[zk]

[quote=sreeb]
I view staying, forcing foreclosure, and stalling the process while not paying as a clear ethical problem.
[/quote]

What about staying and just waiting until the bank takes your house? Not stalling the bank, but just waiting for the overwhelmed bank to finally get around to taking their house back.

I have a friend in Murietta who is about 300k upside down on his house. He is considering a strategic default and asked my opinion. I told him I thought he should stop making payments and wait for the bank to take his house back. His wife thinks that is wrong. I think it’s a business decision.

I’m curious what your distinction is between giving the bank the house back right away and waiting for them to take it.

Thanks in advance for your opinion.

[zk]

[quote=sreeb]
I view staying, forcing foreclosure, and stalling the process while not paying as a clear ethical problem.
[/quote]

What about staying and just waiting until the bank takes your house? Not stalling the bank, but just waiting for the overwhelmed bank to finally get around to taking their house back.

I have a friend in Murietta who is about 300k upside down on his house. He is considering a strategic default and asked my opinion. I told him I thought he should stop making payments and wait for the bank to take his house back. His wife thinks that is wrong. I think it’s a business decision.

I’m curious what your distinction is between giving the bank the house back right away and waiting for them to take it.

Thanks in advance for your opinion.

[zk]

[quote=desmond]btw, I was labeled “the instigator”[/quote]

Good one.

[zk]

[quote=desmond]btw, I was labeled “the instigator”[/quote]

Good one.

[zk]

[quote=desmond]btw, I was labeled “the instigator”[/quote]

Good one.

[zk]

[quote=desmond]btw, I was labeled “the instigator”[/quote]

Good one.

[zk]

[quote=desmond]btw, I was labeled “the instigator”[/quote]

Good one.

[zk]

Well, first of all, “happy that he was ‘the thinker'” is totally incorrect. What I said was that I was amazed that it was so accurate and detailed a description. There are a dozen other types that I think I’d be somewhat happier to be.

This test was discussed briefly on another topic, and three or four people revealed their profiles. I still think it would be interesting to hear from more of the posters here what profile they are.

[zk]

Well, first of all, “happy that he was ‘the thinker'” is totally incorrect. What I said was that I was amazed that it was so accurate and detailed a description. There are a dozen other types that I think I’d be somewhat happier to be.

This test was discussed briefly on another topic, and three or four people revealed their profiles. I still think it would be interesting to hear from more of the posters here what profile they are.

[zk]

Well, first of all, “happy that he was ‘the thinker'” is totally incorrect. What I said was that I was amazed that it was so accurate and detailed a description. There are a dozen other types that I think I’d be somewhat happier to be.

This test was discussed briefly on another topic, and three or four people revealed their profiles. I still think it would be interesting to hear from more of the posters here what profile they are.

[zk]

Well, first of all, “happy that he was ‘the thinker'” is totally incorrect. What I said was that I was amazed that it was so accurate and detailed a description. There are a dozen other types that I think I’d be somewhat happier to be.

This test was discussed briefly on another topic, and three or four people revealed their profiles. I still think it would be interesting to hear from more of the posters here what profile they are.

[zk]

Well, first of all, “happy that he was ‘the thinker'” is totally incorrect. What I said was that I was amazed that it was so accurate and detailed a description. There are a dozen other types that I think I’d be somewhat happier to be.

This test was discussed briefly on another topic, and three or four people revealed their profiles. I still think it would be interesting to hear from more of the posters here what profile they are.

[zk]

I think calling him a troll is giving him way too much credit. I think he really believes all the ridiculousness he spouts.

The real problem with ignorance is that the ignorant are rarely aware of their ignorance.

[zk]

I think calling him a troll is giving him way too much credit. I think he really believes all the ridiculousness he spouts.

The real problem with ignorance is that the ignorant are rarely aware of their ignorance.

[zk]

I think calling him a troll is giving him way too much credit. I think he really believes all the ridiculousness he spouts.

The real problem with ignorance is that the ignorant are rarely aware of their ignorance.

[Author]

Posts