- This topic has 25 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 10 months ago by cr.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 14, 2007 at 10:20 AM #10901November 14, 2007 at 3:22 PM #99452crParticipant
Rather than post a new thread…
Looks like that “pent up demand” will continue to build up due to what in hindsight will probably be an overcorrection.
“Residential mortgages were more difficult to get over the past three months than at any time in the 17-year history of the Federal Reserve’s survey of banks. Standards for other types of loans tightened too, while demand fell.”
http://realestate.msn.com/Buying/Article_mw.aspx?cp-documentid=5697915>1=10632
How will the NAR spin this one?
November 14, 2007 at 3:22 PM #99521crParticipantRather than post a new thread…
Looks like that “pent up demand” will continue to build up due to what in hindsight will probably be an overcorrection.
“Residential mortgages were more difficult to get over the past three months than at any time in the 17-year history of the Federal Reserve’s survey of banks. Standards for other types of loans tightened too, while demand fell.”
http://realestate.msn.com/Buying/Article_mw.aspx?cp-documentid=5697915>1=10632
How will the NAR spin this one?
November 14, 2007 at 3:22 PM #99538crParticipantRather than post a new thread…
Looks like that “pent up demand” will continue to build up due to what in hindsight will probably be an overcorrection.
“Residential mortgages were more difficult to get over the past three months than at any time in the 17-year history of the Federal Reserve’s survey of banks. Standards for other types of loans tightened too, while demand fell.”
http://realestate.msn.com/Buying/Article_mw.aspx?cp-documentid=5697915>1=10632
How will the NAR spin this one?
November 14, 2007 at 3:22 PM #99540crParticipantRather than post a new thread…
Looks like that “pent up demand” will continue to build up due to what in hindsight will probably be an overcorrection.
“Residential mortgages were more difficult to get over the past three months than at any time in the 17-year history of the Federal Reserve’s survey of banks. Standards for other types of loans tightened too, while demand fell.”
http://realestate.msn.com/Buying/Article_mw.aspx?cp-documentid=5697915>1=10632
How will the NAR spin this one?
November 14, 2007 at 3:22 PM #99547crParticipantRather than post a new thread…
Looks like that “pent up demand” will continue to build up due to what in hindsight will probably be an overcorrection.
“Residential mortgages were more difficult to get over the past three months than at any time in the 17-year history of the Federal Reserve’s survey of banks. Standards for other types of loans tightened too, while demand fell.”
http://realestate.msn.com/Buying/Article_mw.aspx?cp-documentid=5697915>1=10632
How will the NAR spin this one?
November 14, 2007 at 5:33 PM #99493SD RealtorParticipantOne thing I am curious about is if Yun uses data only gathered by the realtor associations or does he use data from public recordings. As auctions become more prevalent they will absolutely start to pull the median (which is still good for nothing IMO) down.
SD Realtor
November 14, 2007 at 5:33 PM #99570SD RealtorParticipantOne thing I am curious about is if Yun uses data only gathered by the realtor associations or does he use data from public recordings. As auctions become more prevalent they will absolutely start to pull the median (which is still good for nothing IMO) down.
SD Realtor
November 14, 2007 at 5:33 PM #99604SD RealtorParticipantOne thing I am curious about is if Yun uses data only gathered by the realtor associations or does he use data from public recordings. As auctions become more prevalent they will absolutely start to pull the median (which is still good for nothing IMO) down.
SD Realtor
November 14, 2007 at 5:33 PM #99588SD RealtorParticipantOne thing I am curious about is if Yun uses data only gathered by the realtor associations or does he use data from public recordings. As auctions become more prevalent they will absolutely start to pull the median (which is still good for nothing IMO) down.
SD Realtor
November 14, 2007 at 5:33 PM #99597SD RealtorParticipantOne thing I am curious about is if Yun uses data only gathered by the realtor associations or does he use data from public recordings. As auctions become more prevalent they will absolutely start to pull the median (which is still good for nothing IMO) down.
SD Realtor
November 14, 2007 at 5:47 PM #99602crParticipantGood question. Wherever he gets it, he certainly only looks at the things that can be spun into naive optimism.
There’s so much wrong with every statement he makes it’s not ever worth refuting.
Does anyone have any idea on the value of ARMs that have reset so far since this bubble started?
I wonder how the roughly $1 trillion in ARMS still to reset compares to the amount that already reset and caused the damage we’ve seen so far. Either way, I’d bet default/foreclosure rates increase.
November 14, 2007 at 5:47 PM #99611crParticipantGood question. Wherever he gets it, he certainly only looks at the things that can be spun into naive optimism.
There’s so much wrong with every statement he makes it’s not ever worth refuting.
Does anyone have any idea on the value of ARMs that have reset so far since this bubble started?
I wonder how the roughly $1 trillion in ARMS still to reset compares to the amount that already reset and caused the damage we’ve seen so far. Either way, I’d bet default/foreclosure rates increase.
November 14, 2007 at 5:47 PM #99593crParticipantGood question. Wherever he gets it, he certainly only looks at the things that can be spun into naive optimism.
There’s so much wrong with every statement he makes it’s not ever worth refuting.
Does anyone have any idea on the value of ARMs that have reset so far since this bubble started?
I wonder how the roughly $1 trillion in ARMS still to reset compares to the amount that already reset and caused the damage we’ve seen so far. Either way, I’d bet default/foreclosure rates increase.
November 14, 2007 at 5:47 PM #99574crParticipantGood question. Wherever he gets it, he certainly only looks at the things that can be spun into naive optimism.
There’s so much wrong with every statement he makes it’s not ever worth refuting.
Does anyone have any idea on the value of ARMs that have reset so far since this bubble started?
I wonder how the roughly $1 trillion in ARMS still to reset compares to the amount that already reset and caused the damage we’ve seen so far. Either way, I’d bet default/foreclosure rates increase.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.