La Jolla Foreclosure – down 600k in 1 year?

This topic has 40 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 17 years ago by XBoxBoy.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 41 total)

1 2 3 →

Author

Posts
November 14, 2007 at 5:53 PM #10905

trex
Participant

MLS #076088587

http://listings1.sandicor.com/SearchDetail/Scripts/PrtBuyFul/PrtBuyFul.asp?prp=mls&AgentId=638285&EmailKey=56636147

I don’t have the history but my realtor says it sold for 1.7 a year ago. Can anyone confirm?

November 14, 2007 at 6:09 PM #99504

Eugene
Participant

Zillow is your friend

Sale History
08/17/2006: $1,700,000
06/24/2005: $1,350,000
03/28/1989: $680,500

Judging by default amounts, purchased for zero down with a negative-amortization loan.

Looks like a good deal, wish I had this kind of money.

November 14, 2007 at 6:09 PM #99616

Eugene
Participant

Zillow is your friend

Sale History
08/17/2006: $1,700,000
06/24/2005: $1,350,000
03/28/1989: $680,500

Judging by default amounts, purchased for zero down with a negative-amortization loan.

Looks like a good deal, wish I had this kind of money.

November 14, 2007 at 6:09 PM #99607

Eugene
Participant

Zillow is your friend

Sale History
08/17/2006: $1,700,000
06/24/2005: $1,350,000
03/28/1989: $680,500

Judging by default amounts, purchased for zero down with a negative-amortization loan.

Looks like a good deal, wish I had this kind of money.

November 14, 2007 at 6:09 PM #99598

Eugene
Participant

Zillow is your friend

Sale History
08/17/2006: $1,700,000
06/24/2005: $1,350,000
03/28/1989: $680,500

Judging by default amounts, purchased for zero down with a negative-amortization loan.

Looks like a good deal, wish I had this kind of money.

November 14, 2007 at 6:09 PM #99580

Eugene
Participant

Zillow is your friend

Sale History
08/17/2006: $1,700,000
06/24/2005: $1,350,000
03/28/1989: $680,500

Judging by default amounts, purchased for zero down with a negative-amortization loan.

Looks like a good deal, wish I had this kind of money.

November 14, 2007 at 6:27 PM #99590

I would rather be lucky then smart
Participant

topography: steep slope
street address: Nautilus

The house is a good value if it stays on top of the slope and the street does not give away…

November 14, 2007 at 6:27 PM #99514

I would rather be lucky then smart
Participant

topography: steep slope
street address: Nautilus

The house is a good value if it stays on top of the slope and the street does not give away…

November 14, 2007 at 6:27 PM #99608

I would rather be lucky then smart
Participant

topography: steep slope
street address: Nautilus

The house is a good value if it stays on top of the slope and the street does not give away…

November 14, 2007 at 6:27 PM #99617

I would rather be lucky then smart
Participant

topography: steep slope
street address: Nautilus

The house is a good value if it stays on top of the slope and the street does not give away…

November 14, 2007 at 6:27 PM #99625

I would rather be lucky then smart
Participant

topography: steep slope
street address: Nautilus

The house is a good value if it stays on top of the slope and the street does not give away…

November 14, 2007 at 7:07 PM #99640

patientlywaiting
Participant

Some more info. The 2006 sale looks a little questionable to me. Are the seller and buyer related parties?

http://lajolla.whoboughtwhat.com/m/602031-1925–nautilus-street

It appears to be a bank-owned property.

http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-C41A0F03-1925_Nautilus_St_La_Jolla_CA_92037#8769

November 14, 2007 at 7:07 PM #99531

patientlywaiting
Participant

Some more info. The 2006 sale looks a little questionable to me. Are the seller and buyer related parties?

http://lajolla.whoboughtwhat.com/m/602031-1925–nautilus-street

It appears to be a bank-owned property.

http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-C41A0F03-1925_Nautilus_St_La_Jolla_CA_92037#8769

November 14, 2007 at 7:07 PM #99606

patientlywaiting
Participant

Some more info. The 2006 sale looks a little questionable to me. Are the seller and buyer related parties?

http://lajolla.whoboughtwhat.com/m/602031-1925–nautilus-street

It appears to be a bank-owned property.

http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-C41A0F03-1925_Nautilus_St_La_Jolla_CA_92037#8769

November 14, 2007 at 7:07 PM #99632

patientlywaiting
Participant

Some more info. The 2006 sale looks a little questionable to me. Are the seller and buyer related parties?

http://lajolla.whoboughtwhat.com/m/602031-1925–nautilus-street

It appears to be a bank-owned property.

http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-C41A0F03-1925_Nautilus_St_La_Jolla_CA_92037#8769
Author

Posts

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 41 total)

1 2 3 →

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.