abbott was looking to score big in the drug-coated stent category. Their new stent just got approved by an FDA panel (but not the by FDA, not yet).
December 4, 2007 at 6:47 PM #108993DaCounselorParticipantStents, particularly the new-fangled drug coated variety, have gotten some bad press over the past few years. I’ve been tuned in because my uncle has one and my girl is in the med device industry. Stent sales are way off and I believe Abbott was looking to score big in the drug-coated stent category. Their new stent just got approved by an FDA panel (but not the by FDA, not yet).
December 4, 2007 at 6:47 PM #109026DaCounselorParticipantStents, particularly the new-fangled drug coated variety, have gotten some bad press over the past few years. I’ve been tuned in because my uncle has one and my girl is in the med device industry. Stent sales are way off and I believe Abbott was looking to score big in the drug-coated stent category. Their new stent just got approved by an FDA panel (but not the by FDA, not yet).
December 4, 2007 at 6:47 PM #109037DaCounselorParticipantStents, particularly the new-fangled drug coated variety, have gotten some bad press over the past few years. I’ve been tuned in because my uncle has one and my girl is in the med device industry. Stent sales are way off and I believe Abbott was looking to score big in the drug-coated stent category. Their new stent just got approved by an FDA panel (but not the by FDA, not yet).
December 4, 2007 at 6:47 PM #109045DaCounselorParticipantStents, particularly the new-fangled drug coated variety, have gotten some bad press over the past few years. I’ve been tuned in because my uncle has one and my girl is in the med device industry. Stent sales are way off and I believe Abbott was looking to score big in the drug-coated stent category. Their new stent just got approved by an FDA panel (but not the by FDA, not yet).
December 4, 2007 at 6:48 PM #108893hipmattParticipantouch.. to add insult to injury. I have to say that I am a bit surprised that this type of business would lay off.
December 4, 2007 at 6:48 PM #108998hipmattParticipantouch.. to add insult to injury. I have to say that I am a bit surprised that this type of business would lay off.
December 4, 2007 at 6:48 PM #109031hipmattParticipantouch.. to add insult to injury. I have to say that I am a bit surprised that this type of business would lay off.
December 4, 2007 at 6:48 PM #109042hipmattParticipantouch.. to add insult to injury. I have to say that I am a bit surprised that this type of business would lay off.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.